Crypto Partition Problem

2006-06-04 Thread Rott_En
Hello I had a power failure yesterday morning and because of that my server went down because of no battery present. When trying to mount the crypto partitions, I have figured out its not possible anymore because a set of 2 errors, as follows: # sh cryptfs -m -p /home -f /crypto/home/cryptof

Re: Crypto Partition Problem

2006-06-04 Thread Rott_En
m not sure what to do to mount properly as accesing the cryptofile is ok, it hasnt been damaged. Tobias Weisserth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, On Jun 4, 2006, at 11:07 AM, Rott_En wrote: >Hello > > I had a power failure yesterday morning and because of that my > serv

Re: Does Lenovo suck ?

2006-06-04 Thread Rott_En
I have a Lenovo R51e and I can tell you that the hardware is 100% compatible with almost all live CD *nix distributions, no problem at all. I am very satisfied of this product because it is robust and fair, battery life is good and hardware seems to be largely supported. Cheers! Uwe Dippel <[E

Re: Crypto Partition Problem

2006-06-05 Thread Rott_En
if I risk using your method of repair. Thank you in advance. Juha Erkkila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 02:07:22AM -0700, Rott_En wrote: > # Important Note: Under OpenBSD's current encrypted vnd filesystem > # implementation, when a system with a m

Re: Crypto Partition Problem

2006-06-05 Thread Rott_En
at 04:47:28AM -0700, Rott_En wrote: > Is it a risk to attempt using your recommedation ? Am I risking the > integrity of my cryptofile container ? It is 90GB big and I dont have > any auxiliary backup medium so big, taking a backup of it is almost > out of hope. > > I can't loose t

Re: Does Lenovo suck ?

2006-06-05 Thread Rott_En
u for your time. MikeM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 6/4/2006 at 8:43 PM Rott_En wrote: |I have a Lenovo R51e and I can tell you that the hardware is 100% |compatible with almost all live CD *nix distributions, no problem at all. | |I am very satisfied of this product because it is robu

Re: Crypto Partition Problem

2006-06-06 Thread Rott_En
# Cyl 0 -1830146* # If I change "unused" to 4.2BSD fsck reports serval errors like SuperBlocks are missing. Any advice is highly welcomed, as before. Thank you. Juha Erkkila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 01:01:34PM -0700, Rott_En wrote: > I used