Jon Higgs writes:
> Hi,
>
> I'm struggling to find a clean way to suppress warnings from security(8)
> about users without a password.
>
> I've intentionally removed the password from the user 'git' so that it
> can gotd can serve anonymous users with git repos over ssh.
>
> The messages appear a
Hi Steve,
It's because sensord polls. I've decreased the check interval from 20 to
5, but it will still miss short outages. See sensorsd(8). An SNMP trap
is probably what you really want, but your UPS will need to support
that.
I hope that helps.
Cheers,
Jon
Hello,
Only "Insert" works from the Fn layout.
Sound, brightness, keyboard backlight control and other buttons do not work.
The Fn button itself has an indicator that is always lit, even in suspend
mode.
Fn + Esc does not change anything.
There are two modes of operation of the Fn layout in the BIO
On Thu, 27 Mar 2025 10:55:13 +1100, Jon Higgs wrote:
> Is there any way to control this? Or am I holding something wrong, and
> these warnings are an artifact of that.
passwd(5) says
The password field is the encrypted form of the password. If the
password field is empty, no password
Hi,
I'm struggling to find a clean way to suppress warnings from security(8)
about users without a password.
I've intentionally removed the password from the user 'git' so that it
can gotd can serve anonymous users with git repos over ssh.
The messages appear as:
Checking the /etc/maste
On 26/03/25 20:55, Daniel Jakots wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Mar 2025 10:55:13 +1100, Jon Higgs wrote:
>
> > Is there any way to control this? Or am I holding something wrong, and
> > these warnings are an artifact of that.
>
> passwd(5) says
>
> The password field is the encrypted form of the pas
I installed OpenBSD 7.6 on Raspberry Pi 4B. System was installed from USB stick
onto 128GB SD card using default answers.
The problem is that I cannot boot it from SD card.
I can boot system from USB stick and load kernel from SD card, but that requires
USB drive being plugged in during boot, whi
I bet on this num 5..
Is it acceptable that before creating the sym link ln resolves the relative
path in absolute path to get rid of this problem? or we risk to get a forcefull
limitation to our bsd-user liberty?
-Dan
--
bsdload.com - Repo: https://code.5mode.com
Please reply to the mail
> I bet on this num 5..
> Is it acceptable that before creating the sym link ln resolves the relative
> path in absolute path to get rid of this problem? or we risk to get a
> forcefull limitation to our bsd-user liberty?
There are points in being able to create, or move, softlinks to places
whe
Hi,
Thanks for your feedback.
I am not simulating a short outage. I left the UPS unplugged for 20
minutes. It should have easily picked up that transition. I could see
that the state had changed in sysctl.
Still wondering...
Cheers,
Steve W.
On 3/26/2025 7:58 PM, Jon Higgs wrote:
Hi S
10 matches
Mail list logo
