Installboot uses wrong device for secondary boot loader

I’m installing 6.3 on a RAID1. Install was fine until ending with an error message, “invalid boot record signature…”. I manually ran installboot: >. installboot -v -r /mnt sd4 Hand transcription: Using /mnt as root Installing bootstrap on /dev/rsd4c Using first-stage /mnt/usr/mdec/biosboot, se

Re: Installboot uses wrong device for secondary boot loader

Apr 29, 2018, at 4:01 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote: > >> On 2018-04-29, Eric Zylstra wrote: >> I’m installing 6.3 on a RAID1. Install was fine until ending with an error >> message, “invalid boot record signature…”. >> >> I manually ran installboot: >>

Re: Installboot uses wrong device for secondary boot loader

, EZ > On Apr 29, 2018, at 8:58 AM, Eric Zylstra <mailto:ezyls...@mac.com>> wrote: > > Interesting. I’ll look into that. Not sure why installboot, upon seeing an > error condition (missing MBR), would not generate an error but instead try > another device. > &g

Re: openbsd.org down?

ezylstra ~ % traceroute openbsd.org traceroute to openbsd.org (129.128.5.194), 64 hops max, 52 byte packets 1 dslrouter (192.168.0.1) 0.811 ms 0.405 ms 0.295 ms 2 stpl-dsl-gw13.stpl.qwest.net (207.109.2.13) 10.595 ms 10.860 ms 10.977 ms 3 stpl-agw1.inet.qwest.net (207.109.3.97) 57.309

Re: Suggestion: Replace Perl with Lua in the OpenBSD Base System

Maybe the OP could just go ahead and replace all the Perl code with Lua and then ask for feedback from the other devs? That is the OpenBSD way, right? If it really is a great idea, they’d all be really excited. In any case, it would kill this thread. EZ Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 31, 20

Re: Suggestion: Replace Perl with Lua in the OpenBSD Base System

Proposing such a huge project without the ability to do it? I may have been a little disrespectful, but not the first one in the thread. And my point wasn’t to be disrespectful, but to point out that most proposals unaccompanied by code and that don’t solve obvious problems don’t seem to be re

Suricata from packages

OpenBSD 6.6 Generic.MP amd64 Stable. I installed suricata using pkg_add. Having trouble with starting it. $ doas rcctl start suricata …fails. No informative fail message, though. I’ve tried finding info in logs. Nothing informative in suricata logs nor /var/log/messages. $ doas /usr/local/b

Re: Suricata from packages

> On Jan 18, 2020, at 6:42 AM, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 11:24:22PM -0600, Eric Zylstra wrote: >> OpenBSD 6.6 Generic.MP amd64 >> Stable. >> >> I installed suricata using pkg_add. Having trouble with starting it. >> >&g

Re: Suricata from packages

> On Jan 18, 2020, at 9:08 AM, Eric Zylstra wrote: > > > >> On Jan 18, 2020, at 6:42 AM, Antoine Jacoutot > <mailto:ajacou...@bsdfrog.org>> wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 11:24:22PM -0600, Eric Zylstra wrote: >>> OpenBSD 6.6 Generic

Re: Suricata from packages

The pkg-readme was perfect. Concise and all I need to know. Two minutes and I’m good to go. Thanks all! EZ Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 21, 2020, at 3:59 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2020/01/21 15:40, Eric Zylstra wrote: >> >> >>>> On Jan 21, 2

Re: Suricata from packages

> On Jan 21, 2020, at 1:45 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2020-01-18, Eric Zylstra wrote: >> >> >>> On Jan 18, 2020, at 6:42 AM, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 11:24:22PM -0600, Eric Zylstra wrote: >>>

Kibana/Elasticsearch fail

I’ve installed the ELK packages (Elasticsearch, Logstash, Kibana) using pkg_add. Installs went fine. I checked out the pkg documentation (pkg_reames) and followed the steps for those that had documentation to follow. When I boot, Logstash and Kibana fail. I can use rcctl to start Logstash wit

Re: Kibana/Elasticsearch fail

You rock! I’ll let you know it works for me when I get a chance. EZ Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 10, 2020, at 11:19 PM, Aaron Bieber wrote: > > On Thu, 06 Feb 2020 at 23:31:01 -0600, Eric Zylstra wrote: >> I’ve installed the ELK packages (Elasticsearch, Logstash, Kibana) us

File this bug, or not?

Misc, I’ve set up a 6 drive RAID-5. Just for the experience of degrading and rebuilding the RAID, I popped a drive out. Within a few seconds the machine kerneled and dropped into ddb. Is there any chance this would be expected considering the machine’s SATA is not hot-swappable? I’m looking

Re: File this bug, or not?

So you would expect a kernel panic when a live drive gets pulled from a RAID5? Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 20, 2021, at 7:12 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2021-01-19, Jordan Geoghegan wrote: >> >>> On 1/18/21 2:47 PM, Eric Zylstra wrote: >>> I’ve set

pf on bridge interface not working

Re: pf on bridge interface not working

pf on bridge interface not working

This came through to me from the list with “no content”, so I’m trying again. —— My box has three interfaces, dc0 to manage, em0 and em1 for bridging external LAN to internal LAN. hostname.em0: up hostname.em1: up hostname.bridge0: add em0 add em1 up Bridge works, traffi

Re: OT: Hardware keyloggers embedded in new keyboards?

On Jun 20, 2005, at 9:11 AM, Marco Peereboom wrote: nazis Invalid invocation! It must be a genuine, spontaneous reference. Now you damn us to dozens more messages in this thread because we all are now aware of the risk. EZ ;-)