Re: Wouldn't `daemon_enable=YES` make more sense than `daemon_flags=""` in rc.conf.local?

2015-01-28 Thread James Ryland Miller
>Due to OpenBSD's excellent "convention over configuration" (1), most people >don't need flags. As a brand new OpenBSD user, I *love* how the flags work in rc.conf.local: "" says to me that the daemon is being called with no flags. "YES" doesn't tell me that; it just tells me that I might have

Re: Wouldn't `daemon_enable=YES` make more sense than `daemon_flags=""` in rc.conf.local?

2015-01-28 Thread James Ryland Miller
>Or you can just learn that ${daemon_flags} does both - enables/disables >the daemon in question and sets its flags (if any). Exactly. On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 6:16 PM, J Sisson wrote: > On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 4:05 PM, wrote: >> Indeed, `daemon_flags="YES"` wouldn't make any sense at all. What

Re: Wouldn't `daemon_enable=YES` make more sense than `daemon_flags=""` in rc.conf.local?

2015-01-30 Thread James Ryland Miller
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 5:49 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2015-01-28, James Ryland Miller wrote: >> As a brand new OpenBSD user, I *love* how the flags work in rc.conf.local: >> >> "" says to me that the daemon is being called with no flags. > > Unfort