On Wed, 16 Jul 2008, L. V. Lammert wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jul 2008, Marc Espie wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 09:30:02AM -0500, L. V. Lammert wrote:
> > > If a command line tool like git has a 'GUI Helper', then that package is
> > > broken (which, I believe, is the case in this situation).
>
On Sun, 20 Jul 2008, Uwe Dippel wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 12:47:40 -0500, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
>
> > I've an OpenBSD box that's been running postfix for a few
> > years, strictly as a "send-only" mta, and every night the
> > box gets rebooted. Every couple of months postfix does
> > not come u
On Sun, 20 Jul 2008, Aaron Stellman wrote:
> Now, on boot, the softraid0 doesn't attach itself to sd0n, perhaps not
> implemented yet? I was wondering if there were any plans to create
> support for crypto devices so that they could be mounted on boot as
> specified in fstab(5).
Yes, but someone
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008, Joel Dinel wrote:
> > To answer my own question, no sooner had I hit 'send' than I noticed the
> > patch number indicated 4.3. I have downloaded OpenSSH 5.0, the
> > appropriate 4.1 -> 5.0 patch and all is well.
>
> Well I am getting the exact same compilation error as you,
.patch) = d45b51c446f08e2f1356ef77c4d004814d27c572
Sorry for the confusion.
-d
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008, Renaud Allard wrote:
> Damien Miller wrote:
> > On Tue, 22 Jul 2008, Joel Dinel wrote:
> >
> > > > To answer my own question, no sooner had I hit 'send' th
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008, Joel Dinel wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Damien Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have just updated the patch, please try again once it has hit the
> > ftp server:
> >
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 djm djm 6411 Jul 23 23:31 openbsd4
On Sat, 26 Jul 2008, Frank Denis wrote:
> Le Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 05:54:28PM -0600, Daniel Melameth ecrivait :
> > Can't reproduce on a 4.2 -stable box with fxp NICs:
>
> Hello Daniel,
>
> Try to with net.inet.tcp.ecn=1
This is ECN blackhole detection at work, making a 2nd ECN-less connecti
On Sat, 26 Jul 2008, J Duke wrote:
> I realize that the whole fix to this DNS cache poisoning is to have
> random ports and random query ids, and that generating good, strong,
> random numbers costs cpu cycles and time. Has anyone else noticed the
> performance hit? Anything that I can do? Particu
On Fri, 1 Aug 2008, Anathae Townsend wrote:
> Besides the ASUS EEEPCs, has anyone tried to get other sub-notebooks working
> under OpenBSD?
http://openbsd.org/zaurus.html
-d
On Sat, 2 Aug 2008, Pau wrote:
> PS: Still, a BSD-licensed programme like R or gnuplot seems not to
> exist, right?
It isn't exactly a plotting "program", but ports/graphics/py-matplotlib
is BSD licensed and has a matlab-like interface.
Then again I don't consider gnuplot's license to be particu
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006, Paul Stoeber wrote:
> I wonder if the following language would provide the same level of
> protection or better:
>
> We, the authors of this work, are giving it away to you, dear
> reader (and to everyone else), as an opportunity, not as a
> service. Do with it w
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006, Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
> You mean to say that newer versions of OpenSSL do not allow you to
> create DSA keys longer than 1024 bits, but then isn't there an export
> and a non export version?
No, longer DSA keys do not offer extra cryptographic strength unless
you make o
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
> I am Searching the Internet for a Basic Hello World Ajax sample
> written in C if anyone has one laying around please reply to this post
I think you would be nuts to write your web applications in C, unless
you are a master with a good reason.
-d
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, Miod Vallat wrote:
> > Santa doesn't exist, you know?
>
> That's what people told me, but since he used to spam my mailbox, he
> must exist somehow.
Yes, and we know that he suffers from erectile dysfunction...
-d
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
> I am looking for some feedback on this DMESG if possible.
