membar-related compiler errors on sparc64

mbar #LoadLoad":::"memory") ^ :1:9: note: instantiated into assembly here membar #LoadLoad ^ I don't have any idea how to overcome this, any help would be appreciated. -- Kaashif Hymabaccus GPG: 3E810B04

System hangs after detecting radeondrm

Hello I have a sparc64 machine with no real graphics card, only the onboard Mach64 framebuffer. I found an ATI Radeon 9200 and decided to see if it works, then I could run X, test some graphical ports, etc. My problem is that with the GPU connected, the system hangs completely and is unresponsive

Re: System hangs after detecting radeondrm

On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 11:46:54AM +1100, Jonathan Gray wrote: > > radeon cards from sun with fcode > > xvr-100 (0x1002:0x5159 pci rv100) > xvr-300 (0x1002:0x5b64 pcie rv380) > I have heard of people changing the PCI option ROM in their Radeon cards to work on Suns, but only for e.g. the Radeon

Re: System hangs after detecting radeondrm

I now have an XVR-100 and have set it up as the output device in OpenBoot, but I have another problem. I have compiled a kernel from current source with DEBUG and DRMDEBUG for some more info, maybe someone knows how to fix this. Without the debug options, the last thing I see is "BIOS signature in

OpenBSD support for Lenovo Y50-70

the BIOS (or UEFI) and just use the Intel integrated graphics that comes with the i7-4720HQ CPU? There is KMS support for the Intel graphics, correct? Thanks in advance for any help. -- Kaashif Hymabaccus GPG: 3E810B04

Ruby, Python programs are unusually slow

When I start Python and Ruby programs (and probably others too), they are very, very slow to do anything and do not respond to SIGINT or SIGTERM. For example, when I run "rackup" in an almost bare Rack project (in Ruby), I have to wait for about 10 minutes before the web server starts. The same is

Re: Ruby, Python programs are unusually slow

On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 08:42:14PM +0200, Gregor Best wrote: > On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 05:52:12PM +0100, Kaashif Hymabaccus wrote: > > [...] > > I know this isn't a problem with my hardware (a ThinkPad T61) being > > slow, > > [...] > > Definitely, my

What to do about wordexp(3)?

ption is to send patches to all of the projects using wordexp and get them to stop using it, but that's not practical. Isn't there something else that can be done, or is getting everyone to stop using it the only option? -- Kaashif Hymabaccus GPG: 2048R/3E810B04

Re: What to do about wordexp(3)?

author and ask him if he will stop using wordexp() in the future. If not, I suppose he'll have lost a user. Thanks for the reassurance that wordexp() is still bad. -- Kaashif Hymabaccus GPG: 2048R/3E810B04