an ISP could do?
> >
> > Is it a cost issue?
>
> no, a lack of brain issue. v6 is broken by design in a thousand ways
> and way worse than you can imagine. of course it has been detailed
> here numerous times.
So what are you going to do when all of IPv4 is exhausted?
ps they
> > > slowly are becoming so, but all other physical mediums share these
> > > problems of obscelence and delivery. I think (hope?) that people buy
> > > our releases for the art, and as an opportunity to give back to
> > > sustain the project (or in Euro
add 6to4 mode sit ttl 64 remote any local 192.88.99.1
see how I can have "remote any" ?
Is something similar possible in OpenBSD?
Thanks.
--
Garry Dolley
ARP Networks, Inc. | http://www.arpnetworks.com | (818) 206-0181
Data center, VPS, and IP Transit solutions
Member Los Angeles
Correction to my subject, I meant s/git0/gif0/
On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 06:31:35AM -0700, Garry Dolley wrote:
> Dear misc,
>
> Is it possible to have a git0 tunnel that accepts a remote endpoint
> of any address? I'm trying to set up a 6to4 anycast relay router.
>
> Wh
On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 02:17:41PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2009-04-03, Garry Dolley wrote:
> > Dear misc,
> >
> > Is it possible to have a git0 tunnel that accepts a remote endpoint
> > of any address? I'm trying to set up a 6to4 anycast relay rout
On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 04:24:09PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 04:19:34PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2009/04/03 16:00, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 02:17:41PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > > On 2
On Sat, Apr 04, 2009 at 11:50:08AM +0200, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> Garry Dolley wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 02:17:41PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >> On 2009-04-03, Garry Dolley wrote:
> >>> Dear misc,
> >>>
> >>> Is it possibl
|| vlan100/
> | server | *
> ||
> !____!
That's a nice ASCII diagram :)
--
Garry Dolley
ARP Networks, Inc. | http://www.arpnetworks.com | (818) 206-0181
Data center, VPS, and IP Transit solutions
Member Lo
4 on amd64 arch. Stock GENERIC kernel.
I'm sure it's simple but I don't deal w/ OpenBSD routers much.
Thanks.
--
Garry Dolley
ARP Networks, Inc. | http://www.arpnetworks.com | (818) 206-0181
Data center, VPS, and IP Transit solutions
Member Los Angeles County REACT, Uni
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 11:56:51PM -0500, Todd T. Fries wrote:
> I believe you want:
>
> $ sudo route add -inet6 -net -blackhole 2607:f2f8:: -prefixlen 32 ::1
Hi Todd,
Works great, thanks!
--
Garry Dolley
ARP Networks, Inc. | http://www.arpnetworks.com | (818) 206-0181
Data center,
ut. Did not investigate further.
>
>
> Simon
I had another customer on amd64 report this problem today. Not sure
what the solution is. I'm recommending either downgrade to 5.0 or
use i386 arch for now.
--
Garry Dolley
ARP Networks, Inc. | http://www.arpnetworks.com | (818) 206-0181
Data
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 03:31:27PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> In gmane.os.openbsd.misc, Garry Dolley wrote:
> > On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 07:58:30PM -0400, Simon Perreault wrote:
> >> On 2012-05-08 19:08, Per-Olov Sjvholm wrote:
> >>> It says "
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 03:31:27PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> In gmane.os.openbsd.misc, Garry Dolley wrote:
> > On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 07:58:30PM -0400, Simon Perreault wrote:
> >> On 2012-05-08 19:08, Per-Olov Sjvholm wrote:
> >>> It says "
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 09:13:30AM -0400, Simon Perreault wrote:
> On 2012-05-11 04:15, Garry Dolley wrote:
>> I now have an amd64 test VM set up, where I installed stock 5.0.
>>
>> I ran a lot of traffic over em0 without any timeouts.
>
> That's expected. 5.0 has b
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 09:13:30AM -0400, Simon Perreault wrote:
> On 2012-05-11 04:15, Garry Dolley wrote:
>> I now have an amd64 test VM set up, where I installed stock 5.0.
>>
>> I ran a lot of traffic over em0 without any timeouts.
>
> That's expected. 5.0 has b
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 03:19:07AM -0700, Garry Dolley wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 09:13:30AM -0400, Simon Perreault wrote:
> > On 2012-05-11 04:15, Garry Dolley wrote:
> >> I now have an amd64 test VM set up, where I installed stock 5.0.
> >>
> >> I ran a
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 01:54:54AM +0200, Per-Olov Sjvholm wrote:
> On 17 maj 2012, at 12:53, Garry Dolley wrote:
>
> > On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 03:19:07AM -0700, Garry Dolley wrote:
> >> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 09:13:30AM -0400, Simon Perreault wrote:
> >>> On 201
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 04:40:08PM +0200, Per-Olov Sjvholm wrote:
>
>
> On 19 maj 2012, at 08:11, Garry Dolley wrote:
>
> > On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 01:54:54AM +0200, Per-Olov Sjvholm wrote:
> >> On 17 maj 2012, at 12:53, Garry Dolley wrote:
> >>
> >&
ction? How
Yes. For the record I run it on OpenBSD 4.4; IPv6 traffic only.
While there have been some quirks over the years, I've never seen it
quit.
--
Garry Dolley
ARP Networks, Inc. | http://www.arpnetworks.com | (818) 206-0181
Data center, VPS, and IP Transit solutions
Member Los Angele
newer KVM or
upstream QEMU has fixed the bugs that make 4.5+ not work out of the
box.
--
Garry Dolley
ARP Networks, Inc. | http://www.arpnetworks.com | (818) 206-0181
Data center, VPS, and IP Transit solutions
Member Los Angeles County REACT, Unit 336 | WQGK336
Blog http://scie.nti.st
> >
> > > Set the nic to e1000 in KVM
> >
> > but this was not successful, either. I got a bunch of:
> >
> > em0: watchdog timeout -- resetting
> >
> > and
> >
> > "No DHCPOFFERS received."
>
> I tried to upgrade my 4.5
21 matches
Mail list logo
