ory
and holding 126530 references
8163 BGP attributes using 149K of memory
RIB using 53.6M of memory
Rgds,
--
~Lst
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 4:27 AM, Rod Whitworth wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 03:06:59 +0700, ~Lst wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>I've already setup bgplg on my test machine, but only show version,
>>ping and traceroute that is work (suggested from
>>http://marc.i
6 BGP attributes entries using 192K of memory
and holding 126660 references
8195 BGP attributes using 151K of memory
RIB using 53.6M of memory
>
>
> Am 26.11.2009 21:06, schrieb ~Lst:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've already setup bgplg on my test machine, but only s
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Andre Keller wrote:
> Am 28.11.2009 09:45, schrieb ~Lst:
>>
>> -bash-4.0# cat /etc/rc.conf.local
>> bgpd_flags="-r /var/www/logs/bgpd.rsock"
>>
>> The socket is working...
>>
>> -bash-4.0# bgpctl -s /v
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Rod Whitworth wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 15:42:51 +0700, ~Lst wrote:
>
>>Yes, I know. If it's wrong via web, it should be the cmd show version
>>didn't work too.
>>Did I miss the configuration ?
>
> Let us see:
> 1>
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Rod Whitworth wrote:
>
> Hmmm, I just remembered another setting that isn't default:
> Try ls -l /var/www/bin/bgpctl
> What does that show?
>
-bash-4.0# ls -l /var/wwwbin/bgpctl
-r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 55048 Jul 10 10:07 /var/www/bin/bgpctl
Rgds,
--
~Lst
(if it's via web).
And if via bgplgsh (CLI) the whole thing is ok.
Rgds,
--
~Lst
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 12:19 AM, Andre Keller wrote:
> Am 28.11.2009 16:36, schrieb ~Lst:
>> No, I just install and followed manual.
>>
>
> You either missed a step or run an very uncommon configuration
It might be I missed a step, Could you help where is the step that I mi
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 1:15 AM, Andre Keller wrote:
> Am 28.11.2009 18:34, schrieb ~Lst:
>> On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 12:19 AM, Andre Keller wrote:
>>
>>> Am 28.11.2009 16:36, schrieb ~Lst:
>>>
>>>> No, I just install and followed manual
>>
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 1:47 AM, Bret S. Lambert wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 01:25:03AM +0700, ~Lst wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 1:15 AM, Andre Keller wrote:
>> > Am 28.11.2009 18:34, schrieb ~Lst:
>> >> On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 12:19 AM, Andre Keller wro
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 2:04 AM, Bret S. Lambert wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 01:56:19AM +0700, ~Lst wrote:
> [ snippzorz ]
>
>> Could you tell me how is running bgplgsh under chroot ?
>
> man 1 chroot
>
-bash-4.0# man 1 chroot
man: no entry for chroot in sectio
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 2:56 AM, Bret S. Lambert wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 02:09:49AM +0700, ~Lst wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 2:04 AM, Bret S. Lambert
>> wrote:
>> > On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 01:56:19AM +0700, ~Lst wrote:
>> > [ snippzorz ]
>> &
28052 Jul 10 10:06 /usr/bin/bgplgsh
Rgds
--
~Lst
man pages).
2. Had been running too in /etc/rc.conf (bgpd_flags="").
Thanks for your kindly help, wasting your time and lot of patience
spare around here.
Rgds,
--
~Lst
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 12:10 AM, Alexander Hall wrote:
> ~Lst wrote:
>
>> Well gentlemen...
>> Right now, it looks like my bgplg has been running well, because of my
>> mistake that is the running of bgpd_flags in two places.
>>
>> 1. The bgpd_flags th
HAHAHA...lol, I like you man! ;))
Rgds,
--
~Lst
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 3:41 AM, James Hozier wrote:
> Don't you dare post that that to our lists again.
>
> --- On Tue, 1/19/10, Jason
> Dixon wrote:
>
>> From: Jason Dixon
>
>> Subject: Announcing: Jiggl
16 matches
Mail list logo
