On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 01:04:40AM -0500, Andrew Daugherity wrote:
> I recently dug out of the closet my old IBM PS/2E, which had served as
> my firewall box from 2000ish-06, and was in fact the very first
> machine I ever installed OpenBSD on, to see if it still worked
> properly. It did (after c
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 11:57:40PM -0700, Mike Larkin wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 01:04:40AM -0500, Andrew Daugherity wrote:
> > I recently dug out of the closet my old IBM PS/2E, which had served as
> > my firewall box from 2000ish-06, and was in fact the very first
> > machine I ever install
A few quick tests on 6.1-i386 in a VM showed that 20M seems to be minimum
now, at 17-19M disk setup would segfault late in the installation and at
16M em0 couldn't get TX stuff allocated, so that failed even earlier.
2017-09-01 9:43 GMT+02:00 Mike Larkin :
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 11:57:40PM -0
Building your own kernel (on your fast machine with lots of memory),
stripped of every driver your machine doesn't have, can get you a bit
further on memory constrained machines. This gets you into
unsupported land, but if you want support you're probably best of
spending a nickel and getting a be
A couple of months ago i have read this
https://www.bsdfrog.org/pub/events/my_bsd_sucks_less_than_yours-AsiaBSDCon2017-paper.pdf
are there any new developments for packages binary updates?
thanks in advance
On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 12:01:42PM +0300, G wrote:
> A couple of months ago i have read this
>
> https://www.bsdfrog.org/pub/events/my_bsd_sucks_less_than_yours-AsiaBSDCon2017-paper.pdf
>
> are there any new developments for packages binary updates?
Yes, see: https://man.openbsd.org/syspatch
--
> Yes, see: https://man.openbsd.org/syspatch
I think he meant binary stable updates for packages. syspatch is only
for the base system.
Regards,
Aaron
--
Web: https://drkhsh.at/ or http://drkhsh5rv6pnahas.onion/
Gopher: gopher://drkhsh.at or gopher://drkhsh5rv6pnahas.onion
GPG: 0x09e71697435bf5
Yes
On 09/01/2017 12:54 PM, Aaron Marcher wrote:
>> Yes, see: https://man.openbsd.org/syspatch
>
> I think he meant binary stable updates for packages. syspatch is only
> for the base system.
>
> Regards,
> Aaron
>
M:Tier provide stable package updates https://stable.mtier.org/
On 1 September 2017 at 10:54, Aaron Marcher wrote:
>> Yes, see: https://man.openbsd.org/syspatch
>
> I think he meant binary stable updates for packages. syspatch is only
> for the base system.
>
> Regards,
> Aaron
>
> --
> Web: http
Yess, openup... amazing tool and call syspatch, too! :p
Le 09/01/17 à 11:58, GSO a écrit :
> M:Tier provide stable package updates https://stable.mtier.org/
>
> On 1 September 2017 at 10:54, Aaron Marcher wrote:
>>> Yes, see: https://man.openbsd.org/syspatch
>>
>> I think he meant binary stable
The sudoreplay event loop was rewritten in 1.8.21. The bug only
occurs when logging input as well as output. I've reproduced this
now and will debug it later today.
- todd
I know about m:tier. I thought there were plans for binary security
patches on stable without using m:tier.
On 09/01/2017 12:58 PM, GSO wrote:
> M:Tier provide stable package updates https://stable.mtier.org/
>
> On 1 September 2017 at 10:54, Aaron Marcher wrote:
>>> Yes, see: https://man.openbs
I make extensive use of softraid crypto on two internal and a bunch of
external disks. This results in up to 32 sd(4) devices attaching to
my machine. However, by default MAKEDEV only creates 10 sd device
nodes in /dev.
How do people deal with this? For now, I've got the following in
/etc/rc.lo
> I make extensive use of softraid crypto on two internal and a bunch of
> external disks. This results in up to 32 sd(4) devices attaching to
> my machine. However, by default MAKEDEV only creates 10 sd device
> nodes in /dev.
>
> How do people deal with this? For now, I've got the following i
On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 1:57 AM, Mike Larkin wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 01:04:40AM -0500, Andrew Daugherity wrote:
> >
> > boot> hd0a:/bsd.61
> > cannot open hd0a:/etc/random.seed: No such file or directory
> > booting hd0a:/bsd.61: 7678420+2057220+174556+0+1097728
> > [72+501520+501951
On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 11:46:05PM +0200, Paul de Weerd wrote:
> I make extensive use of softraid crypto on two internal and a bunch of
> external disks. This results in up to 32 sd(4) devices attaching to
> my machine. However, by default MAKEDEV only creates 10 sd device
> nodes in /dev.
>
>
16 matches
Mail list logo
