I'm in a good position to test Softraid on an AMD and an UltraSPARC,
however I've realized I don't know a lot about it (what -exactly- it's
working to accomplish, and commands to use).
Is there an overview of Softraid to get me started so I can be of some use?
Chris
umentation isn't good enough. Can you point me
to the area that isn't clear?
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 11:29:20AM -0700, Chris Cameron wrote:
I'm in a good position to test Softraid on an AMD and an UltraSPARC,
however I've realized I don't know a lot about it (what -exactly
I made a mistake and bought a couple Dell servers with Intel "VT" NICs.
These aren't recognized by 4.2, and the January 15th Snapshot seems to
recognize them, but they're marked as "not configured".
So, in the most humble way I possibly can, (without any hint of "demand"
I hope) can someone te
I'm trying to setup a Soekris that I can hand to someone and have it
work just like a Linksys might.
My one snag is grabbing a DHCP address from a server that may always not
be there. For instance if they plug the device in, but then don't plug
in the network cable until several minutes later.
Have a Soekris with and Atheros AR5212. Wirelessly, out to the internet
packets get dropped. Wired, out to the internet, no problem. This is
with the same laptop using the same outbound internet connection.
Wirelessly, from this laptop to the router no packets are dropped. From
the router to s
I'm getting the following:
pf_src_connlimit: blocking address xx.xx.xx.xx, 7 states killed
Which is a pretty neat feature except I can't find anything on it, and
it's (somewhat) silently doing this.
Can someone point me to where I can read about this? I'd like to know
how it decides to bloc
Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2007/05/01 09:04, Chris Cameron wrote:
pf_src_connlimit: blocking address xx.xx.xx.xx, 7 states killed
Can someone point me to where I can read about this? I'd like to know
how it decides to block the IP, how I can change it and at what point
this block time
Have two 3.8 firewalls in a CARP setup, and through this firewall I'm
unable to get to ticketmaster.ca or .com. They both have different IPs.
On the master CARP firewall, with tcpdump on the external interface:
Sorry, hit Ctrl+Enter.
192.168.0.1 - CARP IP
192.168.0.2 - Master firewall IP
On the master CARP firewall, with tcpdump on the external interface:
Connecting behind firewall:
08:18:30.705631 192.168.0.1.53119 > 209.104.48.144.80: S
4111080674:4111080674(0) win 16384 (DF) [tos 0x10]
08:18:30.
On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 10:46 -0400, Asenchi wrote:
> On 9/7/06, Chris Cameron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Have two 3.8 firewalls in a CARP setup, and through this firewall I'm
> > unable to get to ticketmaster.ca or .com. They both have different IPs.
> Bu
For our Windows/Solaris/Linux servers, we've had PWC say that they're
qualified and able to do post-intrusion forensics on our server(s).
I'm told this will go a long way in making everyone in our company as
well as our customers feel better. Partly because it's an outside
party verification of wha
Do you plan to need a trailer full of Sun hardware?
They're just normal Sun machines in a trailer.
On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 14:55 -0300, Gustavo Rios wrote:
> Dear list members,
>
> While visiting sun blackbox home page, i saw they have a new project
> called blackbox. But i don't know whether op
On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 15:59 +, Tobias Weingartner wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Chris Cameron wrote:
> >
> > I have a 3.8 PF/CARP setup that I can reproducibly screw up simply by
> > cat'ing lots of text over a telnet session.
>
> Chances a
I have a 3.8 PF/CARP setup that I can reproducibly screw up simply by
cat'ing lots of text over a telnet session.
It has several subnets, and several NICs, but only 1 subnet becomes
unavailable. Everything else continues to work. There are no errors in
messages, daemon, with PF debug set to misc.
$ sudo pfctl -s memory
stateshard limit1
src-nodes hard limit1
frags hard limit 5000
tableshard limit 1000
table-entries hard limit 10
$
Chris
On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 13:05 -0500, Carlos A. Carnero Delgado wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 11/14/0
Just building off my last message. Answering Ryans questions first:
- Do you have dedicated addresses on the carp parent interfaces?
