Greetings All,
I have a softraid device, sd3, which was created as follows:
bioctl -c 1 -l /dev/sd0a,/dev/sd1a,/dev/sd2a softraid0
The chunk sd2a failed. bioctl shows the RAID1 as degraded, and chunk sd2a
as OFFLINE.
In order to rebuild, I'd need to set up the new sd2. After replacing and
zer
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 8:10 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 07:50:41AM -0400, John Hynes wrote:
> > Greetings All,
> >
> > I have a softraid device, sd3, which was created as follows:
> >
> > bioctl -c 1 -l /dev/sd0a,/dev/sd1a,/dev/sd2a
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 8:07 AM, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 07:50:41AM -0400, John Hynes wrote:
> > Greetings All,
> >
> > I have a softraid device, sd3, which was created as follows:
> >
> > bioctl -c 1 -l /dev/sd0a,/dev/sd1a,/dev/sd2a
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 08:17:27AM -0400, John Hynes wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 8:10 AM, Stefan Sperling
> wrote:
> > > What commands did you run to "copy" the disklabel?
> > Oh - I did a &quo
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 8:51 AM, Bret Lambert wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 02:30:23PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 08:17:27AM -0400, John Hynes wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 8:10 AM, Stefan Sperling
> wrote:
> > > > What c
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Nick Holland
wrote:
> On 09/02/13 08:19, John Hynes wrote:
> ...
> > The "new" sd2 is identical to the old, which is identical to the other
> > disks.
>
> you provide ZERO proof of this, which makes me guess that you buy disks
Hi All,
Issue: There is one host to whom I can't send mail from either of my relays
(both OpenBSD 5.3, sendmail). It always fails the TLS handshake. If I
attempt to debug it by hand by running:
openssl s_client -starttls smtp -connect mail.dean.edu:25
...from any of my OpenBSD 5.3 hosts, I get
Thanks Claus - the option did work, so I'll go with the patch.
-John
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Claus Assmann wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013, John Hynes wrote:
>
> > openssl s_client -starttls smtp -connect mail.dean.edu:25
> >
> > ...from any of my Open
Nevermind - I mistype the define - it works.
Thanks again,
-John
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 5:10 PM, John Hynes wrote:
> After applying the patch, and recompiling with SSL_OP_NO_TLSv1_2, sendmail
> still gives the same error, although the -no-tls1_2 option gets the test to
> work
After applying the patch, and recompiling with SSL_OP_NO_TLSv1_2, sendmail
still gives the same error, although the -no-tls1_2 option gets the test to
work.
Are there other defines I need perhaps?
-John
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Claus Assmann wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013, John Hy
I'm having some trouble figuring out what is causing a systemic performance
issue. By "systemic" I mean that running even seemingly trivial things
(i.e. 'ls' on a directory with only a few files in it) is accompanied by a
substantial delay before any response, say, of 15-30 seconds. Not *every*
s
n that's taking forever to
complete?
Thanks,
-John
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 9:39 PM, Kenneth R Westerback <
kwesterb...@rogers.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 07:04:44PM -0600, Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 30, 2013, at 03:55 PM, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> >
12 matches
Mail list logo
