After extensive testing the latency spikes shown up again:
To the inside interface of the firewall:
Reply from 172.16.200.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=254
Reply from 172.16.200.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=254
Reply from 172.16.200.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=254
Reply from 172.16.200.1: bytes=32 time<1ms
What make it different ?
1) arch==> i386 limit to 4G (dmesg) and spdmem show 8G , Bios show 8G
2) arch==> amd64 memory show correct figure 8G (dmeag, spdmem and bios)
1 & 2 use the same machine with different arch.
So can I use the i5 core at i386 arch to use the correct size of memory (i.e
Hi everyone,
Recently, while I was browsing through OpenBSD's CVS history, I came
across a few usages of the -Oz build option (apparently suggesting that
LLVM is not as good at optimizing for size as GCC is, but that's not
very relevant to this email - even if it's true, which I'm not exactly
On 2020/06/11 05:04, man Chan wrote:
> What make it different ?
>
> 1) arch==> i386 limit to 4G (dmesg) and spdmem show 8G , Bios show 8G
> 2) arch==> amd64 memory show correct figure 8G (dmeag, spdmem and bios)
>
> 1 & 2 use the same machine with different arch.
>
>
> So can I use the i5 cor
On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 04:37:34AM +, sensiblehue wrote:
> Hello,
> I was wondering why OpenBSD doesn't have a `__printflike' macro in
> ? FreeBSD, NetBSD, and DragonflyBSD have it and it's also
> available from libbsd on Linux.
> Personally I think it's cleaner and just as portable if not more
> I seems I got it wrong before. Even when there was ESP traffic, iked is going
> to start DPD when there hasn't been any incoming IKE message in the last
> 5 minutes.
>
> My advice would be to just disable DPD in iked for this specific case.
> To do this you will have to patch it and build it fr
On 6/11/2020 8:57 AM, man Chan wrote:
> I just want to know why OpenBSD/i386 have the memory limit to 4G.
All operating systems have this limit. The 80386 was released to the
public in 1986, when 4 GB was an absurd amount of memory.
> It is ok for me to run OpenBSD/amd64 on a i5 machine. Thanks
I just want to know why OpenBSD/i386 have the memory limit to 4G. Thanks for
your reply. It is the design of OpenBSD/i386 is 32 bits OS not the hardware
limitation. It is ok for me to run OpenBSD/amd64 on a i5 machine. Thanks
Clarence
Stuart Henderson () 在 2020年6月11日星期四 下午6:02:56 [GMT+8
> On May 31, 2020, at 6:07 PM, obs...@loopw.com wrote:
>
> ipmitool is timing out on my system with the kernel driver loaded, where I
> havent seen this in previous releases.
>
> I looked at the changes in 6.7 for ipmi.c, there's a number of them (thank
> you!) My intention is to bisect for
On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 06:22:55PM +, sensiblehue wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 03:08:01PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 04:37:34AM +, sensiblehue wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > > I was wondering why OpenBSD doesn't have a `__printflike' macro in
> > > ? FreeBSD, NetBSD,
On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 03:08:01PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 04:37:34AM +, sensiblehue wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I was wondering why OpenBSD doesn't have a `__printflike' macro in
> > ? FreeBSD, NetBSD, and DragonflyBSD have it and it's also
> > available from libbsd on Lin
sensiblehue wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 03:08:01PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 04:37:34AM +, sensiblehue wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > > I was wondering why OpenBSD doesn't have a `__printflike' macro in
> > > ? FreeBSD, NetBSD, and DragonflyBSD have it and it's also
>
Theo de Raadt wrote:
> sensiblehue wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 03:08:01PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 04:37:34AM +, sensiblehue wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > > I was wondering why OpenBSD doesn't have a `__printflike' macro in
> > > > ? FreeBSD, NetBSD, and
I always thought that 'sync' mount option is enough to avoid corruption of
the FS.
Am I just "fooling" myself ?
Best Regards,
Strahil Nikolov
На 10 юни 2020 г. 7:46:48 GMT+03:00, Dirk Coetzee написа:
>I have been in a similar situation of power being unreliable and no
>UPS, so I sympathize
Hello Misc,
Full config at end of email.
I've discussed the below in #openbsd on freenode, and was told to come
here. At present, I have a setup where I need multiple unrelated
servers under a single IP address. I used relayd to do https
interception, read the Host header, and make decisions.
Th
On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 02:36:53PM +, Leclerc, Sebastien wrote:
> > I seems I got it wrong before. Even when there was ESP traffic, iked is
> > going
> > to start DPD when there hasn't been any incoming IKE message in the last
> > 5 minutes.
> >
> > My advice would be to just disable DPD in
I guess it boils down to a matter of preference and business requirements.
"slow writes" vs "no writes".
-Original Message-
From: Strahil Nikolov
Sent: Friday, 12 June 2020 12:08 AM
To: Dirk Coetzee ; Joe Barnett ;
Vertigo Altair
Cc: Misc
Subject: Re: OpenBSD Readonly File System
I
On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 01:03:46PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Theo de Raadt wrote:
>
> > sensiblehue wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 03:08:01PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 04:37:34AM +, sensiblehue wrote:
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > > I was wondering wh
sensiblehue wrote:
> I asked about __printflike because I found it unusual that other major
> BSDs have it and OpenBSD doesn't, despite using macros like __dead,
> __unused, etc.
Systems adopt private solutions, half the time without limiting the scope
to indicate it is private.
The assumption
On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 12:13:42AM +0200, Mark Schneider wrote:
> Hello
>
>
> Even the 640FLR-SFP28 network adapter is listed in the "pcidump -v" output
> on OpenBSD 6.7 there are no entries for it's interfaces in the output of
> "ifconfig -a"
>
> # --
On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 12:57:24PM +, man Chan wrote:
I just want to know why OpenBSD/i386 have the memory limit to 4G. Thanks for
your reply. It is the design of OpenBSD/i386 is 32 bits OS not the hardware
limitation. It is ok for me to run OpenBSD/amd64 on a i5 machine. Thanks
The 4G
21 matches
Mail list logo
