> At least two bugs leading to this panic have been fixed post 6.0. I'd
> suggest you to upgrade to -current where it should work as expected. If
> not, please send a new bug report to bugs@.
Thanks a lot! This is awesome, you manage to fix bugs faster than I can report
them ;-)
I guess I won't
sc...@ggr.com (Scott Bonds), 2017.02.28 (Tue) 02:21 (CET):
> I'm polling using xrandr to check whether a new display was plugged
> in, so I can run a script to switch to it, i.e. plug in an external
> VGA monitor and it lights up automatically, unplug it and my laptop
> automatically switches back
On Wed, 01 Mar 2017, Marcus MERIGHI wrote:
> sc...@ggr.com (Scott Bonds), 2017.02.28 (Tue) 02:21 (CET):
>> I'm polling using xrandr to check whether a new display was plugged
>> in, so I can run a script to switch to it, i.e. plug in an external
>> VGA monitor and it lights up automatically, unplu
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 10:14:39AM GMT, Marcus MERIGHI wrote:
> sc...@ggr.com (Scott Bonds), 2017.02.28 (Tue) 02:21 (CET):
> > I'm polling using xrandr to check whether a new display was plugged
> > in, so I can run a script to switch to it, i.e. plug in an external
> > VGA monitor and it lights up
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 11:49 AM, Raf Czlonka wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 10:14:39AM GMT, Marcus MERIGHI wrote:
>> sc...@ggr.com (Scott Bonds), 2017.02.28 (Tue) 02:21 (CET):
>> > I'm polling using xrandr to check whether a new display was plugged
>> > in, so I can run a script to switch to it,
Hi,
anyone know how to configure pf to make hairpin nat ?
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 12:50:39PM +0100, Frank White wrote:
> Hi,
> anyone know how to configure pf to make hairpin nat ?
At first blush, no.
But after a quick web search, I can think of several equally opaque
terms for the same phenomenon. Some more useful than others.
A piece of general advi
nexthop qualify via ( bgp | default ) If set to bgp , bgpd(8) may use BGP
routes to verify nexthops. If set to default , bgpd may use the default route
to verify nexthops. By default bgpd will only use static routes or routes added
by other routing daemons like ospfd(8) .
What is it that this
Hi folks,
I spent way too much time on a table defined twice by
accident in my pf.conf file. Do you think it would be
possible to throw a warning if there are 2 table
definitions with the same name?
Probably
table
:
:
table const persist { 172.22.32.0/24 200
On 2017-03-01, Mike Hammett wrote:
> nexthop qualify via ( bgp | default ) If set to bgp , bgpd(8) may use
> BGP routes to verify nexthops. If set to default , bgpd may use the
> default route to verify nexthops. By default bgpd will only use static
> routes or routes added by other routing daemon
On 2017-03-01, Frank White wrote:
> Hi,
> anyone know how to configure pf to make hairpin nat ?
Should be something like this.
pass in quick inet proto tcp to self port 7755 rdr-to $SOMEHOST port 80 tag
hairpin
pass out quick inet tagged hairpin nat-to egress:0
On 03/01, Marcus MERIGHI wrote:
sc...@ggr.com (Scott Bonds), 2017.02.28 (Tue) 02:21 (CET):
I'm polling using xrandr to check whether a new display was plugged
in, so I can run a script to switch to it, i.e. plug in an external
VGA monitor and it lights up automatically, unplug it and my laptop
a
Thank you for the suggestion. x-on-resize compiles and runs fine. It notices
resizes, which I suspect I'll find useful down the road :) But, unfortunately,
it doesn't notice when I plug/unplug my VGA monitor.
I think I'll fall back to Plan B: map the F7 key to trigger a script which will
run x
yes it works well. But it's very interesting the use of tag.
Is egress:0 the if alias ?
2017-03-01 16:09 GMT+01:00 Stuart Henderson :
> On 2017-03-01, Frank White wrote:
> > Hi,
> > anyone know how to configure pf to make hairpin nat ?
>
> Should be something like this.
>
> pass in quick inet
On 2017/03/01 17:12, Frank White wrote:
> yes it works well. But it's very interesting the use of tag.