>
> I am playing with an old Sun T1 105 and does look like it work well, but I
> never saw so many not configure message in a single DMESG.
This is normal and harmless - openfirmware identifies
On Thu, 23 Nov 2006, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> From time to time, people come here to ask:
> How can i set up an account for SFTP only, forbidding shell access?
>
> One common answer is scponly, http://sublimation.org/scponly/wiki/
> This looks quite powerful, in particular if you intend to chroot.
Dries Schellekens wrote:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-cvs&m=111690466011478&w=2
How does this compare to NetBSD agr(4)? Is this also IEEE 802.3AD?
It does some things that agr does not, but doesn't do 802.3ad yet.
Probably soon though.
-d
Marc Peters wrote:
does anyone on this list has experience with powerdns? iirc it can use
several databases as backend and is released under the GPL2.
If you want a good, authoritative-only DNS server then you might want to
try ports/net/nsd
-d
Joseph Kiniry wrote:
Hi,
On 2 Jun 2005, at 16:20, Ed White wrote:
http://code.google.com/summerofcode.html
Where is OpenBSD ?
Google only gave "external" projects one day to hear about this event
and submit mentoring proposals. :\
... and it isn't even summer here.
steven n fettig wrote:
Dunno' what I'm doing wrong. I have 3.7 installed on a ThinkPad x40
that has:
ath0 at pci1 dev 2 function 0 "Atheros AR5212" rev 0x01: irq 11
ath0: mac 80.9 phy 4.3 radio 4.6, 802.11a/b/g, WOR4W, address
00:0e:9b:6f:4a:b0
Mine works fine with -current:
ath0 at pci1
Matt Garman wrote:
So, still, the question remains: what do folks recommend as "good"
hardware for hard disk controllers?
The LSI cards supported by the ami(4) driver are excellent. I recently
purchased a LSI MegaRAID SATA 150-4 and have been very impressed with
it.
-d
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
The goal: Only allow PDF upload to that directory with the ftp client
and also no possibility to rename the files to .php for example.
...
Allow, delete, replace, upload of *.pdf ONLY via ftpd for the reason above?
First, ftpd isn't responsible for sftp - you are afte
poncenby wrote:
Hello all
being a naturally lazy person i was wondering whether anyone knows of a
nice easy, step-by-step guide to modifying the dietlibc source so it
will compile on openbsd 3.7.
Why? OpenBSD's libc is pretty slim already. If you have need of a
further cut-down libc, you c
Jim Beard wrote:
Can anyone point me in the right direction to get flash working with
firefox? I notice there is a nsplugin.so in ports/graphics/flash.
Would this work for firefox or would it work with netscape?
Another alternative would be to port swfdec[1], which includes a
mozilla-style pl
Markus Wernig wrote:
3) At the time I installed the systems, openssl.org was at version 0.98.
OpenSSL 0.9.8 was released only two days ago. Because it is a
significant change, it probably won't be in OpenBSD before 3.9.
OpenBSD -current (to be 3.8) includes 0.9.7g.
I've cvs up'd and recompil
M. Schatzl wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi list,
is there a reason why the OpenBSD-shipped syslogd cannot write
directly into a pipe? This would come in quite handy for just-in-time
log-processing.
pipes can go away and block, what should syslogd do then? I would bet
t
Jason Burrell wrote:
Here's a new one. Okay, well, it probably isn't.
I have an old Pentium 133 that I want to use as an internal server to
serve files on encrypted filesystems, act as a database server, and
securely store mail. The idea is that if the machine reboots, I have to
ssh into it, ent
Alexander Farber wrote:
Hi,
I'm developing a small multiplayer card game on OpenBSD
(but also try to keep it at least compilable on Linux).
After 32 cards have been shuffled, each of 3 players gets
10 cards. At the moment I use the sum of time()s when any
data has been received from a playe
Rod.. Whitworth wrote:
Well my dmesg lines don't look like either set of yours BUT disabling
802.11a didn't fix it but disabling 802.11g as well leaves me with a
working 11b. After I paid for a brandname a/b/g, dammit!
