Hi there,
I have a pppoe0 interface setup like this (hostname.pppoe0):
inet 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 NONE \
pppoedev re0 \
authproto pap \
authname 'myuser' \
authkey 'mypass' up
dest 0.0.0.1
!/sbin/route add default 0.0.0.1
!/sbin/pfctl -f /etc/pf.conf
!/etc/rc.d/i
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 09:36:35AM +0200, Gabriele Tozzi wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I have a pppoe0 interface setup like this (hostname.pppoe0):
>
> inet 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 NONE \
> pppoedev re0 \
> authproto pap \
> authname 'myuser' \
> authkey 'mypass' up
> des
>From the pf.conf man page:
"Surrounding the interface name (and optional modifiers) in
parentheses changes this behaviour. When the interface name is
surrounded by parentheses, the rule is automatically updated whenever
the interface changes its address. The ruleset does not need to be
reloaded.
pass in on pppoe0 inet proto tcp to (pppoe0) port ssh keep state
Von meinem Samsung Gerät gesendet.
Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Von: Gabriele Tozzi
Datum: 12.05.2016 09:45 (GMT+01:00)
An: misc@openbsd.org
Betreff: PF and interface changing IP
On May 10 18:45:49, h...@stare.cz wrote:
> > > > > malloc() warning: unknown char in MALLOC_OPTIONS
> >
> > if it's only some programs, then it's because those are older programs.
>
> Yes they are. I will get back after they recompile. Thanks.
Indeed, after recompiling the ports (it was on
On 12 May 2016, Gabriele Tozzi wrote:
(snip)
> Then I have setup PF to allow incoming ssh traffic. Here is my rule:
>
> pass in on pppoe0 inet proto tcp to pppoe0 port ssh keep state
>
>
> The interface has a dynamic IP. I was relying on the "!/sbin/pfctl -f
> /etc/pf.conf" rule to reload my PF whe
dillo
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 12:04:50AM +, Romain wrote:
> Is it possible to supply multiple index files to the directory index
> directive? I mean, I would like to write something like that in
> httpd.conf:
>
>directory index "index.html" "index.php"
>
> which would mean that, if the
Thank you for all your answers.
I did not know about the "new" parentheses feature.
Solved :)
Gabriele Tozzi
--
GPG Key Fingerprint:
DAD1 E3E3 C3E9 36FB C570 F405 9B5F 7108 A1D0 2FFF
Allright.
Thanks for your answer.
On Thu, 12 May 2016 11:40:10 +0200
Erling Westenvik wrote:
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 12:04:50AM +, Romain wrote:
> Is it possible to supply multiple index files to the directory index
> directive? I mean, I would like to write something like that in
>
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 10:18:09AM +, Romain wrote:
> Allright.
> Thanks for your answer.
Have a look at this thread: https://github.com/reyk/httpd/issues/27
And my example would probably be better this way:
> On Thu, 12 May 2016 11:40:10 +0200
> Erling Westenvik wrote:
>
> On Thu, May
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 07:30:42PM -0400, Devin Ceartas wrote:
> Can you run Swift on OpenBSD?
>
>
> devin
Which one?
This:https://swift.org
Or that: http://swift-lang.org/main/
rru
> dillo
is in ports www/dillo - a fast and light graphical web browser (no JS)
[http://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/~checkout~/ports/www/dillo/pkg/DESCR]
"Dillo is a multi-platform graphical web browser known for its speed
and small size. It is written in C and C++ and based on FLTK."
[ht
On 12.05.2016 00:26, 3sad68+aivzh013i5...@guerrillamail.com wrote:
Hi,
did anyone try Midori or other light browsers with good results ?
Sent using GuerrillaMail.com
Block or report abuse:
https://www.guerrillamail.com/abuse/?a=TEhnBi0PU7Ebih2wvnENdQ%3D%3D
Midori works fine. But if your d
Hi,
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 7:26 PM,
<3sad68+aivzh013i5...@guerrillamail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> did anyone try Midori or other light browsers with good results ?
I've been using www/luakit for a long time on a thinkpad x40/i386. It
is running fast and works just fine.
html5 support was fixed in -
I was thinking of the Apple sponsored projects which is now supposedly open
source & usable server side. I've done Objective-C in the past but have not
played with Swift yet myself; if it were available I might play with that
amongst all the other languages and frameworks that I am using on project
Le Wednesday 11 May 2016 à 10:26:03PM, 3sad68+aivzh013i5...@guerrillamail.com a
écrit :
> Hi,
>
> did anyone try Midori or other light browsers with good results ?
