On 04/03/2020 18:35, Florian Obser wrote:
> The ifconfig option parser is... special.
> You must set flowdst as well as pflowproto.
my bad.
the problem was the src IP which was changed and the change wasn't reflected in
the hostname.pflow0
sorry for the noise
G
Me's been following this discussion w/ some interest.
Personally, meuses lynx(1) (w/o the ports patches, as they interfere w/
text field editing among other things), in image_links mode w/ feh(1).
Works like a charm :)
Mecan only agree with the sentiment that if something does not work in a
norm
On 03-05 04:18, Tomasz Rola wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 02:06:40AM +0100, whistlez...@riseup.net wrote:
> > Hi,
> > in the following message:
> > https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=158110613210895&w=2
> > Theo discourages to use unveil instead of chroot.
> > I asked if he suggests the same fo
Actually I see the same problem on 6.6-stable :
including readline/readline.h produces warnings.
Any -Werror hope some day ?
cheers
Le mer. 4 mars 2020 à 13:41, Thomas de Grivel a écrit :
>
> With latest OpenBSD snapshot on amd64
>
> In file included from /usr/include/readline/chardefs.h:26,
>
On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 01:41:32PM +0100, Thomas de Grivel wrote:
> With latest OpenBSD snapshot on amd64
>
> In file included from /usr/include/readline/chardefs.h:26,
> from /usr/include/readline/keymaps.h:36,
> from /usr/include/readline/readline.h:38,
>
On Thu, 05 Mar 2020 16:07:48 +0100, Thomas de Grivel wrote:
> Actually I see the same problem on 6.6-stable :
> including readline/readline.h produces warnings.
>
> Any -Werror hope some day ?
You still haven't bothered to include:
1) the compiler you are using
2) the compiler flags to reproduce
Todd C. Miller wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Mar 2020 16:07:48 +0100, Thomas de Grivel wrote:
>
> > Actually I see the same problem on 6.6-stable :
> > including readline/readline.h produces warnings.
> >
> > Any -Werror hope some day ?
>
> You still haven't bothered to include:
>
> 1) the compiler you
On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 11:38:40AM +, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 at 01:06, wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > in the following message:
> > https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=158110613210895&w=2
> > Theo discourages to use unveil instead of chroot.
> > I asked if he suggests the same for
Hi,
Should this be on ports@? I'm not working on a port...
TL;DR:
Does anyone have any recommendations on how to work around not having
pthread_mutexattr_setpshared in the OpenBSD pthreads library?
DETAILS:
I wanted to see if Apache Guacamole would compile on OpenBSD to server
as a remote d
On Mar 5, 2020 10:15 AM, Steve Williams wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Should this be on ports@? I'm not working on a port...
>
> TL;DR:
> Does anyone have any recommendations on how to work around not having
> pthread_mutexattr_setpshared in the OpenBSD pthreads library?
>
Have you tried searching the p
On 05/03/2020 10:53 a.m., Edgar Pettijohn wrote:
On Mar 5, 2020 10:15 AM, Steve Williams wrote:
Hi,
Should this be on ports@? I'm not working on a port...
TL;DR:
Does anyone have any recommendations on how to work around not having
pthread_mutexattr_setpshared in the OpenBSD pthreads libra
On Wed, 04 Mar 2020 08:05:08 +
Xianwen Chen (陈贤文) wrote:
> Dear Ducan,
>
> I just set up a Brother HL-5450DN Series on OpenBSD 6.6 amd64.
>
> > 1. ulpt must be disabled:
> > # config -ef /bsd
> > ukc> disable ulpt
> > ukc> quit
>
> I studied tutorials on-line and previous discussions on @m
On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 08:38:02 +0100
Sebastien Marie wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 03, 2020 at 10:57:03PM -0700, Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote:
> >
> > I've had problems getting an old Brother printer to work (again)
> > and have managed to locate/understand? the source of the problems.
> >
> > 1. ulpt mu
Hi All,
We've been running OpenBSD on a server for several years now and its been
reliable with minimal issues, so I thought I would also like to try it as
a desktop system.
Thus I've been experimenting with an Intel NUC 8i5BEH running OpenBSD
current snapshots and with XFCE as the Windowing sy
Hello there,
There is two property proposals to review on Wikidata, one related to
NetBSD and the other to OpenBSD.
Please see:
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Property_proposal/NetBSD_package
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Property_proposal/OpenBSD_port
Any comments are very wel
Hi,
Christophe Poncy wrote on Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 11:33:23PM +0100:
> There is two property proposals to review on Wikidata, one related to
> NetBSD and the other to OpenBSD.
>
> Please see:
> https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Property_proposal/OpenBSD_port
>
> Any comments are very welco
Hi,
I am using Openbsd 6.5 and noticed that the pledge policy for lndir
includes wpath but I don't see why this group is necessary. I have removed
the group and recompiled the binary and it seems to run fine with the test
script below.
#!/bin/ksh
mkdir -p /home/dir1/subdir1
mkdir /home/dir2
mkdi
Thanks Theo! I am working on it right now.
On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 9:21 AM Theo de Raadt wrote:
> shankarapailoor . wrote:
>
> > I was looking at the pledge policy for the tset binary and I was
> wondering
> > why wpath is necessary. I removed the group from the pledge and did some
> > basic tes
18 matches
Mail list logo
