Re: Why anyone in their right mind would like to use NAT64

Well expanding on the address space and numbering issue, that would be a valid use for NAT but I honestly think it would be better to actually try and fix that before trying to put a hack over the top of it. In theory you could do it with routing tables but I could be retarded also so. On Wed, Oct

Re: Why anyone in their right mind would like to use NAT64

On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Simon Perreault wrote: > Le 2012-10-24 15:29, Barbier, Jason a écrit : > > Well expanding on the address space and numbering issue, that would be a >> valid use for NAT but I honestly think it would be better to actually try >> and fix that

Re: kvm on OpenBSD?

> True. Theo de Raadt: > > "You've been smoking something really mind altering, and I think you > should share it. > > x86 virtualization is about basically placing another nearly full > kernel, full of new bugs, on top of a nasty x86 architecture which > barely has correct page protection. Then ru

Re: Why are there no PKG_PATH defaults?

Just to point out if you do an install where you do select a mirror your mirror settings do seem to persist beyond the install, so it sounds like the problem is solved and user education is in order. *washes hands of the problem* -- Jason Barbier | jab...@serversave.us Pro Patria Vigilans

KMS/GEM status for Intel cards

Hey, its been a while since I have seen any update about how KMS and support for the Intel HD 3000 (the sandy bridge Intel card). Anyone know what happens to be going on with that? -- Defendere vivos a mortuis

Re: UEFI BIOS

Yeah, honestly Microsoft has even said already, there will be no nagging the only feature you lose by not using secured booting is the swift boot. if you flip secured UEFI off it just makes windows 8 go into standard boot. fear mongering is not needed, and in the end if a secured boot loader is ne