just put the line
swap/ramfs mfs rw,nodev,nosuid,-s=300m 0 0
into /etc/fstab (-s means size)
and run
# mount /ramfs
On Sun, Sep 05, 2021 at 07:59:26AM +, iio7 wrote:
> # mount -t tmpfs tmpfs /home/foo/tmp/
> mount_tmpfs: tmpfs on /home/foo/tmp: Operation not supported
>
> Se
On 2021-09-05, iio7 wrote:
> # mount -t tmpfs tmpfs /home/foo/tmp/
> mount_tmpfs: tmpfs on /home/foo/tmp: Operation not supported
It isn't built into the standard kernels, disabled with this commit::
revision 1.229
date: 2016/07/25 19:52:56
disable tmpfs because it receives zero maintainance.
-
On 04/09/2021, ropers wrote:
> On 04/09/2021, Marc Chantreux wrote:
>> Another solution is to write commands for this kind of tasks:
>>
>> <<\. cat > ~/x
>> #! /bin/ksh
>>
>> sed -r 's/a/&\
>> /g'
>> .
>
> Wait, hold up, I'm not familiar with this input redirection idiom.
> Could you explain? Wh
On this mornings snapshot that I just upgraded to I can no longer open
an xterm window. Based on the .xsession-error this must be related to
the unveil capabilities that got added last week as I see "xterm:
unveil" appearing in that file.
Can someone give a hint on what I'm missing to be able to o
# mount -t tmpfs tmpfs /home/foo/tmp/
mount_tmpfs: tmpfs on /home/foo/tmp: Operation not supported
Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com/) Secure Email.
henkjan gersen writes:
> On this mornings snapshot that I just upgraded to I can no longer open
> an xterm window. Based on the .xsession-error this must be related to
> the unveil capabilities that got added last week as I see "xterm:
> unveil" appearing in that file.
>
> Can someone give a hi
henkjan gersen wrote:
> On this mornings snapshot that I just upgraded to I can no longer open
> an xterm window. Based on the .xsession-error this must be related to
> the unveil capabilities that got added last week as I see "xterm:
> unveil" appearing in that file.
>
> Can someone give a hint
05.09.2021 16:31, Andrei пишет:
Hello,
I am trying to setup an OpenVPN server on OpenBSD 6.9 that's bridged to my LAN.
The topology looks like this: 10.70.0.1 (gateway) - 10.70.0.118 (server, on
em1).
I've set-up the em1 interface as DHCP and it get's the expected address. Next
up I
cre
05.09.2021 16:31, Andrei пишет:
Hello,
I am trying to setup an OpenVPN server on OpenBSD 6.9 that's bridged to my LAN.
The topology looks like this: 10.70.0.1 (gateway) - 10.70.0.118 (server, on
em1).
I've set-up the em1 interface as DHCP and it get's the expected address. Next
up I
creat
On 2021-09-05, Andrei wrote:
> tap0: flags=8902 mtu 1500
> lladdr fe:e1:ba:d0:6a:1c
> index 6 priority 0 llprio 3
> groups: tap
> status: no carrier
> bridge0: flags=0<>
> index 7 llprio 3
> groups: bridge
> priority 32768 hellotime 2 fwddela
Hello,
I am trying to setup an OpenVPN server on OpenBSD 6.9 that's bridged to my LAN.
The topology looks like this: 10.70.0.1 (gateway) - 10.70.0.118 (server, on
em1).
I've set-up the em1 interface as DHCP and it get's the expected address. Next
up I
created a tap0 and bridge0 devices like
Assuming I should run "ktrace -di xterm" it doesn't show any failure
condition at the end, i.e. the last lines from the kdump are
--
90075 ktrace NAMI "/usr/X11R6/bin/xterm"
90075 ktrace ARGS
[0] = "xterm"
--
To me that last line looks like the process launches successfully, yet
no xterm wind
sed is so wonderfully versatile!
need to type up ``the rattlin bog'' as fast as it is sung?
do it in n ^ 0.5 time with
sed H\;g
slick as quick-silver!
> 5 сент. 2021 г., в 21:53, Andrei написал(а):
>
>
>> On 05.09.2021., at 15:58, kasak wrote:
>> I've should correct myself in last message. You actually may try to proxy
>> dhcp answers to vpn, adding option
>>
>> server-bridge
>>
>> to server config without pool definition. Please respo
Hello,
I have a stable openbsd69 installed on a raspberry 3b+. It freezes often
especially when I'm connected to internet through a 4g usb modem.
I'm connected to the rpi from linux by serial and ethernet ssh.
There is not any log, kernel panic or message in console.
thanks
cord
It is setgid (privdrop) for utmp support, so ktrace stops reporting on
what the program is doing. If you temporarily chmod your utmp file a+w,
remove the setgid bit from the xterm binary, then you will likely be
able to ktrace further to get closer to identifying the issue.
henkjan gersen wrote:
Hi, I'm trying OpenBSD 6.9 on an Acer Aspire AOA150 netbook, which has
an Atom N270 32-bit x86 processor.
The wired network works fine after the computer is turned on, but stops
working after closing the lid to suspend, then pressing the power
button to resume. After resume, one of the blue-backg
iio7 wrote:
> > On 2021-09-05, iio7 <
> i...@protonmail.com
> > wrote:
> >> # mount -t tmpfs tmpfs /home/foo/tmp/
> >> mount_tmpfs: tmpfs on /home/foo/tmp: Operation not supported
>
> > It isn't built into the standard kernels, disabled with this commit::
>
> > revision 1.229
> > date: 2016/07/
> On 05.09.2021., at 15:58, kasak wrote:
> I've should correct myself in last message. You actually may try to proxy
> dhcp answers to vpn, adding option
>
> server-bridge
>
> to server config without pool definition. Please respond if it works. I'm
> really curious about it.
>
> I use simi
> On 05.09.2021., at 21:11, Kasak wrote:
> I made a typo. Mask should be 255.255.255.0
> I highly recomend not just copying what i say but correcting it to match your
> configuration
Agreed! Fix'd the typo and the config works but yeah - I still can't get the
router to do DHCP.
Bummer.
Than
iio7 wrote:
> On Sunday, September 5th, 2021 at 10:41 PM, Theo de Raadt
> wrote:
>
> > iio7 i...@protonmail.com wrote:
> >
> > > > On 2021-09-05, iio7 <
> > > >
> > > > i...@protonmail.com
> > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > mount -t tmpfs tmpfs /home/foo/tmp/
> > > > > ==
> On 2021-09-05, iio7 <
i...@protonmail.com
> wrote:
>> # mount -t tmpfs tmpfs /home/foo/tmp/
>> mount_tmpfs: tmpfs on /home/foo/tmp: Operation not supported
> It isn't built into the standard kernels, disabled with this commit::
> revision 1.229
> date: 2016/07/25 19:52:56
> disable tmpfs becaus
On Sunday, September 5th, 2021 at 10:41 PM, Theo de Raadt
wrote:
> iio7 i...@protonmail.com wrote:
>
> > > On 2021-09-05, iio7 <
> > >
> > > i...@protonmail.com
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > mount -t tmpfs tmpfs /home/foo/tmp/
> > > > ===
> > > >
> > > > mount_
That indeed gives much more output, but not sure it gives more clarity
as it ends with this:
--
69930 xterm CALL mprotect(0xf4aab8c6000,0x1000,0x3)
69930 xterm RET mprotect 0
69930 xterm CALL mprotect(0xf4aab8c6000,0x1000,0x1From the output just before this the only thing that stands out to me
is
24 matches
Mail list logo