There might be another way to do it, but I stopped looking after I hit
upon one that worked :)
> Is egress:0 the if alias ?
It's the "main" address on the interface, so it's a single consistent
So not useful in a route server qualifying that an inbound route's next hop is
the speaker itself. It looks like I can do that with filters, I just wanted to
make sure I wasn't missing a better way.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothe
David Coppa wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 11:49 AM, Raf Czlonka wrote:
> > A while ago, Keith Packard wrote small display configuration tool
> > called x-on-resize[0] which might be exactly what you are looking
> > for but I have no idea how much effort would it be to get it
> > working/ported o
Hi,
Wondering if anyone knows about the new release schedule? It has always been 6
months of course, so I presumed today would be the day. Probably just a little
impatient and excited for this one.
Kind regards
> Wondering if anyone knows about the new release schedule? It has
> always been 6 months of course, so I presumed today would be the
> day. Probably just a little impatient and excited for this one.
Releases are generally near start of May and November.
I was counting from last release on Sept 1st, my apologies.
> Wondering if anyone knows about the new release schedule? It has
> always been 6 months of course, so I presumed today would be the
> day. Probably just a little impatient and excited for this one.
Releases are generally near star
Since 6.1 will be the first release in our "twentieth year" I hope the
foundation offers installation service where Theo shows up in a limousine
wearing a tuxedo and installs 6.1 for the princely sum of $10,000.
What do you say Theo?
-PZ
From: owner-m...@o
Hello everybody.
I know that speed does not matter this days, and security matter.
But i want an advice, i have xeon computer with fresh disks, they work
pretty fast,
and also i have 1 gbit switch and 1gbit intel nic on both side, here is
iperf test:
$ doas iperf -s
---
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 2:22 PM, Pete Zabagel wrote:
> Since 6.1 will be the first release in our "twentieth year" I hope the
> foundation offers installation service where Theo shows up in a limousine
> wearing a tuxedo and installs 6.1 for the princely sum of $10,000.
Plus replacement costs if t
Oh, and he needs to port it to my TAM* and stay for fancy hors d'oeuvres (beef
jerky, pop tarts and whiskey).
*http://guides.macrumors.com/Twentieth_Anniversary_Macintosh
On 2017-03-01 14:23, kasak wrote:
Hello everybody.
I know that speed does not matter this days, and security matter.
But i want an advice, i have xeon computer with fresh disks, they work
pretty fast,
and also i have 1 gbit switch and 1gbit intel nic on both side, here
is iperf test:
$ doas i
> The more complex the protocol, the slower the transfer.
> 85 MB/sec sounds about right for ftp in my opinion, samba may need some
> performance tuning.
Yep, I would recommend when tuning Samba to not just throw a bunch of
optimizations in there and expect it to work magically. It's better to tes
I know the arm64 port is still in its early days and under heavy development,
but I'm trying to install the most recent available snapshot and running into a
problem.
I wrote the miniroot60.fs to an SD card and powered up the system. Serial
console works fine, and the installer functions as usu
It appears that Gstreamer-1.0 can't access raw uaudio(4) devices (rsnd/n).
I'm struggling to debug further so wanted to ask if this is expected to
work or a known limitation of OpenBSD's sndio(7) implementation for
gstreamer?
This is where I've got to so far:
Gstreamer-1.0 works fine with uaud
Apologies for the awful formatting gmail inflicted on my previous mail...
Gstreamer info and dmesg below.
gstreamer1-1.10.4 framework for streaming media
gstreamer1-plugins-base-1.10.4 base elements for GStreamer
>> OpenBSD/amd64 BOOT 3.33
boot>
booting hd0a:/bsd: 6994272+2216968+259456+0+67
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 07:39:17PM +, Joseph Gidi wrote:
> I know the arm64 port is still in its early days and under heavy development,
> but I'm trying to install the most recent available snapshot and running into
> a problem.
>
> I wrote the miniroot60.fs to an SD card and powered up the
I know the arm64 port is still in its early days and under heavy
development,
but I'm trying to install the most recent available
snapshot and running into
a problem.
I wrote the miniroot60.fs to an SD card and powered up the system.
Serial console works fine, and the installer functions as usual,
31 matches
Mail list logo
