softdeps enabled = poor "concurrent" access?

2010-02-23 Thread Noah McNallie
ally. I'm guessing somewhere near 25x. It's very slow on this machine without sofdeps. Any help leading to a sollution is more than apreciated! Noah McNallie n0ah

Re: softdeps enabled = poor "concurrent" access?

2010-02-23 Thread Noah McNallie
On 02/23/2010 08:47 PM, Bryan wrote: where's your dmesg? have you tried a -current snapshot? On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 18:20, Noah McNallie wrote: Hey guys. Noah here. I'd like to use openbsd on an older machine i have. I've had it on there before and never tested something

Re: softdeps enabled = poor "concurrent" access?

2010-02-23 Thread Noah McNallie
On 02/23/2010 08:47 PM, Bryan wrote: where's your dmesg? have you tried a -current snapshot? On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 18:20, Noah McNallie wrote: Hey guys. Noah here. I'd like to use openbsd on an older machine i have. I've had it on there before and never tested something

Re: softdeps enabled = poor "concurrent" access?

2010-02-24 Thread Noah McNallie
On 02/24/2010 05:10 AM, Tobias Ulmer wrote: On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 10:52:05AM +0100, Jan Stary wrote: On Feb 23 19:20:28, Noah McNallie wrote: Hey guys. Noah here. I'd like to use openbsd on an older machine i have. I've had it on there before and never tested something that i'

Re: softdeps enabled = poor "concurrent" access?

2010-02-24 Thread Noah McNallie
On 02/24/2010 04:52 AM, Jan Stary wrote: On Feb 23 19:20:28, Noah McNallie wrote: Hey guys. Noah here. I'd like to use openbsd on an older machine i have. I've had it on there before and never tested something that i've been testing on various operating systems lately. That

Re: softdeps enabled = poor "concurrent" access?

2010-02-24 Thread Noah McNallie
On 02/24/2010 07:41 AM, Artur Grabowski wrote: On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 1:20 AM, Noah McNallie wrote: Well, i've found on openbsd without sofdeps enabled it will do this just fine. But when enabling softdeps it will not. The 'uname' or 'ls' will take quite a while

Re: Intel Atom D510MO performance issue

2010-02-25 Thread Noah McNallie
takes cpu cycles, schedule it correctly, using disk takes io, schedule it correctly, and not so much on subject but using the network takes bandwidth, so schedule that correctly to. once done, your system/network can be at max production yet still be completely responsive for what you choose it to be completely responsive for (as if nothing was going on). Noah McNallie n0ah