Dear Ingao,
Thank you!
I am very interested in implementing UTF-8 input into csh(1). Would you agree
that a good startig point would be to look at how your implemented UTF-8
support in ksh(1)?
I tried to find your commit on GitHub, which implement UTF-8 support in ksh(1).
I could not find it
Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Feb 2018 13:41:20 -0800
>
>
> > I am considering a move to OpenBSD, since I subscribed to this
> > mailing list some time ago (~few months). I want to take advantage
> > of security.
>
> I would use OpenBSD if you can but if you do decide on Linux and care
>
On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 12:47 AM, wrote:
> What is the output of:
>
> $ hostname
>
>
hugs# hostname
hugs.antarctica.no
hugs# hostname -s
hugs
My original question was which mounting options are optimal for FFS
filesystems on SSD:s, for data-safety and relative IO speed.
It seems noone in this thread had any data-safety issues ever and so
there was no feedback beyond "use the defaults".
I guess "noatime" as a measure to lower write load
t1...@protonmail.ch (Tinker), 2018.02.11 (Sun) 06:06 (CET):
> My original question was which mounting options are optimal for FFS
> filesystems on SSD:s, for data-safety and relative IO speed.
>
> It seems noone in this thread had any data-safety issues ever and so
> there was no feedback beyond "
Hi Tinker,
If you don't expect to run into unexpected shutdowns (power .. you will
be ok with defaults ) ie if you believe the system will always
have reliable power, (and you will have access to the console to help
fsck on reboot, in the unlikely event of loss of power to the running system)
the
On 02/11/18 05:12, Christer Solskogen wrote:
On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 12:47 AM, wrote:
What is the output of:
$ hostname
hugs# hostname
hugs.antarctica.no
hugs# hostname -s
hugs
I'm out of ideas. Pretty sure it won't like a hostname without 2 parts ie:
my.domain
Looks like there has
On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 5:05 AM, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> Extraneous "bound to ..." messages are no longer logged on renewal.
>
> So the original "bound to ..." message remains valid until something
> changes.
>
> If you look at the leases file you should see it get a new 'epoch' (the
> time
Hi Xianwen Chen,
Xianwen Chen wrote on Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 08:50:20AM +:
> Would you agree that a good startig point would be to look at how
> your implemented UTF-8 support in ksh(1)?
Probably, that's one of the pieces of information you need.
I'm not sure it will be sufficient, though; i
Hello,
I'm using the latest release. Where the dl speed in other OS is approx. 1.4
MB/s in BSD is only approx. 240 KB/s. Why is this? Is about a setting in some
config file that limits download/traffic rate?
Thanks.
Hi Zsolt,
in order to help us help you try to include more information
output from dmesg , what is your network configuration
ifconfig
route -n show
there is no default queuing in OpenBSD that would limit you that
badly
Thanks
On 11 February 2018 at 19:15, Zsolt Kantor wrote:
> Hello,
>
On 02/11/18 20:15, Zsolt Kantor wrote:
> I'm using the latest release. Where the dl speed in other OS is approx. 1.4
> MB/s in BSD is only approx. 240 KB/s. Why is this? Is about a setting in some
> config file that limits download/traffic rate?
You're not giving us a lot to work with here.
Bu
Below I provide full information from ifconfig, route and a full dmesg. By the
way, I think this is a BUG in the wireless firmware that I'm using (downloaded
from the OpenBSD firmware site). I say this because I found this line in the
dmesg output: wpi0: fatal firmware error
So below are the ou
Hi,
has anybody tried to run tor inside vmm guest?
it's horrible slow, just doing 'tor-resolve $dnsname' takes
sometimes ages.
# dmesg | head -n 4
OpenBSD 6.2-current (GENERIC.MP) #0: Sat Feb 10 00:05:49 MST 2018
dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
real m
First of all I must to clarify that I'm newbie in networking and there are some
thinks that I don't understand in your message, but, I will do anything you ask
to resolve the problem, because I think this is a bug in the wifi firmware that
I'm using (please read the reply sent to Tom). I'm runni
On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 06:38:49PM -0500, Jiri B wrote:
> Hi,
>
> has anybody tried to run tor inside vmm guest?
>
> it's horrible slow, just doing 'tor-resolve $dnsname' takes
> sometimes ages.
>
> # dmesg | head -n 4
> OpenBSD 6.2-current (GENERIC.MP) #0: Sat Feb 10 00:05:49 MST 2018
> der
Hi,
I have a home network that is segmented into 3 different zones using a NIC with
4 ports sitting on an OpenBSD firewall/dhcp server. One port is connected to
the Internet (ISP router) and each of the three others has a D-Link DGS-1005D
switch connected to each.
So..
LAN1 = 192.168.1.0
LAN2
Hi Zolt
when your laptop is on line try
fw_update -a
command to update firmware... you probably were not online when the
firmware update command ran (on first boot after install)
See what happens when you run that command ..
Thanks
Tom Smyth
On 11 February 2018 at 23:15, Zsolt Kantor wrote:
>
On 02/11/18 21:41, Tom Smyth wrote:
Hi Zolt
when your laptop is on line try
fw_update -a
Best to leave off the `-a' or else you will be downloading all available
firmware even that which you do not need.
command to update firmware... you probably were not online when the
firmware updat
On 12.02.18 01:26, Martin Hanson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a home network that is segmented into 3 different zones using a NIC
> with 4 ports sitting on an OpenBSD firewall/dhcp server. One port is
> connected to the Internet (ISP router) and each of the three others has a
> D-Link DGS-1005D swit
Try -current[0]. I think henning will be glad to hear how his new toy
works in the field.
martijn@
[0] https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvs&m=151796069324365&w=2
On 02/12/18 01:26, Martin Hanson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a home network that is segmented into 3 different zones using a NIC
> with 4 po
Martin,
Depending on the type of box you have and amount of Ram on your box
(throw Resources at the problem and hope that the resources > than the attack
I would look at PF Limits and increase the maximum amount of states in
the firewall
it is 1 by default...which is on the low side(in my hu
Regards D-Link... I would recommend that you use
a decent managed switch (based on Tech Specs as opposed
to Branding,
you can pick up cost effective ubnt edgeswitches or
Tplink (fully managed Switches) which would offer linerate switching
or if you want to have a branded switch get one second hand
24 matches
Mail list logo
