i386 kernel panic with 1/9/09 snapshot

Hi This is the first problem I've had with OpenBSD, I think I've attached all relevant information but if i've neglected anything please let me know. I'm getting the following panic at boot time with the latest snapshot dated 1/9/09 uvm_fault(0xd08084a0, 0x12e3e000, 0, 3) -> e kernel: page fault t

ipsec help needed

Hello I'm trying to secure my wireless network using ipsec. I have the client and the router (both running a recent snapshot) communicating using esp fine as indicated by tcpdump when I ping the router from the client. However the problem I'd like to solve is when I access the internet the traffic

Re: ipsec help needed

Thanks a lot guys. Works perfectly! On 15/03/2008, Jochen Fabricius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > this setup works for me (replaced with your IPs): > > on client: > > ike esp from 192.168.1.200 to 0.0.0.0/0 peer 192.168.1.1 > > on router: > > ike esp from 0.0.0.0/0 to 192.168.1.200 > > Bo

Re: Samba(SMB) or Netatalk(AFP)?

Doesn't NFS mean restricting root access on each client in order to prevent people accessing other files? Is there a way (short of restricting root access) to prevent this?

Re: Samba(SMB) or Netatalk(AFP)?

You could still either su to the user whos files you want from root, or you could map their UID. Both would allow you access to other users files. On 19/03/2008, Almir Karic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 11:12 AM, Barry Commander > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g

Re: Samba(SMB) or Netatalk(AFP)?

I was under the impression kerberos support was only available with NFSv4 - looking at the manpages, it seems OpenBSD is using NFSv3 On 19/03/2008, Almir Karic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Barry Commander > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot

IPv6 LAN -> IPv4 Internet

Hi guys I've found it very easy to get all the machines on my LAN speaking IPv6 but would like them now to be able to access the internet using IPv6 until they reach my router, where it converts to IPv4 and relays the data to the internet, converting back to IPv6 on the return route. Is this possib

Re: IPv6 LAN -> IPv4 Internet

ervers Thanks Barry On 19/03/2008, Jonathan Schleifer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > "Barry Commander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Is this possible? Where would I find the information required to set > > this up? > > > It reads like you wa

Re: IPv6 LAN -> IPv4 Internet

Thanks Paul. Sorry for the confusion, I'd like to have only IPv6 traffic on my LAN and still be able to access IPv4 sites. I think i'll just stick to using sixx for now. Thanks again Barry On 19/03/2008, Paul de Weerd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 0

ports questions

Hi how can I list flavors for dependencies of a given port and ensure when doing make install, a dependency isn't going to install a lot of stuff I don't want? I follow curre

Re: ports questions

Sorry, a cat ran across my keyboard and hit send. I follow current which is the reason I don't just use packages and can make dependency flavor decisions in a matter of seconds. Thanks so very much Barry

authpf: allowing both ipv4 and ipv6 traffic

Hi In order to allow wireless clients both IPv4 and IPv6 access to my wireless access point (protected with authpf) do I need to have them login as authpf twice? Once with IPv4 and again with IPv6? Or is there a more elegant way? Thanks a lot Barry

wvdial.conf -> ppp.conf

Hello I've tried and failed for a few days to convert the following wvdial.conf to something suitable for use on OpenBSD ( I was thinking ppp.conf ) Could someone show me a working example please? [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /etc/wvdial.conf [Dialer Defaults] Phone = *99***1# Username = web Password

Re: wvdial.conf -> ppp.conf

URS00 33208 8 lo0 # ifconfig tun0 tun0: flags=8051 mtu 1500 groups: tun inet 10.0.0.1 --> 10.0.0.2 netmask 0xff00 Any other info of use? Thanks Barry 2008/5/18 Barry Commander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hello > I've tried and failed for

Re: wvdial.conf -> ppp.conf

pp[17987]: tun0: Warning: ff01:5::/32: Change route failed: errno: No such process May 18 16:10:06 tom-laptop ppp[17987]: tun0: Warning: tun0: DIFADDR 10.33.237.63/24 -> 10.0.0.2 returns 0 I've tried setting my default route to both 10.33.237.63 and 10.0.0.2 and get the same limited conn

Re: wvdial.conf -> ppp.conf

2,2 OK AT+CGDCONT=1,"IP","general.t-mobile.uk" OK ATDT*99# CONNECT "" $ 2008/5/18 Barry Commander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I now have limited connectivity (I can ping and receive replies from > internet hosts, but HTTP access time

Re: wvdial.conf -> ppp.conf

2008/5/18 Jesse Callaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 10:43 AM, Barry Commander > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > chatscript for archives > > > > $ cat /etc/ppp/chatscript > > ABORT BUSY > > ABORT VOICE > >