Re: dig and DNSSEC

2015-09-25 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2015-09-24, Etienne wrote: > Hello there, > > Is there any chance that dig (src/usr.sbin/bind/bin/dig/) could be build > with -DDIG_SIGCHASE to enable dnssec verification in future releases? > Where would be a proper place to request that? > > Cheers, > I've just added this to the ports vers

Re: dig and DNSSEC

2015-09-25 Thread Etienne
On 2015-09-25 15:05, Stuart Henderson wrote: Is there any chance that dig (src/usr.sbin/bind/bin/dig/) could be build with -DDIG_SIGCHASE to enable dnssec verification in future releases? Where would be a proper place to request that? I've just added this to the ports version of BIND (ports/n

Re: dig and DNSSEC

2015-09-25 Thread Theo de Raadt
>By any chance, once the base version of bind is being phased out, do you >know if there will still be a dig(1) in the base? dig and nslookup will remain in base. Go look in our tree at the contortions required to keep them there, since ISC has created a mess of their own libraries and makes the

Re: network config question

2015-09-25 Thread patrick keshishian
On 9/24/15, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote: > On 24/09/15 22:41, patrick keshishian wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm pretty sure I'm over-thinking this, so I thought I'd step back and >> see if I can get some hints as how this sort of a set-up is done >> "properly" by pros. >> >> >> Say, existing set up: >> >>

Re: network config question

2015-09-25 Thread Daniel Melameth
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 1:20 PM, patrick keshishian wrote: > On 9/24/15, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote: >> On 24/09/15 22:41, patrick keshishian wrote: >>> I'm pretty sure I'm over-thinking this, so I thought I'd step back and >>> see if I can get some hints as how this sort of a set-up is done >>> "

Re: doas and home directory of target user

2015-09-25 Thread dan mclaughlin
On Fri, 25 Sep 2015 02:09:40 +0900 Joel Rees wrote: > At any rate, I have convinced myself that doas follows the manual page > in preserving the calling user's key environment variables, including > HOME and USER. > > I had not grasped that this was considered desired behavior, so did > not initi

powerof2()

2015-09-25 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Mark Kettenis wrote on Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 02:27:52PM -0600: > CVSROOT: /cvs > Module name: src > Changes by: kette...@cvs.openbsd.org2015/09/25 14:27:52 > > Modified files: > sys/dev/pci/drm: drm_linux.h > > Log message: > Apparently 0 is not a power of 2 (despite claim

Re: powerof2()

2015-09-25 Thread Ted Unangst
Ingo Schwarze wrote: > Mark Kettenis wrote on Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 02:27:52PM -0600: > > > CVSROOT:/cvs > > Module name:src > > Changes by: kette...@cvs.openbsd.org2015/09/25 14:27:52 > > > > Modified files: > > sys/dev/pci/drm: drm_linux.h > > > > Log message: > > Appar

Re: powerof2()

2015-09-25 Thread Mark Kettenis
> Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 23:04:03 +0200 > From: Ingo Schwarze > Cc: misc@openbsd.org > Content-Disposition: inline > X-XS4ALL-DNSBL-Checked: mxdrop113.xs4all.nl checked 199.185.137.3 against DNS > blacklists > X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=Z+kRZylA c=1 sm=0 tr=0 > a=VwSXPDCcsmtHzRxBP0Jd6w==:117

Re: powerof2()

2015-09-25 Thread Raul Miller
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Mark Kettenis wrote: > And perhaps it is intentional that powerof2(0) is true. Even Linux > has it that way. I'd say this is better left like it is now. Well... I guess that would be 2^(-infinity) ? -- Raul

Fwd: TEXTODROIT SERVICES

2015-09-25 Thread Fol Art X
Textodroit Services toujours au service de la communauté / Textodroit Services always helping the community: textodr...@gmail.com Vous ne voyez pas ce message ? *Ouvrir dans un navigateur*

Re: powerof2()

2015-09-25 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Hi Mark, Mark Kettenis wrote on Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 11:37:17PM +0200: > Ingo Schwarze wrote: >> Mark Kettenis wrote on Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 02:27:52PM -0600: >>> CVSROOT:/cvs >>> Module name:src >>> Changes by: kette...@cvs.openbsd.org2015/09/25 14:27:52 >>> >>> Modified fil