One day there will be hardware makers across the range of product lines
that
Genadijus Paleckis wrote:
Theo de Raadt wrote:
Oh well -- we've decided that we will try to ship with this protection
mechanism in any case, and try to solve the problems as we run into
them.
Is that means that 3.8 might be unstable ? Maybe all who wants/needs
stable systems need to run 3.7
On Fri, 3 Mar 2006, Reid Nichol wrote:
> I find it interesting that you didn't send this entirely condisending
> superior reply to the list. Now why is that?
because it is off topic. Please stop this thread, which has nothing
to do with OpenBSD anymore.
Please,
This troll is several years old, let it go already.
-d
On Mon, 6 Mar 2006, Jon Hart wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 09:09:35PM +0100, RedShift wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ nslookup
> > > www.wideopenbsd.org
> > www.wideopenbsd.org A 129.128.5.191
> > > 129.128.5.191
> > N
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006, Lars Hansson wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Mar 2006 19:59:43 -0800
> smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Are there any plans for an OpenBSD implementation of sshfs?
> > Or has someone successfully installed fuse and sshfs on OpenBSD
> > (preferably 3.8)?
>
> IIRC, fuse is pretty ti
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006, Gustavo Rios wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> i have just installed 3.8 in my sun desktop. It installed ok, 100% perfect.
>
> Know, i would like to strip the kernel to the bare minimum
> ...
No, you don't know.
On Thu, 9 Mar 2006, Jean-Yves Boisiaud wrote:
> hello,
>
> in OBSD 3.8, union filesystem (mount_union(8)) has been removed.
>
> http://www.openbsd.org/plus38.html does not say nothing about that.
>
> Will union fs be back ?
Not in its previous form, and so far no one has expressed an interest
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, Paul Greene wrote:
> Just another idea. Start making the mega-companies like IBM, RedHat,
> etc pay a license fee for the use of OpenSSH. They save literally
> millions of dollars incorporating this into their own products, and
> don't give anything back to the project.
No, w
On Fri, 24 Mar 2006, chefren wrote:
> Demand something like $50 a year for access to the ftp.openbsd.org now!!!
You are suggesting that we screw the people who have contributed by far
the most to OpenBSD and OpenSSH, individual users and small organisations.
Not a very bright idea.
-d
On Fri, 24 Mar 2006, Andris Delfino wrote:
> Please, stop wanting companies to support you. It doesn't work that
> way. To develop an OS under a licence like the ISC has a big hole:
> funding. You can't just go: Hey, you use the implementation that I
> develop and give away for free, you should pa
On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Karl Kopp wrote:
> crypto isakmp policy 10
> encr 3des
> hash md5
> authentication pre-share
> group 2
Last time I tried, I had to specify an explicit lifetime for the
phase 1 policy here.
> run isakmpd -K -d, then ipsecctl -f /etc/ipsec.conf and get:
>
> 170525.073348 D
On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Karl Kopp wrote:
> Hi Damien,
>
> Firstly, do you think I will be able to do this with the
> /etc/ipsec.conf setup, or will I have to go thru all the
> /etc/isakmpd/* stuff?
I haven't yet used ipsecctl to set up a VPN, but in theory it
shouldn't matter which way you go.
> >
so? we don't need more symmetric ciphers...
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, Alexey E. Suslikov wrote:
> Camellia was certified as the IETF standard cipher (Proposed
> Standard) for SSL/TLS cipher suites (RFC4132) and IPsec (RFC4312).
