On 2019/12/05 00:17, Kihaguru Gathura wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 11:58 PM Kihaguru Gathura wrote:
>
>
>
> >> Which is a better way to implement a WAF on OpenBSD using the base
> utilities?
> >
> > relayd configured in certain ways might be considered as a
On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 02:11:16PM +, Pedro Caetano wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> I'm sorry, but since the boxes do not (yet) have working networking it is
> not easy for me to get the text output.
> I'm attaching a few pictures with the requested output.
>
> https://picpaste.me/images/2019/12/03/ca
Hi,
i like the tweak; OK to commit?
While it is reasonable to expect this behaviour without the "zero
or more", i see how the misunderstanding "one or more" can arise:
In many situations, to grant no permissions on a given path, it is
sufficient to not mention it in unveil(2) at all, so it may no
Hi Chris,
i just committed the patch shown below;
thanks for bringing up the point.
Yours,
Ingo
CVSROOT:/cvs
Module name:src
Changes by: schwa...@cvs.openbsd.org2019/12/05 17:14:08
Modified files:
lib/libc/sys : unveil.2
Log message:
Explicitly say that *
Dear devs,
You are awesome!
>From @qualys twitter:
Qualys researchers discovered an authentication-bypass vulnerability
(CVE-2019-19521) in OpenBSD's authentication system. Special thanks to Theo de
Raadt and the OpenBSD developers for a very quick response: they published
patches in <40 hours
5 matches
Mail list logo