>
> Index: arch/amd64/stand/libsa/gidt.S
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/arch/amd64/stand/libsa/gidt.S,v
> retrieving revision 1.11
> diff -u -p -u -r1.11 gidt.S
> --- arch/amd64/stand/libsa/gidt.S 27 Oct 2012 15:43:42 - 1
Everything works except wifi, suspend/resume and screen backlight, and
mute speakers button.
--
Thomas de Grivel
kmx.io
Could you please provide a dmesg output? The info you gave is not very helpful
without it.
--
Tony
GPG-FP: 49CC8250 CDCF2183 6209C1AE 625677C1 F7783D5F
Threema: DN8PJX4Z
> On 9. Nov 2019, at 12:08, Thomas de Grivel wrote:
>
> Everything works except wifi, suspend/resume and screen backli
Hm, also no replies to that one :-)
On 11/6/19 8:15 PM, Markus Wernig wrote:
> So just to make sure: Is anybody using syncookies and/or synproxy in
> production in a similar setup?
So nobody is using syncookies/synproxy at all?
best /m
Sure, here it is :
OpenBSD 6.6-current (GENERIC.MP) #442: Sat Nov 9 01:36:23 MST 2019
dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
real mem = 23478448128 (22390MB)
avail mem = 22754553856 (21700MB)
mpath0 at root
scsibus0 at mpath0: 256 targets
mainbus0 at root
bios0 a
The
xfwm4 --vblank=xpresent --replace &
did fix this for me until last update made the problem gone for me
permanently!
Thx
Here is my dmesg:
OpenBSD 6.6 (GENERIC.MP) #0: Sat Oct 26 08:08:07 MDT 2019
r...@syspatch-66-amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/
GENERIC.MP
real mem = 8468
Does raid0 allow the creation of file systems bigger than the 2 TB limit of ffs?
Dave Raymond
--
David J. Raymond
david.raym...@nmt.edu
http://physics.nmt.edu/~raymond
On Sat, Nov 09, 2019 at 07:01:02AM -0700, Raymond, David wrote:
> Does raid0 allow the creation of file systems bigger than the 2 TB limit of
> ffs?
Yes. And ffs in general does not have that limit. newfs will move to
ffs2 if needed.
-Otto
On Sat, Nov 09, 2019 at 01:30:32PM +0100, Markus Wernig wrote:
> Hm, also no replies to that one :-)
>
> On 11/6/19 8:15 PM, Markus Wernig wrote:
>
> > So just to make sure: Is anybody using syncookies and/or synproxy in
> > production in a similar setup?
>
> So nobody is using syncookies/synpro
On Sat, Nov 09, 2019 at 07:01:02AM -0700, Raymond, David wrote:
> Does raid0 allow the creation of file systems bigger than the 2 TB limit of
> ffs?
RAID 0 stripe sizes may be as large as the smallest physical extent.
FFS2 -- see newfs(8) -- supports a filesystem size up to 64 PB.
Hmmm
On install of openbsd a second, non-boot 4 TB disk was initialized by
fdisk in the usual way. My intention was to create a single partition
and file system for the whole disk. However, disklabel limits me to a
partition size of 2 TB. The c partition automatically covers the full
disk,
On Sat, Nov 09, 2019 at 08:24:36AM -0700, Raymond, David wrote:
> Hmmm
>
> On install of openbsd a second, non-boot 4 TB disk was initialized by
> fdisk in the usual way. My intention was to create a single partition
> and file system for the whole disk. However, disklabel limits me to a
>
Thanks, that did the trick!
Dave
On 11/9/19, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 09, 2019 at 08:24:36AM -0700, Raymond, David wrote:
>
>> Hmmm
>>
>> On install of openbsd a second, non-boot 4 TB disk was initialized by
>> fdisk in the usual way. My intention was to create a single partition
On Friday, November 8, 2019, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Philip Guenther wrote:
>
> > No, it should be the other way, moving the “clear NT flag” block down
> after
> > the “save registers into save area” block
>
> Ah.
>
> Index: arch/amd64/stand/libsa/gidt.S
>
On Sat, Nov 09, 2019 at 12:08:35PM +0100, Thomas de Grivel wrote:
> Everything works except wifi, suspend/resume and screen backlight, and
> mute speakers button.
Hi,
I have an X395 which is basically the same machine.
For Wifi I have temporarily replaced the Intel WiFi with a bwfm(4), the
Dell
15 matches
Mail list logo
