Re: OpenBSD - Vlans - CISCO

2006-12-08 Thread Jeffrey C. Ollie
On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 09:25 -0500, michel bC)dard wrote: > Hi, > > I have connected my OpenBSD box to a CISCO switch model 2924. I decided > to setup vlans and I did the configuration on the CISCO. There is one > port where all the trafic goes on the CISCO switch. This is what I did > on the firew

Re: Groklaw artical about the BSD license

2007-01-17 Thread Jeffrey C. Ollie
On Wed, 2007-01-17 at 08:28 +0100, Marc Balmer wrote: > Marco Peereboom wrote: > > > along. The GPL is fatally flawed and hasn't been tested in court. I > > wouldn't bet my code or company on it. > > the GPL actually has been tested in court in germany. > I lack the details, but using google they

Re: SIP on OpenBSD

2007-02-13 Thread Jeffrey C. Ollie
On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 14:46 -0500, Nick ! wrote: > On 2/13/07, Karel Kulhavy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 11:53:04AM +0100, Alessio Cappelli wrote: > > > Hi, did you know about OpenPBX? > > > > PBX==Private Branch Exchange. I want a SIP phone, not a SIP exchange. > > Or is

Re: Sangoma S518 PCI ADSL Modem

2007-04-17 Thread Jeffrey C. Ollie
On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 14:39 -0600, Chris 'Xenon' Hanson wrote: > The driver is open source, and there is an (old) version > of it integrated into the OBSD kernel. I doubt this old driver is something you want to > mess with though. > >There is some sort of special-purpose processor on the card

Re: Sangoma S518 PCI ADSL Modem

2007-04-17 Thread Jeffrey C. Ollie
On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 15:51 -0600, Chris 'Xenon' Hanson wrote: > Jeffrey C. Ollie wrote: > > Unfortunately there is quite a bit of code in the Sangoma drivers that > > are binary blobs with no source. It's more than just firmware that is > > loaded onto the car

Re: Prevent circumventing dansguardian with pf

2007-05-04 Thread Jeffrey C. Ollie
On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 09:47 -0400, Bret Lambert wrote: > On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 07:26 -0600, Open Phugu wrote: > > > if you deny icmp, you shall burn in hell > > You may burn in hell, but ICMP can be used to infiltrate and exfiltrate data: > > http://www.cs.uit.no/~daniels/PingTunnel/ > > This looks

Re: OT: flowcharts

2007-05-17 Thread Jeffrey C. Ollie
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 13:02 -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote: > > If you _really_ want actual flow-charts, I just use Xfig or a piece of > paper. Inkscape also has been getting some features useful for flowcharts in recent releases. Jeff [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pg

Re: Packets Per Second Limit?

2007-05-31 Thread Jeffrey C. Ollie
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 12:18 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Anyone know the maximum packets per second that can traverse a 100MB > internet link. From what I've been able to gather its about 8300 or so? Is > this number accurate? Do connections just start to timeout once I hit this > limit? I'm a

Re: openbsd on cisco hardware?

2006-11-13 Thread Jeffrey C. Ollie
On Sun, 2006-11-12 at 20:51 -0600, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote: > i know this is likely not possible for a number of reasons but i figured i'd > ask: are there or have there been any plans to port openbsd to run on cisco > hardware? It would only be interesting if you were able to develop drivers for

Re: openbsd on cisco hardware?

2006-11-13 Thread Jeffrey C. Ollie
On Mon, 2006-11-13 at 15:12 -0600, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote: > > bingo! i wanted to see if i could use a 2620 i had laying around for its T1 line > card and this is why i didn't expect it to be possible. > > the ISP here at work supplies a couple T1 lines which terminate into 1721s and > i'd very mu

Re: for the OpenBSD Asterisk VoIP admins

2006-11-15 Thread Jeffrey C. Ollie
On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 16:55 +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asterisk_PBX] > > Asterisk's timing mechanism (both timestamps and wake-ups) is strongly > > biased toward systems which contain at least one of Digium's PCI boards. > > Users with other needs, including pu

Re: Quagga and OpenBGP

2006-11-30 Thread Jeffrey C. Ollie
On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 01:40 +0800, Demuel I. Bendano, R.E.E wrote: > All, > > I cannot still see the logic as to why Quagga is part of the OpenBSD ports > tree when it has OpenBGP at all in the default install? The documentation > of OpenBGP tells us that it is far superior in design as compared to