>
> Source:
> https://info.isl.ntt.co.jp/crypt/eng/camellia/source_s.htm
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is it maybe planed to add any joker to PF so that such stuff would be
> possible in the future if it isn`t already possible?
think about why this is undesirable and practically impossible for
five minutes. (hint: you are confusing DNS names and net
On Fri, 28 Apr 2006, Brian wrote:
> I am in the process of making syslogd more protocol independent (IPv4
> & IPv6). I am just about ready to add a priviledged fuction for
> getnameinfo, but what I do not understand is why the the DNS lookups
> are priviledged separated. I do understand the securi
On Sun, 30 Apr 2006, Marco Castronovo wrote:
> > Linksys answering:
> > "I apologize but we are not allowed to disclose any information
> > regarding the
> > chipsets of any of our devices. Besides, we do not have any access with
> > those
> > information. Again, we apologize for any inconvenien
On Mon, 1 May 2006, Dave Feustel wrote:
> After looking at the slides for Loic Duffet's presentation
> http://72.14.203.104/search?q=cache:y-G4z3W2zuQJ:www.cansecwest.com/slides06/csw06-duflot.ppt+%27Lo%C3%AFc+Duflot%27&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=1&ie=UTF-8
> on x86 hardware vulnerabilities at CanSecW
On Tue, 2 May 2006, josh wrote:
> Hello...
>
> Some people seem to think that installing a compiler inherently makes
> their system less secure... despite never being able to cite any
> actual reasons why.
>
> Personally, I really dont see how a compiler is going to lessen
> security, particuarly
On Mon, 1 May 2006, Brian wrote:
> I am reading through the tree(3), and I need some clarification. If I
> want to correctly remove an element from a red black tree that I have
> found and free it's memory allocation, this code should work, right?
>
> find.i = 400;
> n = RB_FIND(inttree, &head, &f
On Tue, 2 May 2006, paul dansing wrote:
> Is there some reason this issue is being ignored? What, you people
> need to see an exploit before you will even LOOK at it and answer
> whether it is vuln?
It isn't our job to tell you what software is vulnerable. But maybe
you should read your own emai
On Thu, 4 May 2006, Eric Ziegast wrote:
> An 3l33t hacker might figure out that all he/she had to do was
> modify the magic number to get their program to run, but most people
> (including script kiddies) wouldn't figure it out, give up, and move
> on to softer targets.
Typical security-through-o
On Fri, 5 May 2006, Brett Lymn wrote:
> Otto is correct about exploiting a buffer overflow to run code
> (certainly veriexec won't stop that trick) but I do wonder if it would
> be possible to enforce a restriction that any executable page must be
> backed by an on-disk object and how much pain/lo
This has nothing to do with OpenBSD. Please take your childish language
flamewars to private email.
On Wed, 24 May 2006, Jonathan Weiss wrote:
> Cheers,
>
> Adam wrote:
> > On Wed, 24 May 2006 02:08:45 +0200 Jonathan Weiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > So Ruby is slower than Python for y
w.sensors" and see if
the numbers change when you tilt the laptop. Next, suspend and resume
and see if they still respond to tilting.
Thanks,
Damien Miller
On Thu, 8 Sep 2005, Gustavo Rios wrote:
By using BSD license, would i be able to confidently consider my tools
to be included wihtin OBSD?
this is a necessary but by no means sufficient quality.
On Thu, 8 Sep 2005, Jeff Ross wrote:
This morning httpd was failing to deliver files because of a "too many open
files" error. I'd previously bumped kern.maxfiles from the default 1772 to
2048 and kern.maxvnodes from its default 1310 to 2048, so this morning I
doubled them both to 4096.
You p
On Thu, 8 Sep 2005, Gustavo Rios wrote:
Ok, i see! What, then, should i address more?
There is no guarantee that 3rd party code will be included in OpenBSD.
Frankly, the odds are against importing random software into base unless
it is quite wonderful, but getting software in to ports is som
Lukasz Sztachanski wrote:
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 10:11:51PM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
Hi...
Some months ago, a patch to import nsswitch into OpenBSD was post on tech@ :
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-tech&m=110098242313143&w=2
I was wondering if there was any ongoing work on n
Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
And what about hesiod ? Was it ever considered to be included ?
