Yes it is.
After install, you copy ofwboot in your root of Mac OS X and after
reboot holding O + F+ ALT + APPLE ;) and type:
boot hd:,ofwboot /bsd
but you should simply read the install instruction:
ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/4.2/macppc/INSTALL.macppc
greetz
Konrad
2007/12/3, Paolo
... but I found out that
I never booted Linux so I do a dual boot now.
Regards
-Konrad
Hey misc,
so I know there is a better way to posting Bugs. But i not really got
all information needed to post it to bugs@ or better: i have the
information in a unpropper way. So I dont really mind if you not
answer i just thought it would be a nice information that my panic
happened.
So I insta
KET, SO_PFTAG, bla, &a);
Bye
Konrad
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream which had
a name of sockopt.diff]
So sorry its not a propper diff anymore but this is what i've done:
--- sys.bak/kern/uipc_socket.c Wed Mar 5 21:11:31 2008
+++ sys/kern/uipc_socket.c Thu Mar 6 06:50:29 2008
@@ -48,6 +48,8 @@
#include
#include
+#include
+
void filt_sordetach(struct knote *kn);
intfilt_soread(
Hey
so now I changed the tagging from tcp_output to ip_output.
I also put an pf_tag_unref to so_free and sosetopt (in case that there
is allready a tag set).
I couldn't see a reason for a pf_tag_unref in the so_accept because
the socket could be reused.
Thanks to Henning for the ideas!
Any furthe
> Nice, you probably want to keep the application/kernel tag name spaces
> distinct though. Otherwise it would be easy for any local user/program
> to mess with pf.conf generated tags and bypass filtering etc. It could
> be as easy as adding a prefix ("APP_" ?) to all application generated
> ta
> > I couldn't see a reason for a pf_tag_unref in the so_accept because
> > the socket could be reused.
>
> don't we need an additional ref (aka tagname2tag or the like), not unref,
> since the socket gets cloned?
>
if you want a diffrent tag on the resulting socket, then we have a
problem, bec
So now I added the ip6_output and I think i got a solution for the
accept, but I'm not 100% sure if that is enough. I tested it and it
looked fine. I couldn't test the ip6_output, because i don't have the
enviroment for it till now :) I'll hope to do this tommorw.
The '@'-thing is something comple
hmm so by the way.. it was a mistake form my side, the pf.conf takes
the @ if the rule is:
block out on fxp1 tagged "@foo"
instead of:
block out on fxp1 tagged @foo
I allready implement it and test it would work, the question for me
is, if the uid would be necessary and the namespace is enough,
stall
OpenBSD without this driver! I see that the driver is listed in the
man pages so i hope...
bye
Konrad
I had the same problem like Ikmal but now is alright!
2007/5/25, Ioan Nemes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
No problem here.
Ioan
>>> "Ikmal Ahmad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 05/25 1:18 pm >>>
Hi,
http://www.openbsd.org/
Forbidden
You don't have permission to access / on this server.
Apache/1.3.34 Server
Hey at all,
I know the most people dont like trolls and me too! But the last to
days I've laughed so often ... the misc@ list has a pretty cool humor,
for sure.
Bye
Konrad
Humppa,
this all is a proof that OpenBSD is much more than a ordinary OS
2007/7/19, Serge Basterot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 10:45:56AM +0200, Guido Tschakert wrote:
> Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
> > "Anton Karpov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> People who don't know ea
Hey List,
I've testing the installation after reading this thread on my ibook G4
(Mid 2005) and the installation in current faild by the devel/boost
port.
It ist not sooo important for me, because of the lack of nice color on
X but it would be funny.
bye Konrad
===> gnash-0.8.0p0 de
15 matches
Mail list logo
