On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 12:27:38AM +0200, Stefan Wollny wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> having a personal dislike of Facebook (and the MeeToo-systems alike)
> for their impertinent sniffing for private data I tried on my laptop to
> block facebook.com via hosts-file.
> My question is on the squid-serve
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 05:42:04AM -0400, Eric Furman wrote:
> Holy Jesus, nobody read this guys email.
> He is not an administrator trying to block users
> access to facebook, he just doesn't want facebook snooping
> him when he visits other websites.
> He has been given the right answer already.
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 01:04:01AM +0200, Stefan Wollny wrote:
[stuff deleted for brevity]
>> I am in a similar situation (squid at home) and I simply have a
>> blacklist with lines like these:
>>
>> doubleclick
>> facebook
>> scorecardresearch
>>
>> Works like a charm for me, and no need to lo
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 12:29:22AM +0930, David Walker wrote:
[citation needed]
>>> http://bit.ly/3dMFBs
>>Best message on this thread in days.
>
> Agreed.
> Several gems in a row.
>
>>And probably the last one worth reading. Including this one. All are invited
>>to join me in a nice hot c
Dear misc@,
Am I correct when I assume that timed, using the Berkeley Unix TSP
protocol, is not capable of dealing with subnets? It's a 25 year
old protocol so I have to fear the answer is yes.
The reason I ask is that I recently bought a (2nd hand) managed
switch and foolishly enough decided to
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 05:53:09PM +0300, What you get is Not what you see
wrote:
> Hi
> I have installed OpenBSD 4.5 on a machine and try to use NFS exports
> on it. But the performance is very bad.
> I have another machine with 4.1 on it whose NFS performance is
> awesome. I did the same config
On one of my PCs I ran into the process table full / cannot fork
trouble, so I decided to make a single change in the GENERIC
kernel config: I bumped up the maxusers setting to 128.
Config warned me that "config: warning: maxusers (128) > 100".
I grepped around in /usr/src/usr.sbin/config and fou
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 12:06:14PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 11:57:32AM +0100, Sico Bruins wrote:
>
>> On one of my PCs I ran into the process table full / cannot fork
>> trouble, so I decided to make a single change in the GENERIC
>> kernel
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 12:42:42PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 12:36:49PM +0100, Sico Bruins wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 12:06:14PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 11:57:32AM +0100, Sico Bruins wrote:
>&
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 12:42:42PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
[mostly deleted for brevity]
> You are confusing groups and login classes.
Foot in mouth time, putting in "staff" with vipw has magically lifted
the 100 process limit. Now back to a lower maxusers setting (below 100),
maybe something
10 matches
Mail list logo