As in unauthenticated distribution of private account data via DNS?
I strongly doubt it.
-d
On Mon, 12 Sep 2005, Rod.. Whitworth wrote:
Any clues/ things to try? I am a bit worried about the build #137 as
that's pretty close to release but I haven't heard anybody else
reporting problems and the archives don't show any relevant posts.
Can you plug a serial console onto the systems to
On Mon, 12 Sep 2005, Theo de Raadt wrote:
Because it is boring and largely irrelevant.
We don't write errata up for every stupid retarded little thing that
noone uses and which really is causing NOONE ANY GRIEF AT ALL.
In this case, the two "vulnerabilities" do not expose the server at all -
On Mon, 12 Sep 2005, Juan J.Martmnez wrote:
> I know other projects have ChangeLog files and other ways to track
> versions. In fact I don't know if there's a changelog around for
> OpenSSH, I usually check the announce and I evaluate if it's worth
> updating or not.
Yes, the announcement message
Arthur Bebak wrote:
I'm trying to run famd (the port of the file monitoring
utility from SGI) on OpenBSD 3.7. In order to do this it
appears I need a bunch of functions such as getmntent, which
apparently are in the GNU libc.
Doing some Google searches I find references to a linux_base port
w
Andreas Kahari wrote:
(the WINCH signal is delivered when the terminal window changes size)
SIGWINCH is ignored by default, otherwise your sleep(1) would exit if
you changed the size of your xterm. See signal(3) for the full list.
So it is doing the right thing wrt your quote of SUSv3:
The S
On Sun, 9 Oct 2005, Gustavo Rios wrote:
Does OBSD support something like Solaris DTrace?
no
On Sun, 16 Oct 2005, Antti Harri wrote:
Hi,
I have two USB printers, is there a way to assign
a fixed device name instead of device name being
assigned dynamically? If it's not possible at all,
are there plans to implement it?
You could try making symlinks using hotplugd(8) attach and detach
frantisek holop wrote:
so before anyone tags this mail as a trolling flamebait
(which it is not), i just would like to ask
-have others tried HPN-SSH?
-have ssh developers tried it?
-or simply, has ssh hit its performance limit and can't get any better?
the "HPN" patch greatly improves through
Sebastian Rother wrote:
I've a question because ssh-agent.
Why do I've to start an ssh-agent for each Console even sudo works for all
consoles if I entered the password once?
Maybe I missed something in the configuration but I don#t think so.
As usual, you missed reading the manpage.
If not
On Thu, 3 Nov 2005, Gustavo Rios wrote:
Dear gentleman,
i have an obsd firewall and would like to prevent external entities
discovering that firewall is openbsd, is that possible?
why care? fingerprinting is such a non-issue, and spending effort to avoid
it is just security through obscurity
On Sun, 6 Nov 2005 00:40:12 -0200
Gustavo Rios <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> sorry, but i found this on the web. May someone tell if it is serious,
> i myself could not believe it.
>
> http://www.informit.com/articles/article.asp?p=424451&seqNum=1
Just another troll for 10+ pages
On Tue, 8 Nov 2005, Ioan Nemes wrote:
It in not the question of sshd works or, not! In large environments,
where you have a large number of legacy hardware (like Apollo 700,
HP 3000, HP 7000, Solaris 2.5.1 etc., etc.),
You can compile portable OpenSSH (or another ssh client) on most of these.
