Do OpenBSD developers approve Isotop?
If not, why OpenBSD developers don't approve Isotop?
Reference Isotop: https://3hg.fr/Isos/isotop/
Hi!
Just as most programmers today warn people not to use assembler, probably
future programmers will warn people not to use high-level programming
languages.
It is written in book Java How to Program ninth edition that instead of
using the strings of numbers that computers could directly underst
Will Theo de Raadt and other OpenBSD developer answer this topic (
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=157234932505571&w=2)?
In 2019 still there is not a great desktop experience for NetBSD. However,
the new "OS108" is seeking to improve this with a NetBSD operating system
paired with the MATE desktop environment.
So, OS108, a derivative of NetBSD, has just been released:
https://os108.org/?ez_cid=CLIENT_ID(AMP_ECID_EZOI
Great desktop experience for OpenBSD is a user-friendly and easy-to-use
variant of OpenBSD!
Was developed the Isotop:
https://www.reddit.com/r/BSD/comments/8of042/isotop_french_desktoporiented_openbsd_distro/
https://3hg.fr/Isos/isotop/
The Isotop is really a user-friendly and easy-to-use
variant of OpenBSD or is foolish?
I received the following private messages about a user-friendly and
easy-to-use variant of OpenBSD:
Clark,
great e-mail!
As you have noticed, the OpenBSD devs and even advocates tend to be quite
hostile towards ideas and viewpoints that don't fit their world.
I have had similar thoughts and re
7 matches
Mail list logo
