On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 1:16 AM Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 05:16:44PM +0200, Why 42? The lists account. wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 04:51:51PM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> > > > ...
> > > > It looks as if the file has been sorted e.g.
> > > Did you use rcctl
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 08:09:29AM +, man Chan wrote:
> Hello,
> I tried to setup my Linksys WLAN (Ralink RT2560) as access point with
>
> mediaopt hostap
> nwid mynwid wpakey mywpakey
> inet 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.0
>
> When I ifconfig ral0, I got status: no network. Did I missing someth
On 2020-05-27, Elias Carter wrote:
> I will look at doing some profiling to figure out what the routing
> bottleneck is instead of going off a hunch.
The good news is we have dt(4) now so profiling got a bit easier to deal with.
See https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-bugs&m=158583371404603&w=2 for quic
Hello,
I tried to setup my Linksys WLAN (Ralink RT2560) as access point with
mediaopt hostap
nwid mynwid wpakey mywpakey
inet 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.0
When I ifconfig ral0, I got status: no network. Did I missing something to
make it work or this card cannot config as hostap ? any idea ?
T
Another question about pf.
Perhaps I don't fully understand how connection rate is calculated.
The following line in /etc/pf.conf:
pass in log inet proto tcp to any port { smtp smtps } synproxy state \
(max-src-conn-rate 5/30, overload flush global)
Shouldn't avoid this happen?
In /
Using the protocol defaults (tlsv1.3 and tlsv1.2) in latest relayd has
regressed to not supporting SNI?
While server side TLSv1.3 did not make it into 6.7 release, it was supposedly
added in -current. According to relayd.conf(5) manpage:
no tlsv1.3
Disable the
Thank you Stuart.
On Wed, May 27, 2020, 2:07 AM Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2020-05-27, Elias Carter wrote:
> > I will look at doing some profiling to figure out what the routing
> > bottleneck is instead of going off a hunch.
>
> The good news is we have dt(4) now so profiling got a bit easie
What do you do with table in other rules? If you’re doing nothing, you
need to do something like block additional connections, or adjust the pass rule
to include from !
Run: pfctl -t smtp -T show
Does it show the offending IP? If so, the rule worked as you defined it.
> On May 27, 2020,
Hello Brian,
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 02:35:46PM -0400, Brian Brombacher wrote:
> What do you do with table in other rules? If you’re doing nothing,
> you need to do something like block additional connections, or adjust the
> pass rule to include from !
You're right. I forgot to mention I h
I got some questions on ffs2 in 6.7. This is to set the record
straight, feel free to share on forums like reddit that I do not read,
let alone post on.
1. Using 6.7, the *installer* defaults to ffs2 for new filesystems for
almost all platforms.
2. Using 6.7, a newfs "by hand" still gets you f
howdy,
you can use symbolic links for /etc/rc.d/nsd to /etc/rc.d/nsd1
and to/etc/rc.d/nsd2 to /etc/rc.d/nsdn where 1,2 n are your r
domains for your
dns servers (authoritive) or you can use unbound instead of nsd
if it is just a forwarding dns server
then use for a dns server for rdo
oh yeah you will have to adjust the flags for each daemon (to accept a
different
config file for each dns server in each Rdomain...
hope this helps...
On Wed, 27 May 2020 at 23:35, Tom Smyth
wrote:
> howdy,
>
> you can use symbolic links for /etc/rc.d/nsd to /etc/rc.d/nsd1
> and to/etc/r
Keep in mind operations using pfctl such as reloading rule set or table from
file, any IP’s caught in the smtp table by the max-src-conn-rate will be
flushed depending on your command line.
> On May 27, 2020, at 4:29 PM, Walter Alejandro Iglesias
> wrote:
>
> Hello Brian,
>
>> On Wed, May
Hi all,
How can I allow different rdomains to use separate DNS nameservers?
Thanks
Hi,
While surfing on the Google to learn more about OpenBSD, I encountered this
one: "OpenBSD: Not Free Not Fuctional and Definetly Not Secure (
https://aboutthebsds.wordpress.com/2013/01/25/20/)
Is the author telling the truth? Or just yet another anti-BSD thing?
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 2:20 PM Quantum Robin wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> While surfing on the Google to learn more about OpenBSD, I encountered this
> one: "OpenBSD: Not Free Not Fuctional and Definetly Not Secure (
> https://aboutthebsds.wordpress.com/2013/01/25/20/)
>
> Is the author telling the truth?
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 2:21 PM Aaron Mason wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 2:20 PM Quantum Robin
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > While surfing on the Google to learn more about OpenBSD, I encountered this
> > one: "OpenBSD: Not Free Not Fuctional and Definetly Not Secure (
> > https://abouttheb
On a fresh 6.7 installation, mount(8) shows 'type ffs'. Is there any way
to figure out the version number?
On 2020-05-27 22:54, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
I got some questions on ffs2 in 6.7. This is to set the record
straight, feel free to share on forums like reddit that I do not read,
let alone po
Den tors 28 maj 2020 kl 07:51 skrev Matthias :
> On a fresh 6.7 installation, mount(8) shows 'type ffs'. Is there any way
> to figure out the version number?
>
>
https://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article;sid=20200326083657
--
May the most significant bit of your life be positive.
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 07:48:57AM +0200, Matthias wrote:
> On a fresh 6.7 installation, mount(8) shows 'type ffs'. Is there any way
> to figure out the version number?
dumpfs /dev/rsdXY | head -1
-Otto
>
>
> On 2020-05-27 22:54, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > I got some questions on ffs2 i
If you look at the titles of some of the other "articles"
You will see a trend of unhappiness.
The author has the right to write such things, just as everyone else has the
right to ignore it.
--STeve Andre'
On May 28, 2020, 00:16, at 00:16, Quantum Robin
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>While surfing on the
Dear all;
I've been trying to boot the 6.7 installation media from USB via EFI on
a Dell PowerEdge R610. The screen goes blank and then the thing resets
(so no kernel output or anything). I can boot the same stick via BIOS.
I've been searching for a while without results. Firmware settings
22 matches
Mail list logo
