Yeah, can I order one? This thread is hilariously funny! I even managed to get
an entire car full of people laughing by reading it to them from my mobile.
Long live OpenBSD and long live ZFS - I love you both!
On 22 Feb 2013, at 16:18, Brian Callahan wrote:
> On 2/22/2013 8:02 AM, Ted Unangs
ZFS or UFS snapshots, FreeBSD.
On 29 Apr 2013, at 19:54, Xianwen Chen wrote:
> Hi fellas,
>
> I'm looking for a versioning file system or a comparative implementation. The
> idea is that I want to store file changes for some periods of time. I also
> want to be able to delete earliest few p
Hi,
I'm running 5.5 release, all patches applied.
I have a few questions about npppd running in combination with isakmpd.
If npppd tunnel listen address can't be changed and
l2tp-ipsec-require isn't supported, then how is one supposed to secure
the npppd service from dictionary attacks fro
Quoting YASUOKA Masahiko :
You can change the listen address by npppd.conf:
tunnel L2TP protocol l2tp {
listen on xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
}
So npppd.conf(5) is not accurate (states that changing listener
address is not currently supported):
--
BUGS
The current version of npppd(8) do
Quoting Martijn Rijkeboer :
Hi,
I'm trying to migrate our Postfix setup to OpenSMTPD. The setup consists of
two MX servers that run Spamd and that forward the incoming mail to a
internal mail server that contains the mailboxes. In Postfix a transport
map is used to accomplish this. Is it possib
Quoting Martijn Rijkeboer :
Hi,
# incoming mail for our domains is relayed to "i-mail" server
accept from any for domain relay hostname i-mail
But this will also relay non existing mailboxes. Any suggestions for that?
Sure, put your list of addresses in spamd.alloweddomains (yes, it's
Quoting Gregory Edigarov :
my solution would be:
accept from any for domain d1.com virtual relay hostname i-mail
This is doing the same work for half the benefit, i.e. you build the
list anyway but don't integrate it with spamd.
-mike
Quoting ML mail :
I have four /24 subnets and currently have one subnet per ethernet
interface (1Gbit/s) on my openbsd firewall. Now I was wondering if
in terms of performance (especially latency/pps) it is better to
have one subnet per ethernet interface like I have now or to have
the fo
Quoting worik :
In a fresh(ish) OpenBSD installation I note .cshrc and .profile in /.
Why?
bin:*:3:7:Binaries Commands and Source:/:/sbin/nologin
Quoting Tristan PILAT :
Hi folks,
I'm running out of memory on a server causing packets drop and out of
memory errors. I'm trying to found out what's exactly using the memory.
There are few apps running on it, mainly bgpd, bind, and pf with lots of
rules.
Here is the top:
load averages: 1.33
Quoting bodie :
6) Wired LAN not supported
Any hints for points 6 and 7?
I read through your dmesg twice but didn't see anything related to
wired lan. OTOH, my eyes don't always work so well when they're dry
after having been lasered. What is the name of your wired LAN device?
And that
11 matches
Mail list logo
