Hi all,
I'm sending this e-mail since I have found other users in this
mailing-list using the same device without issues.
I'm using a "Protectli FW1" with FreeBSD 12.1 amd64 as a firewall which
is serving me with great performances and no issues at all. The
appliance has 4 Intel Gigabit 8258
or sharing your experience!
On 2020-06-10 21:59, obs...@loopw.com wrote:
I have a small fleet of protectli firewalls, all of them with em nics.
Only the units i’ve upgraded to 6.7 are showing interface errors,
where 6.6 is definitely not.
On Jun 8, 2020, at 5:30 PM, Gabri Tofano wrote:
Hi al
time traffic is the most affected one as very sensitive and I
keep \
having spikes meanwhile playing online.
Thank you!
Gabri
On 2020-06-10 22:46, Gabri Tofano wrote:
That's funny because when I received your e-mail I was almost done in
installing OpenBSD 6.6. Another user pointed out to
Hi All,
I am trying to move to relayd (OpenBSD 6.7) from HAproxy by keeping my
config to serve multiple domains in SSL passthrough but I'm having some
difficulties. If I correctly understand, according to the man page it
looks like that redirections are used for passthrough traffic and relays
for
:443 empty
4 host172.16.101.32 0.00% down
The low availability is due too the web servers were turned off.
Thanks!
On 2020-07-10 17:41, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
Gabri Tofano(ga...@tofanos.com) on 2020.07.07 15:38:17 -0400:
When using redirections, no listening
Does http work with redirects? It wasn’t clear if it did or not in
your first post.
It doesn't work with http and that is the redirect that I was testing.
Indications from your pf anchor rules and the down
status above, and the check http attribute on the https forward to
directives tell me r
On 2020-07-11 06:33, Brian Brombacher wrote:
On Jul 10, 2020, at 11:42 PM, Gabri Tofano wrote:
Does http work with redirects? It wasn’t clear if it did or not in
your first post.
It doesn't work with http and that is the redirect that I was testing.
Indications from your pf a
before
getting coffee in the morning :)
I’m going to play around on my boxes and try and come up with some
options for you.
I’ll get back to you later.
Thank you for dedicating time in looking to this issue!
On 2020-07-11 12:08, Brian Brombacher wrote:
On Jul 11, 2020, at 11:20 AM, Gabri Tofano
if want to implement it)
Thank you to the community and the devs for the great work on this OS!
Especially
on the man pages :)
On 2020-07-11 12:58, Gabri Tofano wrote:
It isn’t. rdr-to, and by extension redirects, are not natting the
source address.
Clients connecting through relayd and to t
and 192.168.89.13 is the relayd rdr
"target".
HTH,
--
pb
On 2020-07-13 01:08, Gabri Tofano wrote:
After some further troubleshooting, tonight I took some time to sit
down and
read again the man pages as everything on my config files was looking
fine and
no errors were showing up in any
I did but still negative. No sessions shown in relayctl so still
thinking it's an issue in pf.
On 2020-07-13 22:51, Brian Brombacher wrote:
On Jul 13, 2020, at 8:30 PM, Gabri Tofano wrote:
I have tried to implement the workaround as per man page
but it still doesn't work, here t
wrote:
I have a small fleet of protectli firewalls, all of them with em nics.
Only the units i’ve upgraded to 6.7 are showing interface errors,
where 6.6 is definitely not.
On Jun 8, 2020, at 5:30 PM, Gabri Tofano wrote:
Hi all,
I'm sending this e-mail since I have found other users in
12 matches
Mail list logo