man dd
On Tue, 8 Nov 2005, Marcos Marconcini wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to extract a portion of a large file, to do a sha1 check, it's
greater than 2.7Gb. I was reading help for head command, but it's only
permit me put number of lines to extract, and I need to extract the portion
of 1.5Gb in by
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 16:44:46 -0500
stan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I;ve got a machien that seems to getting atacked by what appears to be a
> simplistic "brute force" attck. it's getting hit multiple ties a second
> with bogus root login attempts, my guess is that they are trying dictionary
> at
On Sat, 12 Nov 2005 20:15:18 -0600
"J.D. Bronson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am starting to see TONS of these things in my pflog
>
> Nov 12 19:50:58.030904 rule 48/(match) block in on tun0:
> 63.219.179.130.13519 > 65.x.x.169.53: 47505+[|domain]
>
> Nov 12 19:51:08.037007 rule 48/(match) b
On Sat, 12 Nov 2005 21:54:42 -0600
J Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The readme file in flashboot contains an overview of building the
> ram-disk kernel. What it doesn't explain is how to install the kernel on
> the CF, or prepare the CF for booting the kernel.
There are some extra instructi
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 23:16:26 -0800
tuco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The IP-less, OpenBSD copper to radio bridge I put together lets my only
> wireless client, a PowerBook G4, get an IP issued to it from a bridged
> wired network but friends wireless Windows clients cannot.
If they are using a r
On Tue, 15 Nov 2005, J Moore wrote:
Nov 15 04:13:30 opie dhcpd: DHCPREQUEST for 192.168.1.207 from
00:e0:4c:cf:15:90 via sis1
Now that one doesn't fit on a single line, does it? How would you
propose exactly to make that entry both clear and < 80 chars?
This message is long because it conveys
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005, Andreas Bartelt wrote:
As much better algorithms for error detection are known and PC performance
(and also Internet traffic) has increased a lot since the introduction of TCP
- do you think that the original checksum algorithm is still the best choice
in terms of a reliab
On Sat, 19 Nov 2005, poncenby smythe wrote:
Dear list,
Does anyone why the versions of tcpdump and libpcap in 3.8 GENERIC (3.2(i
think) and 0.5 respectively) are quite a way off from the current stable
releases (0.9.4).
Exactly what do you want from the tcpdump.org version?
-d
On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 08:40:59 +
poncenby smythe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 20 Nov 2005, at 23:16, Damien Miller wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 19 Nov 2005, poncenby smythe wrote:
> >
> >> Dear list,
> >>
> >> Does anyone why the versions of
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005, Tan Dang wrote:
I have had this problem of files not showing up on the fat partition
after moving the files over from ffs also. I dual boot OpenBSD 3.8
and Windows XP on my laptop. Both os's share a fat partition. For my
particular case, I put Windows XP into hibernation
Matthew Closson wrote:
> Where is the code for the ip_forward() function in 3.8?
>
> I found the prototype in: /usr/src/sys/netinet/ip_var.h
>
> void ip_forward(struct *mbuf, int);
>
> but no function definition.
>
> I also did a grep -sR "ip_forward" /usr/src
> and all I found was the functio
Dave Feustel wrote:
> The problem with /tmp/.X11-unix/X0 addressed by the
> 2003 paper on XFree86 still exists today with Xorg.
What problem? X11 implements its own authentication.
-d
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005, Travers Buda wrote:
> The key schedule in both is _much_ faster than Blowfish.
That is not a feature, at least not in the contexts where we use blowfish
most.
> The password file and
> others would require the use of salts in order to resist dictionary attacks,
> especially
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I installed oBSD current for AMD64 on 1.1.2006, created a encrypted
> partition for /home and ran into some trouble.
>
> The permissions for /home or /tmp didn't changed:
> drwxr-xr-x 6 root wheel 512 Jan 2 07:59 tmp
> drwxr-xr-x 2 root
Dave Feustel wrote:
> Check the ownership/privileges on /tmp/.X11-unix/X0 after you start kde or
> Xorg.
You can stop repeating this now, you have already demonstrated your
ignorance.
Travers Buda wrote:
> Ted Unangst,
>
> Yes, I've looked at the archives.
>
> You've made it very clear that CGD won't be imported into OpenBSD, yet
> you've never explained why, or why you ported it in the first place.
