On Dec 28, 2007 7:51 AM, Erik Wikstrvm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2007-12-28 07:33, Brian Hansen wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > Is he right?
>
> Yes and no. First of all you should realise that Linus and most other
> other kernel hackers are biased. When it comes down to it C++ is not a
> better or
On Dec 28, 2007 11:21 AM, Pieter Verberne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 10:16:08AM -0500, Gary Baluha wrote:
> > I think that's one of the main problems with programmers today. All the
> > schools I know that teach programming, start by teachin
On Dec 28, 2007 12:36 PM, Marc Espie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rules for types and operators are fairly complex, granted, but there is
> some actual logic. This is well documented in a few books. The main issue
> with C++ there is that it it a big language. You want to understand those
> rules
On Dec 27, 2007 10:41 PM, Douglas A. Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd wire in a hardware-type heartbeat detector that will power-cycle the
> computer if it stops working. I'd have a door over the money slot
> powered by the computer so that it only accepts money when its working.
> You coul
> > > 2) using more free software is better than not running it at all
> > > 3) incentivating usage of non-free software on free software operating
> > >systems doesn't incentivate the creation of free software
> replacements
> >
> > this is a word play. I know people who used OpenBSD for
> > There are also quite a few free programs that run only on Windows.
> > (Being able to redistribute a program and its source and modify and
> > redistribute the source doesn't somehow cause it to be instantly
> > ported to other platforms by the grace of God.) These programs can be
> > run on ot
On Jan 7, 2008 12:14 PM, Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>IMO, a big part of the problem here is that when you say "recommend" in
>this context what you actually mean appears (based on the discussion
>here) to be something that most people would express as "not
>deliber
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 9:14 AM, J.C. Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I'll see what I can dig up. My fear is the brand name "Creator3D" is
> used on multiple products with vastly differing hardware. I might have
> one (or more) of them here collecting dust. Most of my sun hadware is
> SS20 an
http://www.theregister.com/2007/06/27/intel_core2_duo_bios_fix/
"Intel has released a BIOS patch for Windows machines running Core 2 and
Xeon 3000/5000 chips that addresses potential unpredictable system
behavior."
After reading the whole article, it sounds like Intel is attempting to
address som
9 matches
Mail list logo
