read the man page a bit more carfully around how the auth keyword works.
you probably dont want auth on that line.
--
Jason Barbier | E: jab...@serversave.us
GPG Key-ID: B5F75B47(http://kusuriya.devio.us/pubkey.asc)
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015, at 08:13 AM, Krzysztof Strzeszewski wrote:
> He
It is a read only site, the privacy you seek is breached as soon as you
make a DNS call to openbsd.org
--
Jason Barbier | E: jab...@serversave.us
GPG Key-ID: B5F75B47(http://kusuriya.devio.us/pubkey.asc)
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015, at 09:58 AM, szs wrote:
> Not for security.
> For p
either AMD nor Intel
sells
32-bit chips anymore. If OpenBSD remains stuck at 32 bits, people will
stop
using and developing for it.
Who makes the decision to keep OpenBSD off of 64-bit Intel? And why
the
hell are they doing so?
-jash
--
Jason Barbier
C:(206)650-6542|E:jab...@serversave.us
On 1/4/2013 3:42 PM, Friedrich Locke wrote:
Hi folks!
I have a windows desktop and would like to install a virtualization
software in order to have two virtual machine. I pretend to install OpenBSD
on both of them.
Which virtualization solution would be the best one for OpenBSD to run on ?
Tha
ution Intel.
Now if you have no concern for the integrated GPU and plan on using a
GPU that is supported I always say AMD. More performance for the price
and to me seems more stable under multithreaded load.
--
Jason Barbier
tions but its almost always Asus or Thinkpad.
--
Jason Barbier
I just finished setting this up myself for DDNS updates
On 2/3/2013 6:19 AM, Loïc BLOT wrote:
I confirm dynamic dns updates works with OpenBSD named, but you must
replace OpenBSD dhcpd with isc-dhcpd from packages, failover and dynamic
dns updates works with it
--
Jason Barbier
imap
> - reliable and secure
>
Your probably going to have to suck it up at some point and use +
delmiters like most people have moved to doing since according to the
RFC - is a valid email address char. But with that rant out of the way
honestly if you are not opposed to running your own
>If we are in such dire need of an init system replacement, why has
there not been widespread frenzy as >with schedulers, package managers,
packet filters, programming languages and so forth?
Maybe because people don't seem to think the same thing, or feel the
urgency to replace it. But a dece
On 11/22/2013 10:50 AM, Rick Pettit wrote:
Lewis,
If censorship is your thing, why don’t you start by censoring yourself.
What you are asking for here is offensive.
-Rick
+1
On Nov 22, 2013, at 12:26 PM, Paolo Aglialoro wrote:
Il 22/nov/2013 19:07 "J. Lewis Muir" ha scritto:
On 11/22/1
In my personal setup to prevent data leakage id leave the internal
adapters bridged then remove the external adapter from the bridge, then
for IPv4 you can just do standard natting for anything that needs to
leave the network but doesnt need to hit the proxy using the rdr-to
rules, then IPv6 is
On 02/02/14 11:45, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
Christian Weisgerber [na...@mips.inka.de] wrote:
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/csec-used-airport-wi-fi-to-track-canadian-travellers-edward-snowden-documents-1.2517881
If you didn't know already, this is your cue to look up ifconfig(8)'s
"lladdr random
Whatever crack that user was smoking I need to know what it was so I
never partake of it.
On , openda...@hushmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Are OpenBSD's packages extremely outdated? What would you say to this
guy?
"At least with Linux I don't have to wait 6 hours for all my software
to finish compil
13 matches
Mail list logo