You might want to give a try to xombrero.
It's webkit based and was "Built with security in mind" [0]
When in "whitelist" mode, it
sogal writes:
> Le Wednesday 11 May 2016 à 10:26:03PM, 3sad68+aivzh013i5...@guerrillamail.com
> a écrit :
>> Hi,
>>
>> did anyone try Midori or other light browsers with good results ?
>
> You might want to give a try to xombrero.
> It's webkit based and was "Built with security in mind" [0]
Ba
On 2016-05-12, Erling Westenvik wrote:
> Not that I'm aware of. Anyway: Such logic should be part of your
> application, not the web server since it would just add unnecessary and
> ambiguos complexity to the latter.
>
>> Or should I do it in another way?
>
> You could try something like this:
>
Le Thursday 12 May 2016 à 09:52:56AM, Aaron Bieber a écrit :
>
> sogal writes:
>
> > Le Wednesday 11 May 2016 à 10:26:03PM,
> > 3sad68+aivzh013i5...@guerrillamail.com a écrit :
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> did anyone try Midori or other light browsers with good results ?
> >
> > You might want to give a
Hello, this is my first post on OpenBSD, so do not riddle me, please...
I have one infrastructure with one tunnel IPSEC. This works ok, but I think I
can duplicate the transfers. My topology is like this:
* One ADSL 20Mb on Site A
* Two ADSL 10Mb on Site B
* Consists on one OpenBSD by site
Am 12.05.2016 11:52 schrieb Gabriele Tozzi:
I did not know about the "new" parentheses feature.
It was brand-new with the 3.2 release :-)
--
pb
> On 2016-05-10, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> >> > Also, after you generate and sign the certificate, you don't have
> >> > to keep the script.
> >>
> >> Validity on the letsencrypt CA is 90 days max. (Partly to restrict
> >> usefulness of a bad cert because they don't do CRLs, which are pretty
>
> > It's main unrealised potential benefit is; add *some* security by
> > default to all those insecure wordpress logins.
>
> That's a terrible reason. And actually it's "make those insecure
> CMS sites look more like they might be secure" when they're no
> such thing. Because people have been t
> Firefox used to be nice, but I don't like the way it goes with
> embedded crap such as Hello or even worse, the Pocket thing.
>
Indeed, but it's maybe the last web browser caring about its users,
without selling them or asking them to pay.
w3m already has been mentionned on the list. With some t
Thank you very much! I will look into that.
On Thu, 12 May 2016 12:54:02 +0200
Erling Westenvik wrote:
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 10:18:09AM +, Romain wrote:
> Allright.
> Thanks for your answer.
Have a look at this thread: https://github.com/reyk/httpd/issues/27
And my example wou
sogal said:
>> Basically anything that is using webkit is going to have issues:
>> https://blogs.gnome.org/mcatanzaro/2016/02/01/on-webkit-security-updates/
>>
>> This means, xombrero, luakit, probably all the others that aren't
>> firefox and chromium.
>
> Thanks for the interesting link.
> The
using broadbandspeedchecker.co.uk i measured the bandwidth on my virgin
media line,
the download speed varied form as low as 20Mb/sec up to 50Mb/sec
depending on the time of day the test was run,
what will be the result if i put a value for the queue bandwidth which
is greater or lesser the the max
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 6:12 PM, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote:
> You must face the reality: all web browsers are broken. Modern web
> rendering engines are too complex and too fast-moving to be securable at
> all. Mozilla and Google made every effort to ensure that nobody can
> ever be safe.
A re
>So
>is their an agenda or just many idiots who see TLS=security and don't
>see lack of secure cookie usage and XSS vulnerabilities (now protected
>by SSL everywhere) meaning a site is likely exploitable in other ways!!
You guys should seriously check "Nirvana fallacy".
> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 6:12 PM, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
> wrote:
> > You must face the reality: all web browsers are broken. Modern web
> > rendering engines are too complex and too fast-moving to be securable at
> > all. Mozilla and Google made every effort to ensure that nobody can
> > ever b
On 2016-05-12 08:37, nacredata wrote:
I was thinking of the Apple sponsored projects which is now supposedly open
source & usable server side. I've done Objective-C in the past but have not
played with Swift yet myself; if it were available I might play with that
amongst all the other languages a
32 matches
Mail list logo
