You wrote:
> Anonymous writes:
> > Is there a bitcoin client for OpenBSD or is anyone porting one?
>
> pstumpf@ posted one to ports@ a few months back:
>
> http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=133804045927036&w=2
>
> Haven't heard of any updates since then.
Thanks I'll have a look.
You wrote:
> On 16 October 2012 19:48, David Coppa wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 7:40 AM, Jay Patel wrote:
> >> Hi ... i copied the libskype.so under /usr/local/purple/ but it wont
> >> show up under adding account or in plugin options ...how to link this
> >> library to pidgin to get acc
> And in common tradition hoardes of OpenBSD devs shall come to the rescue
> and spend hours of unpaid time so you won't have to spend US$300 on
> a new computer. :rolleyes:
Fuck you man! Who needs a new computer? Blades rule! ;-)
> I came to openbsd only recently trying to find a modern OS which will run
> on my old sun blade 100.
Net and FreeBSD probably also support it. Depending on what you want to do
with your system I would recommend OpenBSD or FreeBSD. FreeBSD will have
more current apps (your complaint below) and is
I say again: The prices at the "official European shop" in the Netherlands
are sky high.
Thanks and HAPPY NEW YEAR EVERYBODY
> i saw them on face book and amazon also 250 & 500 us dollars
Like Kurt Russell said, "That's TOO FUCKING HIGH!!!"
When they start selling them for a fair price let's say 50 bucks for the
black box and maybe 150 for a loaded laptop then it's time to buy. Until
then, tekmote isn't getting my busi
> Perhaps he did. Wouldn't it be useful to help the guy trying to help
> you (you know, the "wheat") by giving a really simple and
> straightforward answer, even if it is repeating yourself ? Probably
> would've been less typing than what you just did (e.g. "Sorry, I think
> it runs as user X
> Now that I have it setup with the correct package path, etc, I am finding
> out 5.0 is much better than 4.9 was;
Can you say exactly what is better? I found 4.9 very nice and had no issues
running it on a server.
> What's so funny is that they put GNU/Linux on it, when gNU is supposed to
> be about FREE dom. LOL. Fucking LOL.
That's perfect. GNU has nothing to do with free, it has to do with butt
fucking people until they become ASSimilated. Sounds like a match.
> For poor people in third world countries
> Anonymous wrote:
> > Solaris
> > ZFS
>
> I've heard of it (ZFS) but here's the thing, I struggle enough keeping
> up with Wndows and OpenBSD I don't want to put another system into the
> mix.
Understood. Unfortunately or fortunately however you look at it OpenBSD
doesn't have ZFS. But FreeBSD
> I just downloaded PaderSync SSH Trial and I think I will buy the
> full version.
I got it before it was a paid app whilst still in testing. It seems very
good and handles large keys well enough. The only objection I've got is the
menus and dialogs can be a bit wordy but it does seem to work fine
Brauer spewed:
> * Patrick Lamaiziere [2012-02-29 13:12]:
> > I don't think.
>
> it is very tempting to comment on that :)
>
> > As far I can see here with a rate of 50K packets through the system, it
> > already spents 50% in interrupt.
>
> oh, really! that applies to each and every box and u
> the reason is "you can download source code, look at it, make sure for
> yourself there's no backdoors, build your own ISO from source code"
You can but nobody does. If the entire OpenBSD team can't finish a complete
audit of OpenBSD in one release cycle how long do you suppose it would take
one
> So I downloaded all the package files, wrote them to a USB stick,
> created a bootable image with GRUB, booted into the OpenBSD installer
> and off we go. Now, this computer already had Windows 7 and Linux,
> plus about 16 GB of unpartitioned space where OpenBSD is going. It's
> actually the same
> That's interesting, as for me bsd.rd only creates sd0, so I have to find
> the right sdN in dmesg and then "cd /dev; sh MAKEDEV sdN" if I want to
> install OS there...
as somebody else said the easiest thing is to use whatever fdisk you prefer
and make an OpenBSD partition before starting the OB
I am running OpenBSD 5.1 SPARC (32 bit) under QEMU. It seems to work
perfectly except for a couple of minor annoyances one of which may be QEMU
related/fixable.
In Emacs 23.4.1 -no-x from packages I am having a problem getting both
backspace and delete to work correctly at the same time, correctly
You wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> What do you guys think about the reliability of the news (unfortunatelly
> in German only) on www.golem.de
> (http://www.golem.de/news/bundesregierung-deutsche-geheimdienste-koennen-pgp-
> entschluesseln-1205-92031.html) that the German government claims to be
> able to
Marc Espie wrote:
> W. Richard Stevens was THE best unix books author *ever*, bar none.
>
> He's on a par with such CS giants as Don Knuth, writing-wise.
>
> "Advanced Unix programming" is *the* best book to understand how
> to write Unix code, PERIOD.
Are you saying the 1992 edition is still w
> Call IBM support. You will have 10 technicians onsite in a week.
And 10 invoices in tomorrow's mail.
You wrote a brown nosed post.
> I think
No evidence of that from your post
> that there are few things in this world that are held in as high esteem as
> the C language.
Har dee har har. C is shite. Useful maybe but still shite.
> It is a privilege to be able to write it really
Did you pay yo
21 matches
Mail list logo