For sure.
- Are all the carp devices on the master firewall MASTER; what about the
backup?
Before and after the network dies, primary firewall is all MASTER,
se
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/~checkout~/www/faq/faq13.html?rev=1.79&content-type=text/html
Keep in mind it was removed for a reason (I used it successfully though).
Bruce Marriner wrote:
I am trying to setup an OpenBSD <> OpenBSD VPN Tunnel to connect two
remote offices togeth
Have an OpenBSD firewall working in an office doing very straight
forward NAT and some persistent VPN tunnels.
Couple weeks ago, this firewall just stopped responding to any traffic.
It was sporadic, as after several minutes it'd start going again. At
that point it was a patched Sparc64 3.5.
In my pf.conf I have:
set skip on tun0
set skip on enc0
set skip on lo0
tun0 is for OpenVPN. If I run pfctl -f /etc/pf.conf, I can connect with
OpenVPN and telnet to a server.
If I disconnect OpenVPN, wait for a couple of minutes, then try
connecting with telnet again, pf blocks the connection.
On Mon, 2006-05-01 at 13:02 -0400, Chris Bullock wrote:
> Can queues be used to queue overall bandwidth? We have a project where we
> will be sharing an Internet connection with another company, we will have an
> IP and they will have an IP each company providing their own firewall. I
> understan
Has anyone recently compiled BandwidthD on OpenBSD?
I've been banging my head against this for a while, and it's just one
thing after another not working.
This is on 3.8/Sparc64, but would be willing to hear from anyone who has
done this before.
Chris
I have 3 subnets, 192.168.120.x, 121.x and 122.x. 120 and 121 are
physically connected, 122 connects through a VPN.
In my VPN config, in Phase 2 I have:
Local-ID= 120network
Remote-ID= 122network
As expected, the 120 and 122 networks talk fine, traffic coming from or
I'm trying to do something I'm pretty sure I recall reading couldn't be
done. Although I wasn't able to find any information this last time around.
We're going to be temporarily splitting our data centre, but still want
both data centre halfs connected to our office through our VPN. Everyone
n
When one interface fails in a carp setup, it is my understanding that if
net.inet.carp.preempt is set to '1', that both interfaces on the single
machine should fail. However I'm not seeing this happening and I'm
hoping this is why I'm dropping connections during fail over. If I fail
both interf
Running 3.8.
Chris
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Chris Cameron wrote:
When one interface fails in a carp setup, it is my understanding that
if net.inet.carp.preempt is set to '1', that both interfaces on the
single machine should fail. However I'm not seeing this happening and
I&#
What is it OpenBSD does to prevent breaks/Stop+A from working?
Did a net install of 3.8 on a V100 and was playing with RAIDFrame.
Trying to get it to boot off the second disk, it refuses to go to an ok
prompt.
If I unplug both drives, set bootmode to reset_nvram in LOM and boot the
machine I
Bryan Irvine wrote:
If I unplug both drives, set bootmode to reset_nvram in LOM and boot the
machine I can use break to get to an ok prompt. However if I plug the
drives back in, the instant the OpenBSD boot loader comes up, I again
can't get back to an ok prompt. This is while
Have/had a V100 working as an office firewall. It maintains a VPN
connection between itself and another OBSD firewall. All running OBSD
3.8. Both are quite new in their current positions. Previous to this an
Ultra2 with 3.5 was doing this job without issue.
The V100 twice now has hung without
I do this with -very- different computers all the time. As long as
you're keeping GENERIC as your kernel, it should be fine.
Chris
On Thursday 05 May 2005 12:15, you wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have a co-located 3.4 web/mail box at a remote location with a P3
> 1.2Ghz and
> 1Gb RAM (on-board LAN an
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 9:32 PM, VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO wrote:
>
> Most people that have those big amounts of memory don't use their
> PCs full potential. CPU is mostly idle, etc. Also they don't
> realize how big those amounts of memory are...
>
> Also there is the environment problem, too many
30 matches
Mail list logo
