Make your support contingent on in-person in-kind services like enjoying a
meal together or having them help you move furniture.
On Jul 13, 2017 01:21, "Niels Kobschätzki" wrote:
>
> > On 13. Jul 2017, at 00:35, Rui Ribeiro wrote:
> >
> > "I dont do Windows!" works pretty well...
>
> Damn, they
On 11/07/2017 20:39, Niels Kobschätzki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am pondering to install OpenBSD on my main machine. But I just found a
> possible showstopper: family remote support
>
> Right now I am using Teamviewer to connect from my Linux-machine to the
> family-Mac. Now I am searching a similar easy
On 13/07/17 09:36, Philippe wrote:
The best option to me was a reverse SSH. A script connect them
automatically to my server @home, opening a specific port so I can
connect to their computers.
It works, it's simple, they don't have to do anything, they even can go
anywhere I'll still be able to
On 13.7.2017. 0:26, Per-Olov Sjöholm wrote:
> I increased net.inet.ip.ifq.maxlen in steps of 256… I had to increase the
> net.inet.ip.ifq.maxlen 9 times to 2309 for the net.inet.ip.ifq.drops to stop
> increasing. At a maxlen of 2309 the drops stopped completley. But all values
> of net.inet.ip
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 10:09:11AM +0200, Alarig Le Lay wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It's just Base64 Content-Transfer-Encoding, and it's part of rfc2045.
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2045#section-6.8
>
> So, the problem is on marc.info side. Moreover, it's working on
> mutt and on mail-archive:
> htt
This is current/amd64 on Dell Latitude E5570 (full dmesg below).
Skylake started working; this is a diff to the previous dmesg:
--- dmesg/dell-latitude-E5570.20170627 Tue Jun 27 14:32:18 2017
+++ dmesg/dell-latitude-E5570.20170713 Thu Jul 13 15:11:56 2017
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-OpenBSD 6.1-current (GE
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 09:45:55AM +0100, Etienne wrote:
> On 13/07/17 09:36, Philippe wrote:
> > The best option to me was a reverse SSH. A script connect them
> > automatically to my server @home, opening a specific port so I can
> > connect to their computers.
> >
> > It works, it's simple, the
Hi,
I have recently read about WireGuard Protocol and it seems really
interesting. Here's a description (from wireguard.io):
"WireGuard is an extremely simple yet fast and modern VPN that
utilizes state-of-the-art cryptography. It
> - Will it supersede IPsec, in your opinion?
No.
It sounds like a “diet IKEv2.” It does key exchange and encapsulation over one
port and is layer 3 only. [1]
It might be a sufficient solution for a quick, simple VPN setup. If you want
something more, there’s OpenIKED.
[1] https://www.wire
9 matches
Mail list logo
