Re: gdb issue

On 2021-02-04, Anindya Mukherjee wrote: > I'm trying to debug the systat utility for learning purposes. I enabled > -g -O0 in the Makefile, and built it in /usr/src/usr.bin/systat. It > builds and runs fine. However, gdb cannot insert any breakspoints. I'm > on a very recent snapshot and everythin

AX201 Surface Pro 7

Hey I got myself a Surface Pro 7 and thought it had a supported AX201 wifi chip in it but after some looking around in the source I couldn’t find the device ID in there so I tried myself to add it to pcidevs and pcidevs.h. I also added the pci_products to if_iwx.c and pcidevs_data.h. I got it

Re: AX201 Surface Pro 7

On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 11:38:24AM +0100, Fredrik Engberg wrote: > Hey > > I got myself a Surface Pro 7 and thought it had a supported AX201 wifi chip > in it but after some looking around in the source I couldn’t find the device > ID in there so I tried myself to add it to pcidevs and pcidevs.

groups new

0 Canada BC Vancouver Irregular VanBUG Sha'ul ben Avraham van...@riseup.net https://lists.riseup.net/www/info/vanbug *BSD

groups update

0 Canada BC Vancouver Irregular VanBUG Sha'ul ben Avraham van...@riseup.net Subscribe van...@lists.riseup.net https://lists.riseup.net/www/info/vanbug OpenBSD, FreeBSD

Re: gdb issue

>On 2021-02-04, Anindya Mukherjee wrote: >> I'm trying to debug the systat utility for learning purposes. I >> enabled >> -g -O0 in the Makefile, and built it in /usr/src/usr.bin/systat. It >> builds and runs fine. However, gdb cannot insert any breakspoints. I'm >> on a very recent snapshot and e

Groups

0 C Pakistan P Islamabad T Islamabad F Irregular O OpenBSD users of Pakistan I Abdullah Khabir M abdullah@abdullah.today U https://abdullah.today N OpenBSD signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Shared memory segments are note removed after process exit

On Sat, 06 Feb 2021 01:43:09 +, Chris Narkiewicz wrote: > When I check ipcs, I see a lot of shm segments: > > # ipcs | grep _x11 | grep wc -l > 137 > > Both processes are dead at this stage, so I'm not sure why those shm > segments are not collected? This is expected behavior. Shared memory

Shared memory segments are note removed after process exit

I'm running a tandem of Xvfb + x11vnc on a headless box. x11vnc runs as _x11 user. This stack works pretty well for me until one of the processes restarts. When Xvfb restarts, it no longer enabled SHM extension. # Xvfb MIT-SHM extension disabled due to lack of kernel support When I check ipcs,