> > I'll say it again more clearly -- all of you whiners just plain suck.
> > We know you'll never write diffs, and it is up to you to prove us
> > wrong. If you don't write diffs, we have a difficult time feeling any
> > loss.
>
> a software community is made of more than developers.
Clearly, yo
That was the conversation in detail, nothing altered, nothing left
out, read and draw your own conclusions.
Conclusion: you are not contributing to the problem at all.
Sorry, I'm not angry, I'm focused and productive.
Nope, not productive at all in my opinion. Theo is right on the mark about
> > > The guy can be some stupid binary software with an "if(uid!=root) bail();"
> >
> > People running arbitrary binary software requiring root on their systems
> > deserve what they get. You can not work around this stupidity by ANY policy.
>
> that is not the case and is, in fact, the entire poi
# demo=""
# if [ "$demo" == "-n" -o "$demo" == "-e" ]; then
> echo bar
> fi
# demo="-n"
# if [ "$demo" == "-n" -o "$demo" == "-e" ]; then
> echo bar
> fi
ksh: [: -n: unexpected operator/operand
/home/lukeb
$ demo='-n'
/home/lukeb
$ if [[ $demo == '-n' || $demo == '-e' ]]; then print YUP; fi
YU
Hannah Schroeter wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 05:07:07PM +0200, Federico Giannici wrote:
>> My CD finally arrived and I immediately installed 3.9 in the first machine.
>>
>> I immediately found a problem for me: it seems that the GENERIC kernel
>> no longer support the procfs filesy
cmd1 2>&1 >$WHERE
This doesn't do what you think it does, which I'm assuming is redirect
stderr and stdout to $WHERE.
2) Is there a nice and "fast" method to check the latest changes with the cvs
command?
cvs has a diff command that is clearly described in the manual page:
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=cvs&apropos=0&sektion=0&manpath=OpenBSD+Current&arch=i386&format=html
> > > find /usr/src -name "*.[c|h]" -exec grep 'bpf.h' /dev/null {} \;
> >^(a) ^(b)
> >
> > (a) I doubt there are any file names ending in a pipe symbol in /usr/src.
> man ksh
The point being made is that '*.[ch]' is what you want. | does not
mean "or" in a characte
> I see old messages on various obsd related lists about ksh93 having
> been at least considered for a package and it not clear if it every
> was a package, but at any rate does not appear to be now.
>
> I wondered if there is development on that or maybe unofficial
> packages or something.
>
> The
9 matches
Mail list logo
