On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 7:10 AM, David Gwynne wrote:
>
> On 20/04/2011, at 11:08 PM, Jonathan Lassoff wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 4:22 AM, David Gwynne wrote:
>>> you might be able to upgrade your passive firewall to 4.9 next to the
>>> active 4.7 one.
I'm having a bit of an issue with OpenOSPFd on 4.7 running on i386 hardware.
The gist of the problem is that it seems that changes to the kernel
routing table and/or interfaces are not being synchronized into the
OSPF RIB and LSDB.
As an example, I have a CARP interface called "carp17" that is
co
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 7:14 PM, David Gwynne wrote:
> i had this same problem and fixed it in time for the 4.8 release. is it
> possible you can upgrade?
Do you mean that this was an issue in 4.7 that was fixed in 4.8?
I most definitely plan to upgrade (all the way to 4.9, most likely),
but am
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 4:22 AM, David Gwynne wrote:
> you might be able to upgrade your passive firewall to 4.9 next to the active
> 4.7 one. it looks like the protocol stayed the same so they should be able to
> talk to each other.
This would seem to be the case.
This (http://undeadly.org/cg
4 matches
Mail list logo
