On Sun, May 04, 2014 at 10:39:33PM +0200, Vincent Gross wrote:
> Hi gang,
>
> I am considering to write a daemon of some kind, and I was going over
> OpenBGPd's sources to get some good fine-grained design examples. I
> noticed that although all IO's are asynchronous, libevent is not used,
> but I
* Claudio Jeker [2014-05-05 10:50]:
> On Sun, May 04, 2014 at 10:39:33PM +0200, Vincent Gross wrote:
> > I am considering to write a daemon of some kind, and I was going over
> > OpenBGPd's sources to get some good fine-grained design examples. I
> > noticed that although all IO's are asynchronous
On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 12:28:38PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Claudio Jeker [2014-05-05 10:50]:
> > On Sun, May 04, 2014 at 10:39:33PM +0200, Vincent Gross wrote:
> > > I am considering to write a daemon of some kind, and I was going over
> > > OpenBGPd's sources to get some good fine-graine
Hi,
Does anybody know of any integration between PF and ndpi?
I would love to be able to block by application (bittorrent, skype...) in
PF!
If there is nothing out there, would it be a lot of work, is ndpi already
working in OpenBSD?
Thanks.
Richard
Hi Richard,
On 05 May 2014, at 14:21, Richard Thornton wrote:
> Does anybody know of any integration between PF and ndpi?
the previous consensus[1] was that pf(4) and DPI do not mix very well, but
you can probably use relayd(8) and run e.g. NDPI on top[2]. Grabbing all
traffic is not really fa
You can use Snort Alpha + ipfw daq + OpenAppId to block applications via
divert sockets.
But dont forget it is experimental for now and i can not say it is working
well...
--
Destan YILANCI
5 May 2014 tarihinde 15:21 saatinde, Richard Thornton
Åunları yazdı:
> Hi,
>
> Does anybody know of a
Hi,
I have setup similar to this:
BOX1 BOX2
Internet---($isp_if:::$dmz_if)--DMZ--($nat_if:::$int_if)---LAN
$isp_if: 10Mbit/s
$dmz_if: 1Gbit/s
$nat_if: 1Gbit/s
$int_if: 1Gbit/s
I would like to queue traffic for some services in DMZ for both Internet
and LA
Hello all,
I am hacking around OpenBGPd and there is a portion of code I can't
quite understand.
I wonder why "pipe_m2r[2]" is passed as a parameter to
pid_t session_main(int pipe_m2s[2], int pipe_s2r[2], int pipe_m2r[2],
int pipe_s2rctl[2])
(in session.c)
and "pipe_s2r[2]" is passed to
pid_t
J Sisson [sisso...@gmail.com] wrote:
> I have some questions regarding the EdgeRouter 8 port (not the POE or
> PRO, and obviously not the LITE model, as it's already supported).
>
> I was curious if the relevant developers have had a chance to get
> their hands on one of these, and if so, how simi
On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 08:25:23PM +0200, Denis Fondras wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I am hacking around OpenBGPd and there is a portion of code I can't
> quite understand.
>
> I wonder why "pipe_m2r[2]" is passed as a parameter to
>
> pid_t session_main(int pipe_m2s[2], int pipe_s2r[2], int pipe_m2r
Le 05/05/2014 20:35, Stefan Sperling a écrit :
>
> Take a look at what fork() does with file descriptors.
>
Thank you Stefan, that's now crystal clear.
Denis
* Denis Fondras [2014-05-05 20:26]:
> I am hacking around OpenBGPd and there is a portion of code I can't
> quite understand.
>
> I wonder why "pipe_m2r[2]" is passed as a parameter to
>
> pid_t session_main(int pipe_m2s[2], int pipe_s2r[2], int pipe_m2r[2],
> int pipe_s2rctl[2])
> (in session.c
12 matches
Mail list logo
