Re: Potential dig bug?

2020-12-17 Thread Jordan Geoghegan
On 12/16/20 11:19 PM, Otto Moerbeek wrote: On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 02:37:19PM -0800, Jordan Geoghegan wrote: Hi folks, I've found some surprising behaviour in the 'dig' utility. I've noticed that dig doesn't seem to support link local IPv6 addresses. I've got unbound listening on a link loc

Re: Building from source

2020-12-17 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2020-12-17, Chris Zakelj wrote: > Coming back to my self-teaching on how to (hopefully eventually) be > semi-competent, I'm working on trying to build a git project from > source.  Thus far I've been able to figure out things like functions > having slight name differences (e.g. |pthread_set_na

Re: Potential dig bug?

2020-12-17 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 12:27:00AM -0800, Jordan Geoghegan wrote: > > > On 12/16/20 11:19 PM, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 02:37:19PM -0800, Jordan Geoghegan wrote: > > > > > Hi folks, > > > > > > I've found some surprising behaviour in the 'dig' utility. I've noticed > >

Re: Potential dig bug?

2020-12-17 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 11:10:59AM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 12:27:00AM -0800, Jordan Geoghegan wrote: > > > > > > > On 12/16/20 11:19 PM, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 02:37:19PM -0800, Jordan Geoghegan wrote: > > > > > > > Hi folks, > > > > >

Re: Building from source

2020-12-17 Thread Nemo Nusquam
On 12/17/20 04:28, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2020-12-17, Chris Zakelj wrote (in part): Coming back to my self-teaching on how to (hopefully eventually) be semi-competent, I'm working on trying to build a git project from source. You need -L/usr/local/lib on linker commands. This is often done

A bridge(4) too far, time to switch(4)?

2020-12-17 Thread John McGuigan
Howdy misc, A few months ago I posted some issues I was having with switch(4) on my APU2: https://marc.info/?t=16039908201&r=1&w=2 I've come to the conclusion that maybe switch(4) isn't as mature as I thought, or perhaps, I'm just using it wrong. At the time I was convinced that bridge(4) wa