Hi,
I'm wondering if it would be possible to add iked to my box already running
isakmpd.
I found this quite old thread:
http://openbsd-archive.7691.n7.nabble.com/iked-isakmpd-on-the-same-machine-td246610.html
just checking to see if things might have changed since then.
Ive a vio0 interface wi
Hi NN,
On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 11:57:15 +0200 NN wrote:
>
> here is my pf.conf on VM#1:
>
> int_if="{ vether0 re0 }"
> set block-policy drop
> set log interface egress
> set skip on lo0
> match in all scrub (no-df random-id max-mss 1440)
> match out on egress inet from
Hi,
I'm trying to figure out the most suitable config params transform OpenBGPD
into a route server.
So far I have :
route-collector yes
transparent-as yes
But my concern is more in the area of suitable filters to prevent loops.
I'm thinking I need something along the lines of :
allow to any
Hi,
Am 30.08.2018 10:27 schrieb Sebastian Reitenbach:
Hi,
I'm wondering if it would be possible to add iked to my box already
running isakmpd.
I found this quite old thread:
http://openbsd-archive.7691.n7.nabble.com/iked-isakmpd-on-the-same-machine-td246610.html
Why is it "always" my old thre
I would like to apologize for the previous email. The joke was
unprofessional and very rude.
I’m sorry if it was offensive to someone in this list.
-Bogdan
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 22:40 Bogdan Kulbida wrote:
> I love it! Damn f.. asshole! Get him out of here!
>
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 21:09 T
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 03:29:50PM +, Bob Smith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to figure out the most suitable config params transform OpenBGPD
> into a route server.
>
> So far I have :
> route-collector yes
If you are configuring a route server, you don't want "route-collector yes".
Or if yo
Thanks for your reply.
>
> If you are configuring a route server, you don't want "route-collector yes".
> Or if you want a route collector, it won't advertise any route so your
> concerns
> are null.
Interesting point. My understanding was that a route server did not make any
best-path decis
This mail keeps crawling out the dumpster again and again. Are we done with
this topic here? Correct me when I am wrong but afaik there are pretty simple
rules about the mailing list(s) so asking about selling stuff in the first
place proofed lack of reading and or comprehending simple rules or
Hello,
I tried to run alpine linux (alpine-virt-3.8.0-x86_64.iso)
under the OpenBSD (latest snapshot) virtual machine.
I was able to boot it, even to install it to an image.
I connect to the console with the 'vmctl console' command.
At various moments I am no longer able to write anything,
the a
at 1:35 PM, flauenroth wrote:
This mail keeps crawling out the dumpster again and again. Are we done
with this topic here? Correct me when I am wrong but afaik there are
pretty simple rules about the mailing list(s) so asking about selling
stuff in the first place proofed lack of reading
On Thu, 30 Aug 2018 at 20:43, Rudolf Sykora wrote:
> I connect to the console with the 'vmctl console' command.
> At various moments I am no longer able to write anything,
> the alpine system as if freezes.
It seems to be a problem with the console.
I still can ssh to the system, and it is
workin
On Aug 30, 2018 1:48 PM, Daniel Corbe wrote:
>
>
> at 1:35 PM, flauenroth wrote:
>
> > This mail keeps crawling out the dumpster again and again. Are we done
> > with this topic here? Correct me when I am wrong but afaik there are
> > pretty simple rules about the mailing list(s) so asking
On 8/30/2018 15:27:23, ed...@pettijohn-web.com wrote:
On Aug 30, 2018 1:48 PM, Daniel Corbe wrote:
at 1:35 PM, flauenroth wrote:
> This mail keeps crawling out the dumpster again and again. Are we
done
> with this topic here? Correct me when I am wrong but afaik there are
> pretty si
On 30/08/2018 17:39, Philipp Buehler wrote:
I was not following development too closely, but I think that on the
kernel side
things have not changed. Which means iked and isakmpd will happily
"toe tap"
on each others SADB in the kernel (even if there is *some* PID handling).
Would like to hear
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 07:40:55PM +, Daniel Corbe wrote:
>
>
> On 8/30/2018 15:27:23, ed...@pettijohn-web.com wrote:
>
> >
> > https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=141634350915839&w=2
>
>
> Hmm..
>
> $ procmail -v
> procmail v3.22 2001/09/10
> Copyright (c) 1990-2001, Stephen R. van
I quote from the FAQ:
Complaining about and commenting upon spam on the list proper is
counter-productive, as it generates more traffic than the spam
itself.
I am cognizant that I am violating this rule right now, but maybe helps
reduce pointless traffic in the future...
Allan
On 2018-08-30 22:06, Daniel Polak wrote:
> On 30/08/2018 17:39, Philipp Buehler wrote:
>> I was not following development too closely, but I think that on the
>> kernel side
>> things have not changed. Which means iked and isakmpd will happily
>> "toe tap"
>> on each others SADB in the kernel (even
Hi all,
Looking at the manpage for smtpd.conf it’s possible to block a domain with:
reject sender
and put:
@domain.tld
Is it possible to block entire tld’s and if so what would the syntax be?
I’d like to filter out high spam content senders “.bid, .date, .us” that I”m
seeing and avoid spam
Seems like a rational response to the issue.
On 8/30/18, Allan Streib wrote:
> I quote from the FAQ:
>
> Complaining about and commenting upon spam on the list proper is
> counter-productive, as it generates more traffic than the spam
> itself.
>
> I am cognizant that I am violating t
Jon Tabor writes:
Yep, right there with ya. So, ah...what's everyone using for
mail
filtering these days? Spamassassin? ClamAV? Something else
entirely?
i use maildrop:
http://www.courier-mta.org/maildrop/
Alexis.
20 matches
Mail list logo
