Rationale for allowing mount_mfs in securelevel 2?

2005-10-18 Thread Roman Rodyakin
am perhaps misunderstanding the concept of securelevel and protections allowed by it. I searched both mailing list archives and Google, but couldn't find anything relevant. Feel free to point me to earlier discussions on the subject, if there were any. Thanks, Roman Rodyakin.

Re: Rationale for allowing mount_mfs in securelevel 2?

2005-10-19 Thread Roman Rodyakin
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 08:44:49AM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > > On Wed, 19 Oct 2005, Roman Rodyakin wrote: > > > I have been recently thinking about trade-offs involved in running > > servers at the securelevel 2. In securelevel 2, it is possible to mount > > a