Hello,
I was wondering how one can recover from a softraid in raid1 with a
failed device. Recover being: just run on 1 leg until I can find a
replacement disk. The error on reboot I'm faced with after loosing one
disk is the following:
softraid0: not assembling partial disk that used to be volume
On Mon, 02 Mar 2009 15:39:43 -0600
Aaron Poffenberger wrote:
> You can't rebuild a softraid(4) right now (manually or
> automatically). You have to recreate it. The process is to make a new
> softraid and restore(8) the data from a recent dump(8).
>
> If you don't have a dump you can create the
On Tue, 3 Mar 2009 14:14:22 -0500
Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Nick Nauwelaerts
> wrote:
> > # bioctl -C force -c 1 -l /dev/sd1d softraid0
> > bioctl: not enough disks
> >
> > Any clues? I'm looking for a way to use it with just one dis
I'm also running my /var on softraid since yesterday. To move the data I
used a static copy of rsync & bsd.rd, took about 2 minutes.
As for #3, that's something that can be taken into account once you
know that it can happen.
// nick
On Tue, 3 Mar 2009 22:26:09 -0600
Marco Peereboom wrote:
>
On Fri, 6 Mar 2009 11:07:06 -0500
Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Alexander Hall
> wrote:
> > Would the ffs partition end at the end of the raid partition, i.e.
> > would it be ($raidsize-64) blocks?
>
> Technically yes, you should trim it down, though only matters so far
Hello,
I'm trying to get -current snapshot working on my laptop but thus far
I've had no luck. Whenever I try to boot bsd.rd my system hangs while
still loading the kernel. This hang seems to happen after it loads
pciide but before any wd drives are detected. I've tried disabling the
following in v
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:24:00 +0200
Nick Nauwelaerts wrote:
> I'm trying to get -current snapshot working on my laptop but thus far
> I've had no luck. Whenever I try to boot bsd.rd my system hangs while
> still loading the kernel. This hang seems to happen after it loads
>
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:44:02 -0600
Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please test this on all acpi capable machines and send me a dmesg if
> you see this in the dmesg: store from field!!
Is this in any recent snapshots or source only?
And I have the same question for the tech@ email wi
On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 19:01:21 +0100
"Xavier Millihs-Lacroix" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Who wins in the OpenBSD world? DRAC (Dell Remote Admin Card) or iLo
> (HP's Integrated Lights Out) (or better ilo2) ?
>
> We're looking at new servers and are wondering if these are worth the
> cash, or which
On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 11:36:58 -0500
Steve Shockley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joe Warren-Meeks wrote:
> > I thought you only needed the license if you used higher resolutions
> > than a basic console. If you are just using text mode on the
> > console, then they work excellently.
>
> ILO2 can't
On Sat, 3 Feb 2007 19:49:17 - (UTC)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> apm is not supported on my laptop and this means I cannot suspend
> etc. But I would like to know which things could be "switched off" or
> lowered, so that I can write a script and for instance I can go away
> from my laptop for h
On Sat, 3 Feb 2007 21:16:03 - (UTC)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am using OpenBSD 4.0 as it was released some four months ago.
>
> Nice to hear what you're saying but I don't really understand
> something. From your words I've got the feeling that you say: before
> my laptop could not work wi
On Sun, 4 Feb 2007 19:50:26 +0100
Pau Amaro-Seoane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just downloaded cd40.iso from
> ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots and installed openbsd on
> my laptop because I thought the kernel would be -current but when
> booting I tried bsd -c and then UKC> enable a
On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 22:06:43 +0100
Joachim Schipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Since prebind has already been explained in detail, I want to add that
does indeed work, but if you use it on your ports it will invalidate
all of the hashes used by pkg_add (which is most likely one of the
issues theo
On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 10:03:37 -0700
Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oh really, "it has been stated". By who? Overall, I doubt that all
> of our security technologies add more than about 2% of a performance
> hit. Even a 'make build' on most architectures did not add that. I
> think y
Heya,
It seems I'm experiencing some data corruption on nfs when -w or -r
aren't powers of 2.
