On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 07:20:10PM -0500, Marco Peereboom wrote:
>
> Softraid is not a volume manager. We don't support adding, removing chunks
> after creation time. I'll take diffs for this however this is pretty far from
> trivial.
The one piece of information I found a bit unclear in the manua
n't be improved but that bit is IMO pretty
> obvious.
Obvious it probably is, yet adding the word 'final' for the device
argument in the manpage description would perhaps make it even more
obvious.
:-)
>
> On Oct 23, 2010, at 23:07, Niels Poppe wrote:
>
> >
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 10:09:55AM -0500, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 03:00:23PM +0200, Niels Poppe wrote:
> >
> > .. would have expected
> > "bioctl -R sd1 softraid0" for the case below.
>
> What slice is being rebuilt onto?
Well...
> >> On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 03:00:23PM +0200, Niels Poppe wrote:
> >>>
> >>> .. would have expected
> >>> "bioctl -R sd1 softraid0" for the case below.
> >>
> >> What slice is being rebuilt onto?
> >
> > We
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 06:05:35PM -0500, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> On Oct 24, 2010, at 17:54, Niels Poppe wrote:
>
> > I have (err, had) this working array:
> >
> > # bioctl softraid0
> > Volume Status Size Device
> > softraid0 0 Online
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 09:09:52PM -0500, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> odd. does dmesg spit anything useful out?
actually, no.
for the usb stick pulling out the machine:
sd0 detached
scsibus0 detached
umass0 detached
after that, because i accessed the softraid filesystem:
softraid0: retrying read
Just to be complete and honest, i think i should reveil as well
that it is all built and installed from source, and kernel and
userland have slightly different build dates:
# ls -ld /bsd
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 8916825 Oct 13 04:18 /bsd
and userland is built just a bit later:
# ls -ld /sbin/b
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 09:18:19AM -0700, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> Niels Poppe [ni...@netbox.org] wrote:
> >
> > # bioctl -R sd0a sd2
> > bioctl: Target sd0a: target not specified
> >
>
> I ran into this just the other day,
>
> bioctl -R sd0a sd2 didn&#
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 05:39:27PM -0700, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> Are the partition sizes on sd0a/sd1a (I assume the are mirrored) the same?
> What does disklabel show for the RAIDed disks?
>
sd0 and sd2 are exactly identical
# disklabel sd0
# /dev/rsd0c:
type: SCSI
disk: SCSI disk
label: USB
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 03:02:43AM +0200, Niels Poppe wrote:
>
> sd0 and sd2 are exactly identical
correction: sd0 and sd1
10 matches
Mail list logo
