On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 07:15 +0200, Paul de Weerd wrote:
> | So, you are suggesting using something other than the hash stored in
> | OpenBSD's master.passwd then?
>
> Why exactly would we need another hash ?
Because the hashes in master.passwd are salted, as you come to realise
yourself further
Hi all,
I'd like some clarification on the support or non-support of the lladdr
option in ipconfig. I'm getting conflicting evidence from various
sources: on-line man page (+), man page of my brand new 3.7 install (-),
various forums (mix of + and -). It looks as if the ipconfig that comes
with 3.7
On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 10:11 +1000, Steffen Kluge wrote:
> I'd like some clarification on the support or non-support of the lladdr
> option in ipconfig.
For crying out loud. Don't know where that came from, probably from
setting up a LAN party for my son last we
On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 02:17 +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
> the manpages are (surprise, eh) right. no lladdr in 3.7, but it is in
> -current.
Thanks.
Can I simply pick the ifconfig binary out of snapshots/i386/base37.tgz,
or must I upgrade the whole thing, including packages and ports? If I
upgra
Hi all,
I recently moved a web server in my domain to OpenBSD 3.7. Out of
curiosity I looked it up at netcraft. While they correctly identified
the web server software, the OS was listed as "unkown".
Not that I really care about this, but I'm curious as to what prevented
them from fingerprinting t
Johan M:son Lindman wrote:
http://www.catb.org/~esr/guns/
Thanks for pointing that out, Johan.
Of course, ESR being a gun nut makes his opinion about software
licensing irrelevant at best, and wrong at worst. I mean, who would want
the terms of a license as oppressive as the GPL written on t
On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 22:20 -0500, Jeff Bachtel wrote:
> You know, I've often been accused of being unable to read, but to my
> eyes it appears Raymond was positing that the GPL was not needed, and
> that software should be released under a BSD license.
Actually, he said "GPL is based on the belie
Hi all,
I was wondering whether sudo 1.6.8p8 as found in -current has the
pathname validation vulnerability reported recently (e.g. at
http://www.auscert.org.au/render.html?it=5193).
Its version number would suggest it does, however OBSD might contain
patches that are not included upstream, or oth
On Tue, 2005-06-21 at 17:00 -0700, Timothy Horie wrote:
> I installed amavisd and I'm using Postfix but since I am using the
> proxy_filter for amavisd, I can't use the REDIRECT keyword in
> /etc/postfix/relay_recipients.
In relay_recipient_maps the RHS is ignored anyway. The files listed
under
On Tue, 2005-06-28 at 00:52 +0200, Rogier Krieger wrote:
> I've given up hope on the ethernet chip ever
> getting supported as well as the S-ATA controller on board. In both
> cases, I blame nVidia.
/*
* forcedeth: Ethernet driver for NVIDIA nForce media access controllers.
*
* Note: This drive
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 22:19 +0200, Matthias Kilian wrote:
> find /home/kili -maxdepth 1 -type f -name \* -mtime +1 -exec echo {} \; |
> grep ssh
This test is irrelevant to the OP's problem.
> yields no output at all. [And of course, I *do* have a .ssh directory.]
But do you have *files* (-type f
On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 18:43 +0100, Johan SANCHEZ wrote:
> And time to time this one:
> natbox dhclient[19726]: buf_read (connection closed): Undefined error: 0
That's what I'm seeing every time I run "sh /etc/netstart sis0". After
this a new dhclient gets started and the DHCP lease will be
obtaine
I just noticed that a fresh 3.8 install doesn't contain the DST
exception that has been declared for Australia (NSW and ACT) this year,
apparently to accommodate the Commonwealth Games.
This year, daylight savings won't be turned back on the last Sunday in
March, as usual, but a week later on the
On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 19:23 +1100, Rod.. Whitworth wrote:
> >Proper handling of DST can be checked by running "zdump -v -c 2007
> >Australia/NSW".
>
> or Sydney or Melbourne, Canberra, Hobart, Victoria, Tasmania, Adelaide,
> South or whatever you use that is affected
Sydney, NSW, Canberra and ACT
On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 10:16 +0100, Toni Mueller wrote:
> Try
> to name at least one incentive for Alberta to fund a project where the
> financial benefits will largely be reaped outside of Alberta.
For a lot of people, OpenBSD has put Alberta on the map...
Cheers
Steffen.
On Sat, 2006-05-13 at 16:18 +0200, Ed White wrote:
> It seems XFree people disagree...
> [...]
> ...and some Linux developers too...
>
> Alan Cox: What it essentially says is "if you can hack the machine enough to
> get the ability to issue raw i/o accesses you can get any other power you
> want"
16 matches
Mail list logo
