On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 00:02:16 +0200, Christian Taube
wrote:
> What I am missing now is a way to run a script when the IP address on
> the pppoe interface changes. There seems to be no mechanism
> like the /etc/ppp/ppp.linkup script provided by the user-space pppoe(8)
> driver.
You might try the p
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 23:23:52 -0700, patrick keshishian
wrote:
> Don't leave zombies behind. Collect your children or ignore SIGCHLD.
Sigh, yeah... I meant to handle that, but then got side tracked and
forgot to fix it when I came back to send the email.
Oh well, updated zombie-proof version belo
I don't believe there's been a NaCl update since that was posted, so
you'll still need to apply the patch I posted in the thread.
Also, the prototype DNSCurve forwarder uses epoll(2) directly, so it
won't work on OpenBSD. The dnscache patches should work fine though.
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 9:30
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 9:21 AM, matteo filippetto
wrote:
>> Then mail me acpidump -o hp8350 results + dmesg + pcidump -v
>>
>
> Hi,
>
> I have an hp ProBook 4520s that has problem with acpi (boot only with
> acpi disable).
>
> Do you need my results for those commands?
Only if you want it fixed.
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 6:22 AM, Jordi Beltran Creix
wrote:
> ls(1) needs to use wcwidth(3) instead of just assuming 1 for alignment
> and if I remember correctly it also mangles the strings using
> isprint(3) or hardcoded values instead of iswprint(3) when printing to
> terminal which is probably
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> Does anyone know if the following patch is a good idea for OpenBSD or
> simply never needed no matter how many mails you process.
>
> http://vorlon.cwru.edu/~tmb2/qmail-1.03/qmail-1.03-maildir-uniq.patch
I would not use that patch. There a
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Mark Bucciarelli wrote:
> i downloaded a 4.8 snapshot this morning
> and am trying to install via pxeboot on
> an x30.
>
> boot> disable acpi
> boot> boot bsd.rd
>
> ran fine until
>
> Which one is the root disk? [wd0]
>
> I pressed enter, and sometime
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
> The closest I have to that is an X20, which I just did a full PXE
> booted install on, and it works fine.
I just did a pxeboot upgrade on my X40, and it went fine as well. I
also went as far as fsck'ing my disk with acpi disabled in UKC, to
d
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 5:18 PM, ropers wrote:
> Here you go:
> http://i.imgur.com/Bns7H.png
I lol'd.
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote:
>
Thanks for the detailed report. We'll get right on this.
2010/10/6 dMITRIJ cARXKOW :
> Some mail bug must have happened. I ment that install48.iso's bad.rd stops
> booting after configuring storage devices on my ACER AO531h netbook. I'm
> currently running 4.7 with no issues on the same hardware.
Some more details would be helpful. E.g., at least a dme
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
> So what does it mean for a single byte write to be atomic?
That some bits in a byte won't be updated without other bits being
updated as well.
2009/7/27 Jean-Frangois SIMON :
> Thanks for your reply, however there is something I do not understand about
> the below error. Are versions not compatible with each other ? the package
> rplay was calling for gsm-1.0.10p0, I copied the only version available in
> current which is gsm-1.0.13.tgz t
According to pf.conf:
If no-df is given, fragments with the dont-fragment bit set have
it cleared before entering the fragment cache, and thus the
reassembled packet doesn't have dont-fragment set either.
But from reading the code, and from experimentation, this seems
backwards: dont-
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Martin Schrvder wrote:
> If the fingerprint is unknown, an alternative method of
> verification is available: SSH fingerprints ver-
> ified by DNS. An additional resource record (RR), SSHFP, is
> added to a zonefile and the connecting
> client is able
Just since upgrade46.html mentions the new syntax for packet scrubbing
and specifically describes the behavior of the no-df flag, perhaps it
should mention that the 4.6-release (and 4.6-stable?) kernel uses the
opposite semantics for this setting? (See r1.120 of
sys/net/pf_norm.c.)
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 6:19 PM, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
wrote:
> I'v already seen the "alias" option for ifconfig, however, it always
> refers to static IPs, and I've found no reference to this being
> possible with dynamic IPs.
> Is this possible? A single interface, with TWO dynamic IPs?
This is
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Dmitry-T wrote:
> Have OpenBSD non-preemptible kernel code?
OpenBSD kernel code running in "process context" (i.e., kernel threads
and user processes running system calls) cannot preempt one another.
However, interrupts may preempt processes or other interrupts of
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Paolo Aglialoro wrote:
> "pckbcintr: no dev for slot 1"
I had this issue on my Aspire One as well. I don't recall the details
anymore, but here's the brief summary I wrote up after trying to
investigate the issue last August:
Keyboard does not work unless acpi o
201 - 219 of 219 matches
Mail list logo