>
> Care to let us in on why? I expect your reply will be a short "no" just
Travers Buda wrote:
> On Friday 06 January 2006 14:46, Ted Unangst wrote:
>
>>i had an afternoon free and nothing better to do. i probably stored
>>about 10k of data on a cgd partition for about 5 minutes to see if it
>>worked, then deleted it. the stats with encrypted svnd are pretty
>>similar,
Gustavo Rios wrote:
> Dear fellows,
>
> i am in need to write event driven processing applications. I must
> avoid sequential processing. I will be mixing RPC queries and dns
> ones.
>
> I saw, at the first sigh, writing non batch program is very hard to
> accomplish. So i wonder how openbsd mana
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Diana Eichert wrote:
> I've been following all the i2c work lately and have a question. I have
> some blade servers that use i2c as a control path between a master blade
> and the child blades. This is in addition to sensor info.
>
> Has there been any thought towards suppo
ober wrote:
> http://www.linbsd.org/wafter.c
> Updates to include icmp, and udp support as well
> as a code cleanup.
> Works on i386.
> Feel free to provide any feedback.
You could do pretty much everything that this module provides using a
small bpf(4) program with the BIOCSFILDROP ioctl set, wit
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006, Ricardo Lucas wrote:
> Hello misc,
> anyone knows a program that monitoring the cpu temperature and hard disk
> temperature and rotation?!
There has been a lot of hardware monitoring work that has been happening
in -current recently. Grab a snapshot and try it out - the resul
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006, Ricardo Lucas wrote:
> Any ideias?
we can't help you without a dmesg.
-d
Didier Wiroth wrote:
> Hello,
> (I'm a compile novice)
Then you shouldn't be cross-compiling. In fact, cross-compiling isn't
supported on OpenBSD for end-users at all. Check the archive to see
reams of discussion on this.
If you want your fast amd64 machine to make i386 snapshots, then
consider m
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
> Upon booting I also get quite a bit of hex-dump output right after the
> iic line. I'm not sure if that is related and an indication that
> something on the iic bus is not getting configured. (dmesg appended)
This is the i2c sensor probe findi
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Travers Buda wrote:
> I'm suggesting it as the default behavior. Ya' know, secure by default.
by default we don't turn rtsold on.
If you want this now (i.e. while you are working on a full
implementation for us), then you can manually set a different
(randomly generated) lla
Lucas Reddinger wrote:
> so the question is: is wi(4) secure at all? if i choose to run openbsd
> for a point-to-point wifi connection, i choose a specific nwid and
> channel. but since i cannot select bssid nor even chan, the two nodes
> just connect to the best looking signal under the given nwid
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006, Lucas Reddinger wrote:
> On 1/28/06, Damien Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > use ipsec if you care about the traffic that does over such a link
>
> ipsec protects the traffic, but it doesn't mean that the link won't
> drop. i
(trimming absurdly long Cc list)
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006, Brian A. Seklecki wrote:
> I will say this, though. It takes about 35 seconds to do an "ipmitool sdr
> list full". Thus, for every two values you would like to graph in MRTG,
> you can add 35 seconds to the job's run time. The time it takes
On Sat, 4 Feb 2006, Andris Delfino wrote:
> I need to run a benchmark for testing the temperature of my system,
> which of these
(http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/ports/benchmarks/?only_with_tag=OPENBS
D_3_8)
> do you recommend?
If you just want to make your CPU hot, then running "openssl sp
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Jonas Davidsson wrote:
> syslog.conf:
> # Keep a copy of all logging in a 32k memory buffer named "debug"
> *.debug :32:debug
>
> #>pkill syslogd; syslogd -s /var/run/syslogd.sock
This is wrong. Look at the options th
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Peter wrote:
> $ ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/local/sbin/command
>
> The PATH of the user (given in ~/.profile) contains /usr/local/sbin but
> evidently this file remains unread.
.profile is only used for interactive sessions. Try .kshrc
101 - 200 of 232 matches
Mail list logo
