f
Kai Mosebach
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 10:19 PM
To: Florian Fuessl
Cc: 'Michel Le Cocq'; misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: intel pro/1000 PT & PF
Does this also apply to amd64 ?
Thanks Kai
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I just wanted to know if the network cards
Hi,
Has anyone already tried to use multipath routing for equal BGP4 peer routes
or are there any plans to implement this feature into OpenBGPD?
-Florian
welcome ;-)
-Florian
-Original Message-
From: Gregory Edigarov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2007 4:51 PM
To: Florian Fuessl
Subject: Re: multipath routing with OpenBGPD
Florian Fuessl wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Has anyone already tried to use multip
2:31 PM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: multipath routing with OpenBGPD
On 11/3/07, Florian Fuessl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Gregory,
>
> we have multiple redundant FE upstream peerings to the same AS. So I guess
> the best solution would be in our case to let th
Hi,
I'm running spamd-setup via regular cronjob every 20 minutes. Sometimes the
spamd-setup process seems to hang and does not finish within this period,
although all black- and whitelists are local files.
Is there a way define timeouts for tasks of spamd-setup? What solution is
recommended for t
"Peter N. M. Hansteen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I'm running spamd-setup via regular cronjob every 20 minutes. Sometimes
the
>> spamd-setup process seems to hang and does not finish within this period,
>> although all black- and whitelists are local files.
>
> I would try to figure out why th
Frank Bax wrote:
>
> My spamd-setup always takes 20-30 minutes on two servers (4.1 and 4.2).
> This is not normal? When I run it manually; most of the time is
> spent
> downloading traplist.gz
>
> This morning, I changed the crontab "time /usr/libexec/spamd-setup -d"
>
> 4.1 runtimes (minute
Strange thing here is that spamd-setup sometimes hangs although all
spamd.conf entries point to local copied traplists downloaded by a separate
cron process. :-|
-Flo
> -Original Message-
> Of Mike Erdely
> Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 7:54 PM
>
> You could point to a local copy (/v
Behalf Of
Florian Fuessl
Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2008 12:14 PM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: spamd-setup hangup/timeout settings
Hi,
I'm running spamd-setup via regular cronjob every 20 minutes. Sometimes the
spamd-setup process seems to hang and does not finish within this period,
although
"Peter N. M. Hansteen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> "Florian Fuessl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Increasing "kern.maxclusters" has solved the problem here. :)
>
> It would be interesting to hear a bit more about which val
Hi,
I have problems with an OpenBSD 3.9 GENERIC.MP#0 i386 machine causing
uvm_fault crashes:
uvm_fault(0xd05cc640, 0xedbe2000, 0, 3) -> e
kernel page fault trap, code=0
Stopped at memset+0x33: repe stosl %es:(%edi)
The system in question is a Fujitsu Siemens Primergy P200 system with
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Marcus Popp
>
> On 2007-01-05T13:47, Florian Fuessl wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have problems with an OpenBSD 3.9 GENERIC.MP#0 i386 machine causing
>> uvm_fault crashes:
>> [...]
>>
Hi,
the new ICP-Vortex ICP90x4RO (ICP SCSI U320 - PCI-X) SCSI-RAID controllers
do not seem to be supported by the OpenBSD gdt-module.
Are there any workarounds or plans to support the new ICP-Vortex
RAID-hardware within the next release?
- Flo
Hi,
try adding the following lines to your /etc/pf.conf and reload with pfctl -f
/etc/pf.conf
set limit tables 5000 # default 1000
set limit table-entries 500 # default 10
Guess this should solve your problem...
- Florian
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [
Hi,
MailEnable seem to have problems connecting to OpenBSD spamd in greylisting
mode and stuttering enabled.
MailEnable is unable to detect the "220 ." string and timeouts the
connection to spamd after a few seconds with a connection error.
Patched now spamd to send the "220 ." as a com
> Hello all,
>
> I just wanted to know if the network cards :
> - - intel pro/1000 PT quad port
Works fine here with 4.1 :)
> - - intel pro/1000 PF (SX) quad port
>
> are surported by 4.1
>
> I can found the 1000MT or 1000MF on the hardware page, but they are
> "only" with 2 connector.
>
> Tha
Hi,
one of our OpenBSD 4.2 HP ProLiant machines hanged up today repeating the
following messages:
sd0(ciss0:0:0): cannot allocate scsi xs
sd0: not queued, error 12
sd0(ciss0:0:0): cannot allocate scsi xs
sd0: not queued, error 12
sd0(ciss0:0:0): cannot allocate scsi xs
sd0: not queued, error 12
[.
Hi,
is there a particular reason, why you have to use bind as resolver? If not,
I would try out running a DNS-recursor (PowerDNS-recursor, djbdns, ...)
which may offer more performance and maybe less pain in the future ;)
-Florian
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[
Quagga is not only a BGP routing software, it's a collection of many routing
daemons.
The syntax is almost comparable to the Cisco syntax, which makes it possible
to let Quagga-routers be maintained by almost everyone who knows to handle
Cisco products.
Nevertheless the OpenBSD port of Quagga is
Hi,
we are using spamd of OpenBSD 3.9 in greylisting mode with the following
options in rc.conf:
spamd_flags="-v -G 25:4:864 -r451"
spamd_grey=YES
. and the greyscanner perl script from Bob Beck.
The results in fighting against spam are really unbelievable great, but
unfortunately spamd crashes
Hi,
current route6d does not add advertised RipNG routes of other systems to the
routing table. This problem seems to go back to 2008, as older OpenBSD
releases do also suffer from this problem, here.
Using route6d build from Jul. 3, 2007 does add advertised RipNG routes to
the kernel routing tab
ash memory are also
welcome. :)
I'd like to implement native IPv6 support for our CPEs, but dynamic prefix
delegation and routing seem to be a pain without using IPv4 tunnels, yet.
-Florian
Florian Fuessl wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> current route6d does not add advertised RipNG routes of ot
Hi Henning,
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-m...@[...] on Behalf
> Of Henning Brauer
> Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 2:39 PM
> Subject: Re: Defending OpenBSD Performance
>
> * Nick [2009-09-15 13:52]:
> > [...]
>
> i have a bgp machine forwarding 800MBit/s of real world generic
>
Hi Peter,
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf
> Of Peter N. M. Hansteen
> [...]
>
> So I'm considering setting up a consolidated greytrap list to
> supplement uatraps and others, if other greytrappers out there are
> willing to sha
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-m...@[...] On Behalf of Bob Beck
> [...]
>
> Exactly what are yo consolidating here peter? If it is blacklists or
> traplists from various sources, I think this may do people a
> disservice.
> The problem if you are aggregating the traplists is that users
25 matches
Mail list logo
