I've run into this issue as well in past versions. Set this in /etc/sysctl.conf
kern.timecounter.hardware=acpitimer0
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 3:25 PM, André Stöbe wrote:
> Rodolfo Gouveia wrote:
>> I have had this issue that time stops under my 5.3 AMD64 VM
>> running on top of VMware ESXi 5.
>
>
Best option I see here is a dup-to packets to an interface with IDS
listening and give it the ability to add IP addresses to a blacklist and
flush all states associated with them.
PF is a kernel space item, and you want to keep this as simple as possible
to minimize bugs. Leave complex stuff like
Hello, I've got a few machines I'm setting up which I noticed ACPI0 is
generating a lot of constant interrupts which appears to be consuming
system time on CPU0 up to 80%. I think other interrupts are still
getting time to process, but I'm not sure if it could still cause a
performance impact as I'
would need to do a full upgrade? Thanks for the help so
far!
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Mike Larkin wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 08:55:15AM -0500, Josh Hoppes wrote:
>> Hello, I've got a few machines I'm setting up which I noticed ACPI0 is
>> generating a lot of con
> The change was just in the kernel, but unless you wanted to go and pull
> out that one patch and apply it to an older tree, you might be better off
> installing a complete snap.
Ok, I was hoping I could just drop in the kernel from a snapshot since
it's harder to revert from an full upgrade in a
Mike,
Looks like the July 5th snapshot is working great. Thanks for the help.
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Mike Larkin wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 09:51:12AM -0700, Mike Larkin wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 11:36:21AM -0500, Josh Hoppes wrote:
>> > Would there ha
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Paquitiu wrote:
> Hi.
> The issue is simple, I can't match the outgoing traffic to carp ip address.
> When I go to some "show myip" web, it always appears the pysical one.
> Never the carp one.
>
> As my ISP provider gives us 4 ips, I use two (one for each nic of
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=route&apropos=0&sektion=0&manpath=OpenBSD+Current&arch=i386&format=html
Route has a -blackhole option, so you might try "route add -blackhole
0.0.0.0/0 127.0.0.1"
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 7:47 AM, Bernd wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I'd like to blackhole some
I'm trying to configure bgpd to run in an alternate routing table so I
can use it to manage black holed prefixes. When trying to specify an
alternate routing table I get the error message "rtable id 1 does not
exist" when starting bgpd. I've gone through route(8) and route(4) but
can't find any inf
Hi,
>
> You missed rdomain.
> On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 01:26:37 +0700, Josh Hoppes
> wrote:
>
>> I'm trying to configure bgpd to run in an alternate routing table so I
>> can use it to manage black holed prefixes. When trying to specify an
>> alternate routing tabl
Thanks for the help and for the better understanding of routing
domains and tables. In the end I was over thinking the problem and
didn't actually need the additional routing table.
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Claudio Jeker
wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 09:40:44AM +0300, Gregory Edigarov
I've not been able to test the diff yet, but I'm certainly interested
in that functionality.
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Claudio Jeker
wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 10:20:38PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 01:57:10PM -0500, Josh Hoppes wrote:
Why are you using "set nexthop self" and then trying to change that
with the filter "allow quick to 172.29.1.52 set nexthop 172.29.1.200".
If you don't want your nexthop to be yourself don't tell bgpd to do
that.
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 4:08 AM, Tony Sarendal wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 11:0
pfsync has been using multicast by default for a long time, I think
possibly from the start. You have to explicitly define a "syncpeer" if
you want it unicast. The list probably ignored the question because
the answer was clear in the documentation.
The only limitation I've seen lately to OpenBSD pushing packets is how
many interrupts it can handle. I don't know if 5.0 has helped with
this but 4.9 still appeared to be limited to CPU0 for processing
interrupts.
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> 5.0 may be able to do th
I'm pretty sure IPv6 forwarding and accepting routing advertisements
will be a necessity going forward. At the current time I don't know of
any other way to dynamically find the default route in IPv6, necessary
for end user gateways on consumer ISPs. Even using DHCPv6 your default
gateway is found
mforwarding is for multicast forwarding and multipath is to enable
multiple paths for the same destination network segment.
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Doug Milam wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I want to be sure that the following two sysctl variables are not needed for
> a basic internet router/gatew
You could try using the tag option in the configuration, and then have
a rule in your
pf.conf act on that tag to do what ever you need.
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Brian McCann wrote:
> Hi all. I've been using relayd for about 6 months or so now on OpenBSD
4.4.
> I'm quite happy with it, b
I should clarify that the tag option is usable as an option to a
redirection, and not a relay if I understand the man page correctly.
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Josh Hoppes wrote:
> You could try using the tag option in the configuration, and then have
> a rule in your
> pf.co
I've had decent luck with VirtualBox as of late, in previous versions
VirtualBox would cause problems at install time bugging out when
extracting packages.
I've never had a problem with VMware though, but my experience is
limited. I've been running it under ESXi 4.0 for a while and it's been
very
If I'm reading the man page correctly the rule only counts if it's the
one creating a state. Since the match rule won't be the deciding one
to generate a state or not I expect it will never actually count on
those statistics.
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 8:48 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
> I am apparently n
21 matches
Mail list logo
