help on rewriting ftp-proxy rules for 4.7 up

2010-08-16 Thread Dimitar Vassilev
Hello all, running OpenBSD 4.8 snapshot of Aug 16th on Alix 1D box. Rewrote my old pf rules to the new grammar for nat and ftp . Connection to ftp servers work, however ls and dir commands fail with connect failed: Network is unreachable. connect failed: Network is unreachable. connect failed: Netw

Re: help on rewriting ftp-proxy rules for 4.7 up

2010-08-16 Thread Dimitar Vassilev
o n.html > Thanks, > J > > On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Dimitar Vassilev > wrote: >> >> Hello all, >> running OpenBSD 4.8 snapshot of Aug 16th on Alix 1D box. >> Rewrote my old pf rules to the new grammar for nat and ftp . >> Connection to ftp servers

Re: help on rewriting ftp-proxy rules for 4.7 up

2010-08-17 Thread Dimitar Vassilev
2010/8/17 Peter N. M. Hansteen : > Dimitar Vassilev writes: > >> $tg_in on $ext_if inet proto udp from any to any port=syslog >> $tg_in on $ext_if from any to any flags P/FSRPAUEW >> $tg_in on $ext_if from any to any flags FPU/FSRPAUEW >> $tg_in on $ext_if from any

Intel(R) PRO/1000 GT+ VLANs + jumbo frames

2010-09-22 Thread Dimitar Vassilev
Hi misc, Could someone advise if running vlans+ jumbo frames is safe on IntelB. PRO/1000 GT? Man page says that there are known performance issues when running udp traffic What sort of performance issues one can face when running udp traffic on them and how much traffic is needed to cause this race

help on maximum performance from alix 1d

2010-10-09 Thread Dimitar Vassilev
Hi guys, I got the following setup bridge2 gig switches---home lab Inet---alix 1d box with quad gigabit---< DHCP usr lan The alix box is alix 1d with 256mb RAM # dmesg | more OpenBSD 4.

help on maximum performance from alix 1d

2010-10-09 Thread Dimitar Vassilev
Hi guys, I got the following setup bridge2 gig switches---home lab Inet---alix 1d box with quad gigabit---< DHCP usr lan The alix box is alix 1d with 256mb RAM and from home lab 2 home l

Re: help on maximum performance from alix 1d

2010-10-11 Thread Dimitar Vassilev
2010/10/11 Stuart Henderson : > Someone else replied offlist which I thought was worth responding > to here, > >>On 2010-10-10, Stuart Henderson wrote: [snip] >>> The CPU and chipset are way too slow to handle wire-speed gigabit. >>> You'll be better off with an Atom, VIA, or probably even a 350MH