Hi List,
I'm absolutely new to openbsd so please bear with me if it's not
the right place to ask my question. The box I installed 4.5 will
be running headless so I'm logged in remotely on a color xterm.
I rsynced mutt configuration from my Ubuntu box because it's also
running mutt 1.5.18, most
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 07:21 -0400, Luis Useche wrote:
> I don't know if this solve your problem or you already did this, but
> you need to set the xterm in order to have colors for manuals or vim.
> Read from FAQ "How do I get color man pages on XTerm?".
Not reading the FAQ but trying after your
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 14:40 +0200, Joachim Schipper wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 09:43:24AM +0200, Bernd 'Siggy' Brentrup wrote:
> I'm fairly certain xterm_* is a Debian/Ubuntu "improvement": at least,
> http://www.mutt.org/doc/devel/manual.html doesn
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 17:09 +, Daniel Bolgheroni wrote:
> Hi,
>
> since Nick Holland touched on the DESIGN aspect in his e-mail regarding
> supporting OpenBSD, I think this article pretty much reflects the
> reality here.
>
http://www.osnews.com/story/22135/The_Problem_with_Design_and_Implem
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 23:15 +0200, Bernd Siggy Brentrup wrote:
> [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type
application/pgp-signature which had a name of signature.asc]
Oops, in general I gpg-sign my mails with a detached signature but if
it's this list's policy not to do so
Sorry Brian to sort of hijack this new thread; until late last night
I had no time to follow the original one and you don't attribute
your opponent.
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 12:27 -0400, Brian Shackelford wrote:
> > > Correction, a professional OS that requires its users to be
> > > professionals.
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 18:01 -0400, bofh wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 5:16 PM, neal hogan wrote:
> > I'd never say 'laf' before, so I did the usual and of course it is an
> > acronym for many, many things . . . in this case I think it stands for
> > 'LOL Anime Fanboys' -theFreeDictionary.com
On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 12:55 -0700, Austin Hook wrote:
> According to the man pages for "at" (or batch):
>
> The working directory, the environment (except for the variables
> TERM, TERMCAP, DISPLAY, and _), and the umask are retained from the
> time of invocation.
>
> But, oddly en
Hi Ted,
better not wake up sleeping dogs :)
On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 17:14 -0400, you wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Bernd Siggy Brentrup
wrote:
> > AFAICT from at(1), the code is still mostly T-Rex's implementation.
> >
> > You may want to have a look at ht
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 01:30 +, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 02:48:59AM +0200, Bernd Siggy Brentrup wrote:
> > Hi Ted,
> >
> > better not wake up sleeping dogs :)
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 17:14 -0400, you wrote:
> > > O
On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 19:35 -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 17:14 -0400, you wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Bernd Siggy Brentrup
> > wrote:
> > > > AFAICT from at(1), the code is still mostly T-Rex's implementation.
On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 20:47 -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > The word goes Theo de Raadt himself is driving away ppl from using
> > openBSD by pissing them of publicly.
> I am more than happy to drive away people who come to our mailing
> list trying to sell their wares.
What exactly makes you
12 matches
Mail list logo