I have a local file with these settings:
% md5 sunclock.diff
MD5 (sunclock.diff) = 9f002849da08cd6ab76032a8cf2726e1
now, if I export the filesystem (nfsd -tu -n 4) it's on I get data
corruption when I tr
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 21:20:49 +0200
Maurice Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday, September 20, 2007 at 19:02:23 +, Christian
> Weisgerber wrote:
> >I need to look at the options for fitting a compact flash as an ATA
> >drive into a normal PC.
>
> There are lot's of adapters. Some
On Wed, 5 Nov 2008 14:37:06 -0600
"Neal Hogan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been running -current via snapshots and have had odd glxgears
> output between the 10/28 snap and 11/02 snap. Back on the 10/02
> version I was getting 1000-1300 fps. On the 11/02 version I get
> 100-130 fps. It's not
Hello,
I'm having some issues connecting to 802.11g wireless networks with a
somewhat recent snapshot. I've got a linksys WAP54G access point v2,
running firmware release 2.08. With the access point completely open
(ssid broadcast, no mac filters), OpenBSD will only connect to it in
802.11b mode. W
On Wed, 19 Apr 2006 11:00:59 -0700 (PDT)
Joe Advisor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> CPU0 states: 0.6% user, 0.0% nice, 3.0% system,
> 0.0% interrupt, 96.4% idle
> CPU1 states: 0.2% user, 0.0% nice, 1.2% system,
> 0.0% interrupt, 98.6% idle
> CPU2 states: 0.2% user, 0.0% nice, 1.0% system
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 10:09:01 -0700
Bryan Irvine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My first question is this, is everyone at Promise incompetent?
>
> My second question is, does anyone know what card I can use with SATA
> 150 drives?
I've got a 4 port Silicon Image 3114 card coming, which should be
Hello,
I'm having some issues getting raidframe to work for me. I've got 6
harddisks in my machine, of which I use 4 for raid: wd2 -> wd5. On each
harddisk I've set up 1 partition with fdisk, and the created 2
diskslices with disklabel, both which have type "RAID". Then I've set up
device raid0, wh
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 20:39:50 +0200 (CEST)
Otto Moerbeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 18 Oct 2005, Nick Nauwelaerts wrote:
>
> > newfs: /dev/rraid2a: Device not configured
>
> [snip]
>
> > 16 partitions:
> > # size
On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 10:25:07 -0600
Sibastien Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I do have one question about the following lines though:
>
> dkcsum: wd0 matches BIOS drive 0x80
> wd1: no disk label
> dkcsum: wd1 matches BIOS drive 0x81
> dkcsum: wd1 matches BIOS drive 0x82 IGNORED
> wd2: no disk
On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 11:42:45 +0200 (CEST)
Beck Zoltan Gyula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to ask if it is possible to use a large, more than 2T
> diskarray or CCD?
> In FAQ: "14.7 - What are the issues regarding large
> drives with OpenBSD?
>
> OpenBSD supports an individual file
On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 16:22:53 +1300
Stephen Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for your prompt reply. I misunderstood you last time, I thought
> you were suggesting that one of the drives was defective.
> I tried swapping the CDROM, but the x336 are 1U rackmounted servers,
> and they use cu
On Mon, 09 Jan 2006 18:44:53 +1100
Damien Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > i am in need to write event driven processing applications. I must
> > avoid sequential processing. I will be mixing RPC queries and dns
> > ones.
> >
> > I saw, at the first sigh, writing non batch program is very ha
On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 15:30:10 -0700
David Wilk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know RAIDframe is not in GENERIC, but I was wondering if anyone
> could speak to the stability and reliability of RAIDframe in 3.8. I
> find myself really wanting to use software RAID 1 and haven't had any
> problems in
On Sat, 30 Apr 2005 17:40:50 +0200
"Paul Wittmayer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does OpenBSD support Intel Xeon 64Bit processors?
>
> Didn't find anything on the web.
>
> Thanks for help.
>
> Paul
Booted on an IBM x336 last time i tried, with AMD64 kernel ofcourse.
// nick
29 matches
Mail list logo
