Re: pkg_add source code modification

2018-12-16 Thread Marc Espie
On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 07:31:48PM +0100, Ingo Schwarze wrote: > That's typical for pkg_add(1). There are few programs in the tree - > even including unmaintained legacy stuff - where it is harder to > find anything. In pkg_add(1), code for each object is typically > scattered across many files,

Re: netstat *:* udp sockets

2018-12-16 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 01:26:25PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote: > Philip Guenther wrote: > > And, perhaps more directly, how would I block this in pf.conf? > > > > > > > Excellent choice, blocking dhclient from receiving the leases that it > > requests. > > "What problem are you trying to solve?" >

Machine hangs on DDB, unable to get info to send in bug report

2018-12-16 Thread Michael Pagano
Hello, I seem to be having a difficulty with DDB. I am intending to send in a bug report for a kernel panic I'm having, but unfortunately, I am unable to acquire the proper details necessary to send in a meaningful report because of DDB hanging when this kernel panic occurs. Is there a way to obta

Re: procmail and new grammar in smtpd.conf

2018-12-16 Thread Anthony Campbell
On 15 Dec 2018, Marcus MERIGHI wrote: > cl...@syntheticnation.com (schwack), 2018.12.11 (Tue) 22:36 (CET): > > On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 10:07:34AM -0500, Daniel Corbe wrote: > > > at 6:22 AM, Eda Sky wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Executive summary: delete the procmail port; the code is not safe and

Re: netstat *:* udp sockets

2018-12-16 Thread Ted Unangst
Claudio Jeker wrote: > On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 01:26:25PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote: > > Philip Guenther wrote: > > > And, perhaps more directly, how would I block this in pf.conf? > > > > > > > > > > Excellent choice, blocking dhclient from receiving the leases that it > > > requests. > > > "What

Re: netstat *:* udp sockets

2018-12-16 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Sun, Dec 16, 2018 at 05:09:06PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote: > Claudio Jeker wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 01:26:25PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote: > > > Philip Guenther wrote: > > > > And, perhaps more directly, how would I block this in pf.conf? > > > > > > > > > > > > > Excellent choice, block